Grey Carter said:
The home improvement channel would be vastly improved by the occasional utterance of "************."
"Now apply your second coat of varnish... motherfuckers."
"As you can nicely see, that asshole here forgot to properly insulate his fucking windowframes and as a result, the goddam heat is just going right the fuck out."
Grey Carter said:
Seriously though, any utility you get from the ESRB website when it comes to content could be fufilled twice as well by a decent review which considers context and atmosphere. (Best example I can think of is despite having the same age rating there is a huge difference between say... Manhunt and San Andreas.) And as a guide for parents the ratings are far too easily abused.
I disagree. I actually believe it would be a terrible idea to have the ESBR consider context and atmosphere. Not only would it mean a vast increase to their workload (they would need to decide for seperate occurences of violence, swearing etc., whether or not they are contextualized in a way that either diminishes or increases their problematic nature), it would also add an element of arbitrariness and subjectivity to their ratings.
Context and atmosphere cannot be judged with complete objectivity,
whether there are boobs, decapitations and sex in a game, can be.
And ultimately, I think most people want the ESBR to make objective assessments, based on transparent criteria (though those may seem silly to some), not write critical essays on the difference in tone and atmosphere between Manhund and San Andreas and how said difference relates to the portrayal of violence.
Edit:
I should probably add that I believe the IDEAL case would be, if parents pay attention to the ESBR rating AND read some reviews of the game they are about to buy.
Because ultimately, I do believe context and atmosphere are important.
I just don´t believe, due to the problems mentioned above, that the ESBR is the right entity to handle those issues, nor can it ever be.