D&D: THAT person in the group

[Zantos]

We don't really have one of those guys. We all, including the DM, will joke about and have a laugh, but not in any way that ruins the game. My character is a Goliath tank with a bloody big axe, who makes an axe pun with every killing blow. "Let me axe you a question!" "A most axe-ellent battle!". I do stop if I run out though.

When we play Dark Heresy it's a different matter. Everyone is one of those guys. Still, it works and we have fun.

 

[Pat8u]

sadly Ive never played DnD I have always been meaning to and my friends all want to but for some reason we haven't.

 

[Adeptus Aspartem]

Sorry to interrupt.. but isn't D&D the perfect game for doin' bullshit?
It's so over-the-top stereotypical, who can't resist to go all bonkers in this system.

It's a basically a pen and paper sandbox hack n' slay.

<3 my Kenku warrior.

 

[EHKOS]

I think what you are referring to in tabletop gaming is called a "Malkavian". I play with at least one everytime. Usually me and me.

 

[Quakester]

My old group had two of "THAT" guys for completely different reasons. The first was a rules lawyer who could min/max the hell out of a character but never really did. He usually just found a concept for a character he liked then ran with it to the extreme. His characters did tend to end up a little to a lot overpowered but that was never really his intent. His downfall was that no matter how good his saves, he would always fail a crucial save to resist a compulsion to kill the rest of the group. He would then proceed to slaughter everyone and resist every attempt to break the compulsion. It was never intentional, the dice just hate him. We'd face vampires, they'd try to dominate him and we'd know the 1 was coming.

The other tried to be a rules lawyer but always missed a critical sentence in any description. It turned out that no matter how sure he was he was almost always wrong. For example, back in 2nd edition, the party had to cross a fairly wide river. Two of us had rings of jumping and hopped over to secure a line for the rest of the party to pull themselves across. My buddy, who at the time was a dwarf in full plate, thought he'd simply use his ring of water walking to walk right over. I reminded him (and our DM) that at the time, dwarves had a 10% chance of any magic item that wasn't armor or a weapon would fail. He laughed and said (and I quote), "What are the odds of that happening?". He proceeded to roll a 7%, fell thru the water and we all reminded him that the odds were 10%. We spent the next few minutes scrambling to save him before he drowned.

 

[RJ 17]

I was a pretty ruthless DM back in the days when I played D&D, and yet everyone always wanted to play my games because, challenging and a bit silly at times, they were always the best (probably because I was so good at writing a narrative). "The DM Giveth, the DM Taketh Away" was my motto...I'd have instant/unavoidable death traps that were rather easy to fall into, and yet I also was pretty generous with loot dispersal. Allow me to give an example of both.

Deep within a cave the party I was DMing for once found an ancient hidden temple. The insides of the temple were still mostly intact and bathed in a golden light that seemed to come from nowhere. At the heart of the temple was a Goblet of Immortality. All one had to do was drink from it to gain unending life. And it worked! The first player took a sip from the completely unguarded goblet and was promptly turned undead. The golden light that filled the temple was sanctifying energy that reduced any undead caught within it to a pile of ash. >:3

Now for an example of my generouosity, when defeating a boss or finding a very well hidden treasure, there was a chance that Lil Flubber Blubbs could appear. LFB was a cute baby harp seal covered in white fur and was just absolutely adorable...and utterly indestructible. Any attack levied against it is returned by a magnitude of 5. But LFB is never there to fight, he's quite docile, actually, and loves giving out presents! Go up and rub his belly and roll your dice, see what happens! Oh look! He caughed up a legendary "Sword of Infinite Awesomeness!" Or even better: "Shield of Yo' Momma!" Along with amazing stats that I forgot since it's been so long, it also makes you immune to Yo' Momma insults!

 

[DrgoFx]

How very off-topic of you. I believe he was asking about "That guy" in "DnD" not "WoW".

I interpreted it as a "So this happened to me. Your gaming in RPGs with groups?" But that's just me, I have weird perspectives.

As far as actual DnD...there's not really any story except I did have one friend who would always cast magic missle when he had nothing to attack. Then we'd get surrounded by mobs, and I'd try my best to stay quiet while our one rogue would rage countlessly because at the time, he was not well built. I was a Paladin. A Warforged Paladin. Odd, I know.

 

[BlindTom]

One particular party I know of has this tendency to go a bit overboard with the pacifism thing. If they meet anything that expresses any kind of intelligence then they always stabilise it and/or tie it up before moving on. There was a girl in the party who would regularly pass me notes, Paranoia style, informing me that she slits all their throats and leaves them in compromising positions. The group spent a very long time convinced that they were being followed by some kind of perverse butcher without ever realising that the group mage was just a little unstable. She had to take a few alignment checks too after the party subdued a pair of lawful good monks following a "misunderstanding." (They rescued a villain upon discovering that turning him in was going to lead to his execution)

 

[Blunderboy]

Threads like these make me really want to try pen and paper RPGs. The sense of freedom sounds incredible.

Captcha - Gone Dolally.
How apt.

 

[Fappy]

I had a guy in a Star Wars game I was running who tried to convince me to let him dual-wield double sided lightsabers... *sigh*

 

[pffh]

I had a guy in a Star Wars game I was running who tried to convince me to let him dual-wield double sided lightsabers... *sigh*

Don't see why that wouldn´t be possible. The -8 to hit and the fact that he could still only attack with one end of each saber at a time would make it look badass but be functionally useless.

 

[YawningAngel]

We have seven of us! My entire group is people who screw around, works nicely enough.

