Yeah...the first paragraph of the article in your link sounded like bullshit conservative anti-abortion and anti-contraceptive propaganda to me, so my mind immediately shut down after that. Whether or not that WSJ article is true (even though WSJ is also a conservative newspaper, so I'll take that with a grain of salt, too), I don't rightly know. Plus, that was 13 years ago; even if their policies were like that, they most likely have changed by now.rhizhim said:no fucking way i am going to throw any fucking cent in that fucking jar just for shit and giggles and no fucking clear idea what exctly unicef is going to do with my shitty money.
not since other organisation have done more harm than good with it and other controversies around unicef has started to emerge.
http://www.all.org/article/index/id/MjQyNgDecember 2000: The Wall Street Journal revealed UNICEF's mission to discourage AIDS positive mothers from switching to infant formula. By the UN's own statistics, an estimated 3.4 million children had contracted AIDS from their mothers and died. Between 1.1 and 1.7 million of those children, mostly in Africa, were believed to have been infected with HIV through breast-feeding. Yet, while Nestle and Wyeth, the leading manufacturers of infant formula in the United States, were ready and willing to provide free formula, UNICEF adamantly refused to support their offers. (17)
also:
http://cf.broadsheet.ie/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/swear.jpg
OT: No fucking way am I doing this. I'm a grown-ass adult, I'll curse if I want to, and I'll be goddamned if I give one motherfucking cent up of my hard-earned cash just for some dumbass swear jar, even if it donates to a well-respected charity.