They can hold off indefinitely. Saw a trailer. Looked one of those games that will show its age in 3 years when the new gen hits its stride. Think Perfect Dark Zero compared to the rest of the games of this generation.
*cough* Rockstar *cough* Take-Two *cough*cough*rhizhim said:at least they are considering it.WashAran said:That still does not mean it is going to happen.
thats more than a lot of publishers and developers even care to think about nowadays.
I wouldn't say PC users always get the shaft really since both consoles and PC sides have always had their ups and downs, it's been like that for years on both sides.Glaice said:Why do PC users usually get the shaft when it comes to newer games also on consoles?
I think they're developing for the "outdated systems" for the main reason that most companies do anything: money. The 360 and PS3 have a HUGE install base. Both consoles are going to see continued support for several years. Not putting a AAA-expensive title on the old consoles would be crazy.Psychobabble said:Great. So these idiots are wasting time developing for two outdated systems that weren't that hot in their prime, that are on their way to the junkyard, AND for the systems will be their replacements. Yeah that makes sense.
I agree that it is about cash, but I am not entirely sure it is to stop competition.synobal said:Whats destiny? Why even bother release for the PC if you're going to release late. You can claim it's all about getting the por done right etc etc but the truth is we all see through it. You don't want the PC to compete with the consoles and eat into your console sales figures. Certainly Microsoft and Sony don't them to. Bottom line is it is about cash.