I enjoyed Dead Island, it had its short comings, but I did go back to it for the last month while waiting for Diablo to go live.
It doesn't really need a sequel.
It doesn't really need a sequel.
My problem is that when fighting Zombies guns are pretty much worthless as a Headshot does not kill them and most of them are weaker than most melee weapons at the same level, so unless you were Purna, there is very little reason to use them. The guns should have been a lot rarer and did a lot more damage to zombies.Korten12 said:Guns are useful, just more so against other humans then the zombies. Although I will admit that is odd.natster43 said:Well whenever they do get to making it, they should work on making the next one more story driven, change the fucking scaling, and improve the gameplay a bit, also make guns useful ever. Either way I would probably buy it as long as it doesn't look terrible since I do like the first one a lot.
Don't get me wrong I am not so arrogant to assume everyone has my particular tastes, but they both failed me for the same reason which is why I mentioned Brink. They had true potential to not only break the monotony of current gamming but also be good. In the end they both felt like rushed games though. Bad story, shoddy controls, glitches, etc.WanderingFool said:Well, I enjoyed Brink, so I think its suffice to say that your list doesnt encompass the whole of gamers tastes... though I do actually agree some on Dead Island. There may have been some fun aspects, but the broken shit clouded the good...Sarge034 said:Do people really want a Dead Island 2? Dead Island came in just behind Brink on my "bad game purchases of the year" list. And yes... I really have that list. -.-