[img_inline caption=Remember, WWJD?. width=390 src=http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/0801/bestiality-bestiality-demotivational-poster-1200471651.jpg]
So I'm trolling around on youtube and I stumble upon this video a bunch of 12 years olds made. The kids are at a sleepover or whatever trying to get the family dog to hump one of their friends while they all laugh. Immature? Yeah. Humorless? Check. Pretty gay? Definitely. But there are only a few comments, so I look down (past all the ones that repeat the above sentiment) and find, in part, this:
I can't just ignore that, so I just give him a little nudge, "uh... what?" His rebuttal? It was composed of such gems as:
And here's [http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments=1&v=krN4n7zSR6E] the link to the comments for that video. I think reading this guy's pretentious, "philosophical" ramblings is just free entertainment at it's best. He's kobidobidog and I'm IXPrometheusXI.
(I should have said) UPDATE: Well I just received a message from another user (named dogsneedlovetoo, btw) informing me that the guy I was arguing with is like 70 and totally senile, which explains the poor grammar and oddball language. And I just got done calling him a troll... should I feel bad about this? I'm not sure. If he's that far gone, he probably isn't upset about it, right?
EDIT: To all offended, about this quote from the top of the post:
So I'm trolling around on youtube and I stumble upon this video a bunch of 12 years olds made. The kids are at a sleepover or whatever trying to get the family dog to hump one of their friends while they all laugh. Immature? Yeah. Humorless? Check. Pretty gay? Definitely. But there are only a few comments, so I look down (past all the ones that repeat the above sentiment) and find, in part, this:
Besides the overwhelming dissonance I feel when imagining being "calm assertive" while a dog is trying to butter my biscuit, I was also really disturbed to imagine the scenario that led this person -- who in the same breath referred the preteen boys in the clip to a web site promoting and teaching about bestiality -- to watch that video. I mean, I kind of doubt he was just looking for young minds to educate about the sexual needs of house pets.
I can't just ignore that, so I just give him a little nudge, "uh... what?" His rebuttal? It was composed of such gems as:
He even went so far as to assert that zoophilia (I guess the PC term for it, w/e it rolls off the tongue well enough) was not sexual abuse because humans go to war with each other. I argued with him, asserting that his premises were uniformly irrelevant (not in those words, obviously), but then he brought Christianity into it, saying Christians were evil for... well, I'll let him say it:
Eloquent, no? But it doesn't stop there! He goes on to compare those who jerk off their dogs for fun to The Lord Jesus Christ himself! And the logic is beautiful, in his words:
No joke. "Jesus,= the zoosexual" (his words again). And he just keeps going with that no matter how many times I tell him (and I did say this) it's batshit bonkers! The worst part of this is that I actually agree with him. I know, right? His responses are head-explodingly retarded, but I can't say his claim is unsupportable. Seriously, why can't Fido be "man's best friend" -- with benefits? Of course it would be messed up to go skull fucking a kitten, but think about a great big Labrador. Certainly the size would match up well enough for that sort of thing. And what if you're on the receiving end? I just don't think it hurts them, is all. And apparently they're willing and into it; I'm reassured of that every time I get attacked my mutt terrier in the back yard. It's totally fucked up, but only in the same way scat is, so I don't see why it should be illegal.
[HEADING=1]TLDNR[/HEADING]Bestiality is gross, but I don't think there's anything legally or even morally wrong with it. Plus, this one guy's a fucking moron. I was just thinking, hell, we've talked about lolicon and general porn recently, let's throw this in there as well.In the words of my apparently brain deficient new friend said:
And here's [http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments=1&v=krN4n7zSR6E] the link to the comments for that video. I think reading this guy's pretentious, "philosophical" ramblings is just free entertainment at it's best. He's kobidobidog and I'm IXPrometheusXI.
(I should have said) UPDATE: Well I just received a message from another user (named dogsneedlovetoo, btw) informing me that the guy I was arguing with is like 70 and totally senile, which explains the poor grammar and oddball language. And I just got done calling him a troll... should I feel bad about this? I'm not sure. If he's that far gone, he probably isn't upset about it, right?
EDIT: To all offended, about this quote from the top of the post:
I didn't mean offense to homosexuals, or homosexuality in general with that remark. I was trying to make a triplet, for rhetorical purposes, and picked a poor phrase.
