Critic Accuses Prince of Persia of "Whitewashing"

MatsVS

Tea & Grief
Nov 9, 2009
423
0
0
Eldritch Warlord said:
MatsVS said:
obliviondoll said:
ANCIENT Persia, not MODERN. THEY WERE CONSIDERED WHITE. Even Modern Persia (now officially called Iran, but Persia is sometimes used too) has a good number of fair-skinned people. The majority of the darkness of their skin comes from living in a desert.
So what? It's still a western actor playing an eastern character. This is not solely a racial matter, but also a cultural and historical one.
The thing is though, the Persian ethnicity originated in what would now be considered part of Europe. Then they migrated south into the Iranian Plateau around three thousand years ago.

Gyllenhaal and Cyrus the Great (founder of the first Persian Empire) could have shared a grandfather from three thousand years ago for all we know.
Which is clearly relevant to current socio-political aspects of the discussion in question.
 

DanDeFool

Elite Member
Aug 19, 2009
1,891
0
41
Cheesebob said:
Isn't the Prince white in the games?
He is absolutely pasty in the original game. And blond too.

So yeah... Persian, right. Suspending disbelief in 3...
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,073
0
0
WrongSprite said:
Andy Chalk said:
"It's not only insulting to Persians, it's also insulting to white people. It's saying white people can't enjoy movies unless the protagonist is white."
Bullshit, in that case he's saying that he can't enjoy movie unless the protagonist is Persian, which is a similar train of thought. He had an English accent in the games, why not the movie? There's a stupidly big deal made over this, it's pathetic, I mean, PoP is hardly noted for it's realism, no?
thank you! i was hoping other people noticed that.

good god toss the racism out the window on this one, especially while in the games he not only looked like an average white guy he had the accent for one too

do they even base the games in persia???
 

Icehearted

New member
Jul 14, 2009
2,081
0
0
I won't bother reading 7 pages of what I'm going to assume are race arguments. Instead, I'll take this little spot on the board as a chance to say that I actually see their issue, and I empathize. Many of you are probably way too young to remember (hell even I am... almost) but Kirk Douglass played a Native American in a movie once, in fact if you look back on movies made in the 60s-70s you'll find that many races/nationalities were depicted, rather rediculously, by white guys.

Kirk donned brown makeup, as did his co-star and leading lady, accentuating this absurdity was his chiseled jaw, cleft chin, and other very caucasian features, even bright blue eyes. John Wayne, in 1958, played Genghis Khan. In 1931 Warner Oland (Swedish) played a Chinese man named Charlie Chan.

This isn't anything new, but it is rather silly, and it is a bit racist. I can get wanting to cast the better actor for the role, but what if Ororo Munroe had been played by, say, Natalie Portman in blackface?

And before anyone get's testy, I know Eddie Murphy did it a lot, but his work was characterizing and comedy, not drama, or action, or anything that could be construed as "srs business".

 

Silver Patriot

Senior Member
Aug 9, 2008
867
0
21
I just want the actor to appropriately fill the role that they are cast for. I really don't care otherwise.
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,073
0
0
HuddledMass said:
Michael Clarke Duncan played the Kingpin in Daredevil ... is that racist towards whites ? If a movie came out about a video game or comic book that had a Persian actor playing a white character I'm they would see it as inspiring ... grow up people... no one cares ... and in the end "no one caring" is what everyone wants right ?
i completely forgot about this! thank you for reminding me, i personally did not care that he played kingpin, i was a bit in shock as i did not see him signing up for the role, but i was perfectly fine with it


BarbaricGoose said:
No one ever complains about Blackwashing.. Like when Samuel L. Jackson was cast as Nick Fury?
idk if this was answered yet. as there are 7 pages of shit i am not really up to reading, but in the (originals or not) nick fury was black, i can't remember if it was the original or not, but for a long time he was black. so they have a legitamate point in picking a black male

either way i dont care, as long as he plays the part good.
 

