Oh, man does that piss me off when people do that. They get all on their high horse because "I... HAVE... KIDS!!!!!" Okay, I have free time, disposable income, and I don't have to make convoluted plans just to have time for myself. But I'm sure kids are great...poiumty said:From what i understand, the protection instinct comes after a certain age, and coming into direct contact with children can serve to nurture and enhance it. You probably don't have kids of your own, so you're (like me) still insensitive to this. This is why people keep saying "have kids and then talk" which is funny because it doesn't make the sentiment any more rational. It's just an argument relying on you being as irrational as they are.
Yeah, and I see that, but the fact that there is somebody who already made their footing and is already helping the community... that means more to me than the potential to do the same.But there is some logical upside to protecting a child: that child could potentially reach great heights in life and serve mankind better than most. Death eliminates the potential, hence death is undesirable.
Also, who knows? If you let the firefighter die, 20 children could die because he wasn't there to save them. I just really don't see the need to save the child (that is, if I couldn't save both. I'm not heartless).