I thought AC 2 was really good until the ending. Then the whole experience got ruined, and all the other stuff I had to do to get the final trophies just irritated me.
AC2's ending made me go, "...Huh?!", but it wasn't a deal breaker.
I have, however, had this same kind of experience while playing Viking: Battle for Asgard. Yeah, I know it was lacking in parts, but I still loved it... and then I got to the last stronghold, fought through a piss-poor final boss fight and sat through an ending that literally made me pull out some of my hair. Why do developers do something like this? Why?!
Shooting Salem in the chest and then the other guy in the head.
I got some laughs out of it. I still love the game, and it's probably one of my favorite games right now.
OT: I could care less about Mass Effect 2 spoilers, since I consider myself to be a "Casual Mass Effect 2 player", since I'm not going to go crazy over it, but it looks to be a fun little game to waste some time on.
What I don't get is, he said that if he let go off the button the bomb would explode, but he was never holding it down. So did it blow up or not? So confusing..
In Mass Effect 2 you are going to be able to collect fish from various different places to put them inside a fish tank in your ship. So while human colonies suffer under the Collectors, Shepard will instead be searching the galaxy for rare and exotic species of fish.
Now I actually like pointless collection quests such as this, even more so since it involves fish. But it does seem a tad incredibly ridiculous that Shepard does this during a crisis.
In Mass Effect 2 you are going to be able to collect fish from various different places to put them inside a fish tank in your ship. So while human colonies suffer under the Collectors, Shepard will instead be searching the galaxy for rare and exotic species of fish.
Now I actually like pointless collection quests such as this, even more so since it involves fish. But it does seem a tad incredibly ridiculous that Shepard does this during a crisis.
Shooting Salem in the chest and then the other guy in the head.
I got some laughs out of it. I still love the game, and it's probably one of my favorite games right now.
OT: I could care less about Mass Effect 2 spoilers, since I consider myself to be a "Casual Mass Effect 2 player", since I'm not going to go crazy over it, but it looks to be a fun little game to waste some time on.
What I don't get is, he said that if he let go off the button the bomb would explode, but he was never holding it down. So did it blow up or not? So confusing..
No, he just wanted you to kill your partner. There never was no bomb, because it would of went off if you shot him while he was typing on his laptop. I doubt he could of defused the bomb with a few laptop keys.
The bad guy was pretty laughably evil, since he "Did it to show how people become beasts without laws". Or, in normal people terms, "I did it because the government is bad." In fact, the Russian who saves you in the mall is pretty laughably evil, too, and hard to take seriously when his big evil moment is going to rape a civilian. Ok, let's be frank, the game was a serious of cliches, but it was still fun.
Hmm... maybe I'll get it. I mean, I desperately need a good split-screen co-op games. Maybe if I just cover my ears and shove my face into a pillow during cutscenes I won't be so pissed of at the games story
I wonder if you can have a threesome in Mass Effect 2? OH! or better yet dude sex, can you imagine fox reporting on that after what they did when the original mass effect came out?
In Mass Effect 2 you are going to be able to collect fish from various different places to put them inside a fish tank in your ship. So while human colonies suffer under the Collectors, Shepard will instead be searching the galaxy for rare and exotic species of fish.
Now I actually like pointless collection quests such as this, even more so since it involves fish. But it does seem a tad incredibly ridiculous that Shepard does this during a crisis.
So they have sex in the game.....but you don't see it.
So what's the point? Why fuck with the backstory you have already established about Quarians just to insert a sex scene that you don't even see? This is just silly.
Didn't watch the vid, but I went to the video and thought it really funny they just had a "Are you over 18 button" just skiped to the point. Anyways no I can't think of anytime I have spoiled a game for myself.
Shooting Salem in the chest and then the other guy in the head.
I got some laughs out of it. I still love the game, and it's probably one of my favorite games right now.
OT: I could care less about Mass Effect 2 spoilers, since I consider myself to be a "Casual Mass Effect 2 player", since I'm not going to go crazy over it, but it looks to be a fun little game to waste some time on.
What I don't get is, he said that if he let go off the button the bomb would explode, but he was never holding it down. So did it blow up or not? So confusing..
No, he just wanted you to kill your partner. There never was no bomb, because it would of went off if you shot him while he was typing on his laptop. I doubt he could of defused the bomb with a few laptop keys.
The bad guy was pretty laughably evil, since he "Did it to show how people become beasts without laws". Or, in normal people terms, "I did it because the government is bad." In fact, the Russian who saves you in the mall is pretty laughably evil, too, and hard to take seriously when his big evil moment is going to rape a civilian. Ok, let's be frank, the game was a serious of cliches, but it was still fun.
