LOL Same dude XD I'd love to be an English OrcDTWolfwood said:im totally for an english orc! Everything else boooo! XD
That and the last panel made me burst into laughter
LOL Same dude XD I'd love to be an English OrcDTWolfwood said:im totally for an english orc! Everything else boooo! XD
Some Indians (as in actual friggin Indians, not Native Americans ) have brown hair, myself included.manic_depressive13 said:*Bursts in way too late*
What are you talking about? Never in my life have a seen a coloured person with brown hair. Every single one I've seen has had BLACK hair. I just find it odd that you would elaborate so much on this point when it is by far the weakest and most nonsensical. I am pasty white and have curly brown hair. So all in all both the "red cheeks" and "brown hair" imply a fairer-than-black complexion, otherwise they would have black hair and the redness in the cheeks wouldn't be apparent.Soylent Dave said:The only bit of that which you can infer as "so they're white" is 'red-cheeked' - but white people don't have a monopoly on red cheeks; it's just more obvious the paler you are.JRR Tolkien said:[They had] thick curling hair [on] their heads, which was commonly brown.
[...] Their faces were [...] broad, bright-eyed, red-cheeked...
Not too mention that white humans don't generally have 'thick, curly, brown hair' - not unless there's some non-white ancestry involved in the not-all-that-distant past. But that's conjecture as well, because we're talking about hobbits, and they can have curly hair just because.
-
In summary then, Tolkien describes Hobbits of the Shire as having :
1. Thick, brown, curly hair
Now, I coulnd't care less if they cast a black person as a hobbit, but really, try to have some basis in your arguments.
No, no, no. You miss the point here.CitySquirrel said:This is actually the definition of racism... the belief that behavior is defined by race.previous poster said:If I was born black my personality would be different, just in the same way if I was born a woman. Our skin colour partly defines who we are, its not a big factor but still a factor none the less
The point being that Harfoots are browner than the other two hobbit varieties - which clearly indicates that Hobbits of the Shire are not uniformly pale and white.matrix3509 said:The problem is that the Harfoots are described as "browner of skin". Browner than what exactly? Browner than orcs? Browner than Haradrim? Of course not. What he means is browner than Fallohides. Which could mean any number of things.Soylent Dave said:snip
Harfoots = Browner
Haradrim = Brown
So who the hell is darker than who? Its pretty obvious from the context of those quotes you so willfully removed them from.
The point I was making there is that curly brown hair indicates more recent black (or brown) ancestry. Yes, even if you have very white skin (I know people with black grandparents who are as white as me, and I'm Gollum-levels of pale...).manic_depressive13 said:*Bursts in way too late*
What are you talking about? Never in my life have a seen a coloured person with brown hair. Every single one I've seen has had BLACK hair.Soylent Dave said:white humans don't generally have 'thick, curly, brown hair' - not unless there's some non-white ancestry involved in the not-all-that-distant past.
[...] I am pasty white and have curly brown hair.
there is no evolution in LotR, gods made everything.SirCannonFodder said:I'm not very familiar with LotR mythology, so perhaps you could explain a few things to me. First, is the Shire the only place where Hobbits are found? If so, is the Shire located on an isolated island or otherwise completely different from the rest of Middle Earth? If the answer to either of those questions is "no", and evolution as we understand it truly takes place on middle earth as you seem to be saying, then I don't see why there wouldn't be non-white Hobbits. If Hobbits aren't exclusive to the Shire, then you likely would see the occasional non-white, just as you saw the occasional Moorish merchant/travelling scholar/physician in Medieval England. If they are supposedly exclusive to the Shire, and the Shire isn't geographically isolated and/or unique in some way, then it's likely that other Hobbit-like peoples would have evolved to fill the same evolutionary niche that Hobbits filled in the Shire, similar to Neanderthals in our world. That is, of course, assuming that evolution in LotR works in the same way as on our world, if at all, but if it doesn't, then it somewhat damages your "evolved the skin pigment" argument.Gingerman said:Here's another great idea! lets take a race that lives in a country with a similar climate to England and throw the occasional black person in! Oh wait that makes no sense as that race wouldn't of evolved the skin pigment because the sun isn't that strong in the setting they're in.