 

[Fappy]

I had a guy in a Star Wars game I was running who tried to convince me to let him dual-wield double sided lightsabers... *sigh*

Don't see why that wouldn´t be possible. The -8 to hit and the fact that he could still only attack with one end of each saber at a time would make it look badass but be functionally useless.

He wanted to be able to attack with both sides of each saber in the same round. I told him he'd end up chopping himself in half

 

[Micalas]

I had a guy in a Star Wars game I was running who tried to convince me to let him dual-wield double sided lightsabers... *sigh*

Don't see why that wouldn´t be possible. The -8 to hit and the fact that he could still only attack with one end of each saber at a time would make it look badass but be functionally useless.

He wanted to be able to attack with both sides of each saber in the same round. I told him he'd end up chopping himself in half

Theoretically it would be possible. Vertical slash with one end followed up by an "uppercut-slash" with the back end. It would look retarded and not very elegant as far as swordplay goes but it wouldn't cut him in half.

 

[cjspyres]

Sorry to interrupt.. but isn't D&D the perfect game for doin' bullshit?
It's so over-the-top stereotypical, who can't resist to go all bonkers in this system.

It's a basically a pen and paper sandbox hack n' slay.

<3 my Kenku warrior.

I had a guy in a Star Wars game I was running who tried to convince me to let him dual-wield double sided lightsabers... *sigh*

Don't see why that wouldn´t be possible. The -8 to hit and the fact that he could still only attack with one end of each saber at a time would make it look badass but be functionally useless.

He wanted to be able to attack with both sides of each saber in the same round. I told him he'd end up chopping himself in half

Yeah, If I remember correctly, in order to attack with both sides, you have to take a full-round attack, right? And that's just with ONE. It would be near impossible for him to dual-wield two saber staffs AND effectively fight.

 

[Fappy]

I had a guy in a Star Wars game I was running who tried to convince me to let him dual-wield double sided lightsabers... *sigh*

Don't see why that wouldn´t be possible. The -8 to hit and the fact that he could still only attack with one end of each saber at a time would make it look badass but be functionally useless.

He wanted to be able to attack with both sides of each saber in the same round. I told him he'd end up chopping himself in half

Theoretically it would be possible. Vertical slash with one end followed up by an "uppercut-slash" with the back end. It would look retarded and not very elegant as far as swordplay goes but it wouldn't cut him in half.

How is he supposed to block, parry and feint? Melee in most d20 systems is vaguely described and its assumed these kinds of things are happening. He'd be cut to ribbons trying to parry incoming blows without killing himself. Plus it would be murder on his wrists

 

[Bara_no_Hime]

**snip**

I have had a number of "that guys" over the years. As to the type you describe, well...

There was this guy who, whenever he saw an altar - to any god - he would run up, cut himself, and bleed on it (his character, I mean).

Beautific goddess of healing - he'd bleed on her altar.
Horrific elder god of destruction - he'd bleed on its altar.
Gnomish god of commerce - he'd bleed on his altar.

Oh, and one time he had ongoing fire damage, so he decided to put out the flames with his flask of whiskey. Yeah. I was very tempted to kill him off at that point, but one of the other characters aided him before he could do more than get into negative HP.

 

[cjspyres]

I had a guy in a Star Wars game I was running who tried to convince me to let him dual-wield double sided lightsabers... *sigh*

Don't see why that wouldn´t be possible. The -8 to hit and the fact that he could still only attack with one end of each saber at a time would make it look badass but be functionally useless.

He wanted to be able to attack with both sides of each saber in the same round. I told him he'd end up chopping himself in half

Theoretically it would be possible. Vertical slash with one end followed up by an "uppercut-slash" with the back end. It would look retarded and not very elegant as far as swordplay goes but it wouldn't cut him in half.

How is he supposed to block, parry and feint? Melee in most d20 systems is vaguely described and its assumed these kinds of things are happening. He'd be cut to ribbons trying to parry incoming blows without killing himself. Plus it would be murder on his wrists

Really, the only positive to carrying two saberstaffs is that, if you're dual-wielding and someone damages one side of your lightsaber, you can switch to the other. And that's only because you're not required to have both sides on.

 

[Fappy]

I had a guy in a Star Wars game I was running who tried to convince me to let him dual-wield double sided lightsabers... *sigh*

Don't see why that wouldn´t be possible. The -8 to hit and the fact that he could still only attack with one end of each saber at a time would make it look badass but be functionally useless.

He wanted to be able to attack with both sides of each saber in the same round. I told him he'd end up chopping himself in half

Theoretically it would be possible. Vertical slash with one end followed up by an "uppercut-slash" with the back end. It would look retarded and not very elegant as far as swordplay goes but it wouldn't cut him in half.

How is he supposed to block, parry and feint? Melee in most d20 systems is vaguely described and its assumed these kinds of things are happening. He'd be cut to ribbons trying to parry incoming blows without killing himself. Plus it would be murder on his wrists

Really, the only positive to carrying two saberstaffs is that, if you're dual-wielding and someone damages one side of your lightsaber, you can switch to the other. And that's only because you're not required to have both sides on.

Yeah the rules are iffy on if you can do that considering it doesn't really take into account you can "turn off" one side, but if he wanted to do it that way I wouldn't have had a problem. I could be a total dick and have an enemy activate the other side on him at inopportune moments though

The force is a *****.

 

[Micalas]

How is he supposed to block, parry and feint? Melee in most d20 systems is vaguely described and its assumed these kinds of things are happening. He'd be cut to ribbons trying to parry incoming blows without killing himself. Plus it would be murder on his wrists

He's not. I know full well that he would be defensless. That doesn't mean his attack is impossible though. As for his wrists, he could put in his character's backstory that he was a chronic masturbator.