Hmm... maybe I'll get it. I mean, I desperately need a good split-screen co-op games. Maybe if I just cover my ears and shove my face into a pillow during cutscenes I won't be so pissed of at the games story
You don't really go to Army of Two for the story. It's more of an extremely dumb (As in, the story is dumb, the shooting isn't new, etc.) shooter, that is meant to be played for that section of our brain that likes explosives and fire. The moral choices are actually really good, and they are actually close to being moral choices, not just "Kill or not kill". For example
You can let a tiger in a zoo live. If you let it live, it instead escapes the zoo, and mauls a person. Or, you can kill it, but instead make the tiger population extinct (I'm pretty sure it was a Bengal, the white ones). Also, another choice is that you can let a kid bring you a sniper rifle. If he does, he gets killed while bringing it to you. Or, you can make him stay in the vents, keeping him alive, only to go kill some terrorists later to save his parents. And, my last example: You can shoot the Russian, thus saving the girl he was about to rape. If you let her get away, she in turn is an assassin marked with killing his wife who just had a baby, and the baby. Or, you can let him rape the girl, and his new born child lives.
. They actually give you a sense that whatever you pick will lead to something bigger than the original choice.
Shooting Salem in the chest and then the other guy in the head.
I got some laughs out of it. I still love the game, and it's probably one of my favorite games right now.
OT: I could care less about Mass Effect 2 spoilers, since I consider myself to be a "Casual Mass Effect 2 player", since I'm not going to go crazy over it, but it looks to be a fun little game to waste some time on.
What I don't get is, he said that if he let go off the button the bomb would explode, but he was never holding it down. So did it blow up or not? So confusing..
No, he just wanted you to kill your partner. There never was no bomb, because it would of went off if you shot him while he was typing on his laptop. I doubt he could of defused the bomb with a few laptop keys.
The bad guy was pretty laughably evil, since he "Did it to show how people become beasts without laws". Or, in normal people terms, "I did it because the government is bad." In fact, the Russian who saves you in the mall is pretty laughably evil, too, and hard to take seriously when his big evil moment is going to rape a civilian. Ok, let's be frank, the game was a serious of cliches, but it was still fun.
Hmm... maybe I'll get it. I mean, I desperately need a good split-screen co-op games. Maybe if I just cover my ears and shove my face into a pillow during cutscenes I won't be so pissed of at the games story
You don't really go to Army of Two for the story. It's more of an extremely dumb (As in, the story is dumb, the shooting isn't new, etc.) shooter, that is meant to be played for that section of our brain that likes explosives and fire. The moral choices are actually really good, and they are actually close to being moral choices, not just "Kill or not kill". For example
You can let a tiger in a zoo live. If you let it live, it instead escapes the zoo, and mauls a person. Or, you can kill it, but instead make the tiger population extinct (I'm pretty sure it was a Bengal, the white ones). Also, another choice is that you can let a kid bring you a sniper rifle. If he does, he gets killed while bringing it to you. Or, you can make him stay in the vents, keeping him alive, only to go kill some terrorists later to save his parents. And, my last example: You can shoot the Russian, thus saving the girl he was about to rape. If you let her get away, she in turn is an assassin marked with killing his wife who just had a baby, and the baby. Or, you can let him rape the girl, and his new born child lives.
. They actually give you a sense that whatever you pick will lead to something bigger than the original choice.
I thought AC 2 was really good until the ending. Then the whole experience got ruined, and all the other stuff I had to do to get the final trophies just irritated me.
Same here but still, what an ending! While the rest of the AC games are awesome, those endings are the prime example of a WTF moment
I mean seriously, we go from an order of Templars trying looking for a piece of Eden to the world ending!? How in the Nine Howling Hells do they connect those two!?
In Mass Effect 2 you are going to be able to collect fish from various different places to put them inside a fish tank in your ship. So while human colonies suffer under the Collectors, Shepard will instead be searching the galaxy for rare and exotic species of fish.
Now I actually like pointless collection quests such as this, even more so since it involves fish. But it does seem a tad incredibly ridiculous that Shepard does this during a crisis.
So they have sex in the game.....but you don't see it.
So what's the point? Why fuck with the backstory you have already established about Quarians just to insert a sex scene that you don't even see? This is just silly.
yep aparently its like that with the other love interests as well the scene starts and the camera pans away to some furniture or something i really hope im wrong but they announced it in an article late 2009
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