Miumaru

New member
May 5, 2010
1,765
0
0
I hate when people blow things out of proportion. Besides, its not some historical movie, its a video game movie.
Now if they make a RE5 movie and all the enemies are white, then Id say somethings up, but then again, people got mad cause african zombies were black in the game.
 

beema

New member
Aug 19, 2009
944
0
0
There's no such thing as "persians" anymore. People who call themselves "persian" are just Iranians too scared to reveal their heritage for fear of racist/xenophobic backlash (a reasonable fear in this day and age, I guess). Or just douchebags. So whatever.
Also it's a dumbass movie based on a video game. Who the hell cares? It's not like it's ever going in to the annals of time as an example of great cinema. It will be forgotten about within a year, so why bother making a big stink?
Why not complain about the fact that the entire cast uses really bad fake British accents the whole time too? How does that make any sense?
For that matter, why aren't these douchebags getting up in arms about the Karate Kid remake, which stars Jackie Chan and takes place in fucking CHINA, neither of which have anything to do with KARATE.
 

Siberian Relic

New member
Jan 15, 2010
190
0
0
This moron's entire argument is undermined by the fact that PERSIA NO LONGER EXISTS and therefore makes finding a Persian actor IMPOSSIBLE.
 

Eldritch Warlord

New member
Jun 6, 2008
2,901
0
0
MatsVS said:
Eldritch Warlord said:
MatsVS said:
obliviondoll said:
ANCIENT Persia, not MODERN. THEY WERE CONSIDERED WHITE. Even Modern Persia (now officially called Iran, but Persia is sometimes used too) has a good number of fair-skinned people. The majority of the darkness of their skin comes from living in a desert.
So what? It's still a western actor playing an eastern character. This is not solely a racial matter, but also a cultural and historical one.
The thing is though, the Persian ethnicity originated in what would now be considered part of Europe. Then they migrated south into the Iranian Plateau around three thousand years ago.

Gyllenhaal and Cyrus the Great (founder of the first Persian Empire) could have shared a grandfather from three thousand years ago for all we know.
Which is clearly relevant to current socio-political aspects of the discussion in question.
It's very relevant to a discussion about someone complaining about a white guy playing an ancient Persian, because an ancient Persian would be a white guy. I know that's not exactly common knowledge but it's been said on every page of this thread besides the first.

The simple and obvious fact of the matter is that this is not whitewashing, this is just good casting.
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
Okay. I'm guesses this isn't malicious though. I'm going to say white privilege and execs not even seeing there blunder and leave it at that.
 

Lynxan

New member
Dec 6, 2009
82
0
0
Nomaic said:
This moron's entire argument is undermined by the fact that PERSIA NO LONGER EXISTS and therefore makes finding a Persian actor IMPOSSIBLE.
Chuckles, "Yep, next we will need real Navi if they make another Avatar since CG them like that put them all out of work for the film."
 

Aurgelmir

WAAAAGH!
Nov 11, 2009
1,566
0
0
Well considering that the Prince isn't really of royal blood, and in fact adopted, he doesn't need to be Persian.

That said, I too sort of thought about this when I watched the movie, but then I thought:
Well how many really good Persian actors are there in the US?

Sure there might not be that many, because they are never cast for big roles... but then again Jake Gyllenhal looks the part if you ask me.
 

Legend of J

New member
Feb 28, 2010
724
0
0
I feel that jake wasent the best guy to cast for the movie anyway im trying to think of a movie where he was actually good in it...donnie darko is the only one which comes to mind.
 

Kiju

New member
Apr 20, 2009
832
0
0
Aaaaaactually, I kinda agree with this argument. Casting a white actor for a Persian character would be like replacing Jackie Chan in Rush Hour with Chuck Norris. (Please, no Chuck Norris jokes you uneducated, dickwashed jerk-offs. You know who the hell you are.)

Honestly, I do kinda hate when they do something like this. Admittedly, it's partially because such actors are hard (if not impossible) to come by. It's understandable if you're hiring...say...a Chinese actor to play a Japanese part, for instance. It's not exactly the same, but it's fairly close (apologies to both examples). They could have at least hired someone in the general ethnic group, instead of using white-y.
 

Aureli

New member
Mar 8, 2010
149
0
0
Hurr Durr Derp said:
http://cdn.mqstatic.com/files/alwayswatching/images/1101.jpg
You know, if you look carefully, even though their skin tone is wrong, their facial features are correct.
 

pigmypython

New member
Jan 15, 2010
232
0
0
Who cares if he's white? Truth is that part of the North American audience spends the most money and if Hollywood thinks they need a white actor, well it's their money and their film.