Cats are entertaining enough as it is without getting them to freak out. See boxes, gift bags, string, laser pointers for more.
You'd be amazed.Du Svardenvyrd said:Who knew that people really needed advice beyond the, "Don't be a jerk..." part.
This guy only feeds his cats at specific times? Talk about a controlling jerk! My cat's freak out if they can see the bottom of the food dish. Outside of the regular dry food bowl they've also conditioned me to give them their Greenies (softish dry dental treats) first thing every morning, and to maintain some sense of human dignity it's a constant struggle to maintain evening fancy feast to be every second day. Although again they've conditioned me there to dispense the fancy feast immediately upon return from my two weekly sporting events, so it's impossible to keep it strictly at every second evening.MysticSlayer said:[
With all that said, I think that this video made a decent point:
Basically, it's very easy to be entertained by a cat in ways that the cat also enjoys and won't potentially harm them. With so many of those ways, it would probably be best to avoid going to these measures to get a quick laugh.
Cats are in general creatures of habit to the point of obsessive compulsive. Feeding his cats at specific times is how they're used to it and it's more about keeping them calm by maintaining the routine than being a "controlling jerk." Your cats on the other hand are used to having food in the dish at all times. There's nothing wrong with either method, it's just the cats are used to different things.RandV80 said:This guy only feeds his cats at specific times? Talk about a controlling jerk!
I've read in a few places that it is potentially better to put cats a "rigid" feeding schedule. In other words, don't leave the food bowl out, minimize how often they receive treats, etc. Part of it is for health reasons (e.g. the cat is less likely to overeat), and some believe it minimizes their late-night "rampages" around the house, provided the last feeding time is early enough. I don't remember all the details, though, as it's been a while.RandV80 said:This guy only feeds his cats at specific times? Talk about a controlling jerk!
If the cat heard you placing something near her that would be the reaction. They get scared when they have absolutely no idea that something in their environment and so close to them has changed. They're all autistic basically.fix-the-spade said:I just tested this on my cat.
The internet is full of lies and the cucumber was met with mild interest at it's sudden appearance followed by utter disdain once it was established as inedible.
Except that cats are not humans and their mentality and phsyce does not work exactly the same way as ours does.lacktheknack said:Yesterday, I put an eyeless garden gnome in my dorm-mates bed. He freaked out.
He is now OK.
If I continued to put the gnome in places that he didn't expect it, that would do bad things to him emotionally, and make me a jerk. As it is, having happened once, it's a joke at his expense that even he found funny in post.
Not everything's even a fifth as critical as people nowadays would want you to believe.
No danger of that, she's deaf as a post.Adam Jensen said:If the cat heard you placing something near her that would be the reaction. They get scared when they have absolutely no idea that something in their environment and so close to them has changed. They're all autistic basically.
If putting a cucumber behind a cat once or twice is considered "cruelty", then no one should have cats. The end. Do you know what they have to go through even in a particularly calm and quiet home?Seraj33 said:Except that cats are not humans and their mentality and phsyce does not work exactly the same way as ours does.lacktheknack said:Yesterday, I put an eyeless garden gnome in my dorm-mates bed. He freaked out.
He is now OK.
If I continued to put the gnome in places that he didn't expect it, that would do bad things to him emotionally, and make me a jerk. As it is, having happened once, it's a joke at his expense that even he found funny in post.
Not everything's even a fifth as critical as people nowadays would want you to believe.
I think people tend to humanize their pets or animals in general too much. Believing they will be grateful for things we would be or let things go we would be able to let go off.
Cats are cats, not humans.
In this case, it simply makes more sense that by scaring the cat while it is doing something such as eating, you are making that cat feel unsafe. Now the cat will know that "once I got attacked at that feeding place. If I wish to eat there again, I must be on my guard."
Feeding is in already instingtively a nervous thing to do for any animal as it, under wild conditions, puts them in a dangerous position to begin with.
There are several studies and quiet a bit of science behind all this. When my sister studied to become a vet they even got to listen to presentations about how the cat views its domesticated home.
Sure, the cat probably wont DIE from it. But it doesnt have to bleed for it to be cruelty.
Some dumbass probably discovered that cats don't like unnoticed changes to their environment and it just happened to be a cucumber. Do it with most objects and they'll be about the same level of freaked out, scaling with the size/appearance of the object and how on edge the cat is.Silverbeard said:I'm actually very curious about this whole thing: Where did it come from? How did the idea get off the ground?
Just yesterday my work colleagues were passing around videos of cats getting the piss shaken out of them by inexplicable cucumbers while also making plans to do the same thing to their cats.
Where did this come from?
Just to be a jerk in a thread that calls for people to not be jerks, I'll point out that the phrase you're looking for is "counter-productive."an annoyed writer said:You know, maybe I'm just being cynical, but I think that a lot more people tried this AFTER they saw this thread, than before it was posted. Sounds a little counter-intuitive if you ask me.