It's not like the kid is handing over physical money; he is just clicking a button on the screen. It's not so unreasonable to assume he wasn't aware actual money was being used. It's easy to look at it as an adult and think "well of course actual money is used" but it's a little different when you were a kid. Did you know everything you know now when you were twelve years old?Signa said:Far easier said that done. Try juggling a career, parenting, and maintaining a household and then tell me how much time and energy you have left to figure out how your kids toys work. Once you know they aren't going to swallow them, there isn't much need to worry. The kid was 12 fucking years old. You can't tell me you know one single damn kid that doesn't know the meaning of money at that age. If he really didn't, then yes, the parents are more to blame than I'm suggesting. But I'm certain the kid was just being a dick.MasochisticAvenger said:Sorry, but if you're not going to take the time to learn how something you're giving your kid works, you really have no one to blame but yourself when things start to go wrong. You can't really turn around and start blaming other people since you were unaware of what might happen. Being a gamer has nothing to do with it: you learn as much as you can about what you're using before you use it.Signa said:I honestly can't blame the dad too much on this one, because I know some people just don't give a shit about games. He probably just set up the system so that his son could play it and be out of his hair. It's irresponsible, no doubt, but I see it as one of those things that you just might not have foreseen as a possibility. As gamers, it's easy to forget that fact because we are so immersed in these systems.
Now the kid on the other hand, is a bastard. There is no doubt in my mind that a 12 year old knows what he's doing with his dad's money. I bet he just wanted to do it while he could get away with it and overestimated his dad's vigilance of his bank account.
I also wouldn't mind pointing a little bit of blame at MS for making their system too easy to buy stuff on, and making child accounts useless. As I understand them, they are practically a Silver subscription with a fee. That doesn't mitigate what the kid did, but it would be nice if their systems were just a bit more consumer friendly. This kind of abuse is practically encouraged with the current system in place.
So it's Microsoft's fault because the system is too easy to use? Should online distributors start putting millions of passwords and biometrics just to stop the few idiots who do stuff like this? As I said in an earlier post, put as many safeguards as you like, people will still do stuff like this and ***** about how the system didn't ask if they were really really really really sure.
And read my post again, I'm not saying MS and every company ever should fix their systems to prevent this. Strawman much?
I'm not sure that is definitely the case, but the blame has to fall on the parents for allowing it to happen. If the kid did it on purpose, he needs to be punished, but the parents allowed this to go on for so long. I'm sorry, but if you can't do something as basic as checking your bank statements once in a while you really have no right to complain. This isn't like the kid spent five dollars, the day noticed and complained to Microsoft. It's a pretty big oversight on the father's part.
I have reread your post. You said Microsoft's system mad purchasing too easy. I replied asking if you were suggesting companies should make things harder to purchase. At what point do you believe companies have "done enough" to prevent unwanted purchases? I'm not really sure how that is a Strawman argument.