Delicious ranty goodness

Recommended Videos

Mafoobula

New member
Sep 30, 2009
463
0
0
And I'll let everyone else have a turn, after I've said my shtick.

An Internet connection should never be necessary to install or play a game.
I'm deployed in Afghanistan right now. My Internet exists, though there's very little bandwidth (10-15 guys sharing one satellite signal at any given hour). I really, really want to install Orange Box, Portal 2 and Duke Nukem Forever on my shiny new laptop, EXCEPT all three of these require Steam to be connected and functioning well just so I can install them.
Now, maybe I'm just a curmudgeonly old man of 23 who still remembers exactly what his dial-up sounded like, but right away, that just does not sit well with me. I thought for a second that this sort of thing my be a necessary evil, what with software piracy and all that. Then I remembered that sometimes, a great big middle finger is all the counter-argument I need. Call it false-entitlement if you will, but I still say it's a great load of bovine-fornicating-feces.
But anyway...
I know for a fact that my connection, while slow, is reliable enough, since I can let my computer sit for a few hours to load up a video. Therefore, Steam SHOULD be able to connect, even if it takes a minute, right? I mean, I can even connect to my battle.net account for Starcraft 2, so surely Steam should be alright, too.
Well, no. It isn't. I boot up Steam, and it tells me it's trying to connect to my account. 33 seconds later (yes, I timed it), it gives up and tells me my connection probably just sucks.
Screw. You. Valve. I won't get a good connection until the Q2 of next year.

AND ANOTHER THING!

Why do I sometimes have to keep the game disc in my computer in order to play a game? Bad enough that I have to jump through a few hoops to install a game, including game registration, special memberships (Steam/battle.net) and the omnipresent CD key that, in a futile effort to prevent piracy, is now a minimum of 25 digits long, but NOW I can't play Mass Effect 2 unless the disc is in the drive. Necessary evil, my achin' ass.

I also have Assassin's Creed 1 & 2. You know what it takes to play them? Install (Internet connection not needed at any point) and then hit the icon labeled "Assassin's Creed" and away I go. I could have a music CD in my drive, it'll still play without a complaint. THIS is how I know the problems mentioned above are problems that need not exist.

And yes, I am well aware that there are surely perfectly reasonable explanations for all this arbitrary crap. I don't care. This is a rant, and the point of a rant is to throw up a big damn middle finger in the face of whatever annoys at the moment, and reason be damned.
 

No_Remainders

New member
Sep 11, 2009
1,871
0
0
I occasionally have a problem connecting to steam (especially if I'm using my mobile internet, but sometimes I need to get onto it so I can talk to someone, because my mobile internet gets about 56 KB/s at most download speed, so yeah, it's difficult at best to get onto Steam in that case), but I must say, I can understand Steam needing to be connected to the internet for installation, because the games require Steam to run, and it'd be a bit ridiculous if you could install them without being connected, because people could just download ISOs and install that way, without paying for the game.

I can understand if this rant was directed at Diablo 3, because that REALLY is absurd to the highest degree, but complaining at Valve for Steam? I don't really think that's entirely fair.
 

targren

New member
May 13, 2009
1,313
0
0
No_Remainders said:
I occasionally have a problem connecting to steam (especially if I'm using my mobile internet, but sometimes I need to get onto it so I can talk to someone, because my mobile internet gets about 56 KB/s at most download speed, so yeah, it's difficult at best to get onto Steam in that case), but I must say, I can understand Steam needing to be connected to the internet for installation, because the games require Steam to run, and it'd be a bit ridiculous if you could install them without being connected, because people could just download ISOs and install that way, without paying for the game.

I can understand if this rant was directed at Diablo 3, because that REALLY is absurd to the highest degree, but complaining at Valve for Steam? I don't really think that's entirely fair.
This segues into my rant perfectly. You are saying that Diablo 3 needing a net connection for stupid DRM is 'absurd to the highest degree' but that it's not fair to fault Steam for doing exactly the same damn thing. Because you like Steam, you're willing to hold them to a lower standard, because it's your pet platform. Just like every other Xbox/PS3/Wii/PC fanboy out there, who will demonize the competition for doing the exact same bullshit their guys do, but when it gets turned around "Oh, that's different."

[Note: From this point in the rant onward, 'you' is addressing the general case of the people I am describing, and is not directed specifically at the user quoted above, lest I be accused of flaming]

No, it's not different, it's the same goddamn powerplay, cash-grabbing bullshit, and the only reason they can get away with pulling it over and over again is because of all of you who will buy a lump of shit, sight unseen, as long as it has the right company logo on the box, and you proudly proclaim this, like it makes you anything other than a dipshit fanboy. Of course, when someone else does the same thing with a competing game/system/whatever, you immediately recognize the fanboyism then, since you scream it at the top of your little fanboy lungs.

Take this quote I saw in another thread:

Fanboy dipshit said:
There's talk of $GAME 5 being multi-platform, but I hope it stays exclusive.
If you've ever said anything to that effect, then yes, you're a dick. There's no reason to hope that a game stays exclusive other than to deny those godless infidels who chose the 'wrong' path (the one that's not yours) the game. Congratulations, you are a horrible person and you bring the rest of humanity down by continuing to exist.


You're the same kind of morons who loyally follow any given political party, defending whatever they do and denouncing whatever the opposition does, no matter what it is that they actually do, making your position one of 'doing evil shit is okay, as long as it's OUR guy' that does it.

You're liars, hypocrites, and you are everything that is wrong with the gamer culture, society, and the human race. Extract your heads from your asses, or at least have the decency to suffocate and die in there.

/rant

Ah. That felt good
 

No_Remainders

New member
Sep 11, 2009
1,871
0
0
targren said:
This segues into my rant perfectly. You are saying that Diablo 3 needing a net connection for stupid DRM is 'absurd to the highest degree' but that it's not fair to fault Steam for doing exactly the same damn thing. Because you like Steam, you're willing to hold them to a lower standard, because it's your pet platform. Just like every other Xbox/PS3/Wii/PC fanboy out there, who will demonize the competition for doing the exact same bullshit their guys do, but when it gets turned around "Oh, that's different."
Well. No, not really.

Diablo 3 requires a constant internet connection to play your game.

Steam only requires you to have an internet connection once to verify the game, then you can use offline mode if you wish to play after that. There is a difference.
 

targren

New member
May 13, 2009
1,313
0
0
No_Remainders said:
Diablo 3 requires a constant internet connection to play your game.

Steam only requires you to have an internet connection once to verify the game, then you can use offline mode if you wish to play after that. There is a difference.
No, there isn't. Both require you to check in and ask permission to run your own game, doing nothing to stop piracy, but treating legitimate buyers like the criminals. Whether one is more obnoxious than the other, or one adds features of arguable worth to this permission slip isn't relevant. You're making my point for me.