When will the "tropes=rip-off" idea die down? I once saw a thread accusing Titanfall of ripping off Attack on Titan, despite their similarities being horribly superficial.
The problem is, that's ONE element that the shows particularly have in common, and the only unique element is the suitcase. Unless you count women in refrigerators, but....Ratty said:The part that caught my attention was when the video said "A woman in a suitcase who was the subject of experimentation for the nefarious purposes of a secret cabal", not so much the more generic elements the two shows share
Nash is a moron ranting at morons. He is a complete and utter idiot, as is his disgusting ass of a co-host, and they both will go off berating people when they don't know what they're talking about. They'll then berate people who know what they're talking about. It has nothing to do with them getting suckered in from time to time by fake stories, though there have been instances where they ranted despite the chat telling them it was fake because what's the point of being a budget internet version of Fox News if you can't rant at fake stories once in a while?As for Nash, he gets suckered into false news sometimes but I like WTFIWWY alright, it's the only show I've watched much of in the last 2 years or so since my girlfriend is a big fan of it.
Never. It was a thing before they called them "tropes," and it'll be a thing long after the use of the word "tropes" has wandered into obscurity.TheMigrantSoldier said:When will the "tropes=rip-off" idea die down? I once saw a thread accusing Titanfall of ripping off Attack on Titan, despite their similarities being horribly superficial.
I didn't stop there? What do you mean? I started this thread asking for opinions about an accusation, not making said accusation. Just look at the top of the page, the thread title is "Did Firefly rip off Outlaw Star?" not "Oh my God! Firefly totally ripped off Outlaw Star!" also as I noted the element couldn't have been taken if Whedon was telling the truth when he said that any similarities were just a coincidence. 1 is still more than 0. But again, it's possible they just came up with the same idea independently, or saw it on an earlier source. I haven't seen Firefly and don't plan to anytime soon. So I can't really make a judgement on that.Zachary Amaranth said:The problem is, that's ONE element that the shows particularly have in common, and the only unique element is the suitcase. Unless you count women in refrigerators, but....Ratty said:The part that caught my attention was when the video said "A woman in a suitcase who was the subject of experimentation for the nefarious purposes of a secret cabal", not so much the more generic elements the two shows share
The point being it's not a huge element, one mostly of initial presentation, and it makes for a cool reveal. That specific element may have even been taken, but that's not the case Sage is making and you didn't really stop there.
So people who enjoy what is essentially just a podcast about weird news are morons? Yeah ok.Zachary Amaranth said:Nash is a moron ranting at morons.As for Nash, he gets suckered into false news sometimes but I like WTFIWWY alright, it's the only show I've watched much of in the last 2 years or so since my girlfriend is a big fan of it.
I don't know about any of this apparent drama, and I don't really care. But you're being pretty belligerent and judgmental yourself here.Zachary Amaranth said:He is a complete and utter idiot, as is his disgusting ass of a co-host, and they both will go off berating people when they don't know what they're talking about. They'll then berate people who know what they're talking about. It has nothing to do with them getting suckered in from time to time by fake stories, though there have been instances where they ranted despite the chat telling them it was fake because what's the point of being a budget internet version of Fox News if you can't rant at fake stories once in a while?
If you're going to be an idiot, it's best not to be a belligerent idiot. Nash and Tara are both belligerent idiots. And Tara's just a terrible person.
But it's 10% what you say, 90% how you say it. So getting outraged at stupid people is more important than whether or not they're actually smarter. Or know what they're talking about. Or, yes, the story's real.
First off, given that the two characters and storylines are totally different from that point on, we're talking about a very small thing here. Too small to constitute any more than a homage (if it was copied, which I don't think it was), certainly not a rip-off.Ratty said:"A woman in a suitcase who was the subject of experimentation for the nefarious purposes of a secret cabal".
I agree. Like I said a few times now, I was just looking for elaboration/opinions from people who have seen both series and can more properly compare to the two. Since as I noted I only had access to a very cursory comparison, and that particular point seemed very specific in the context of that comparison.Eamar said:First off, given that the two characters and storylines are totally different from that point on, we're talking about a very small thing here. Too small to constitute any more than a homage (if it was copied, which I don't think it was), certainly not a rip-off.Ratty said:"A woman in a suitcase who was the subject of experimentation for the nefarious purposes of a secret cabal".
Secondly, while these scenes stick in the mind and are dramatic, they're not all that unique when you break them down. Characters who have been tortured/driven mad/somehow fundamentally altered by the Big Bad are a staple in thrillers and sci fi. Hell, carrying out unethical experiments on humans is practically a requirement for evil sci fi organisations (bonus points for women and/or kids, since they tend to be perceived as somehow more innocent).
That just leaves the suitcase/box thing which, again, is nothing new really. It's a twist on the "dead body stuffed into a suitcase" trope that comes up all the time in crime dramas (and occasionally in real life, of course). The Firefly scene certainly wouldn't have the impact it does if the audience wasn't aware of the trope, as the whole sequence gains its effectiveness from toying with our expectations.
So again, it may seem initially that there are some weirdly specific similarities, but actually they're all built from a common "language" of tropes drawn not only from the space western subgenre, but from storytelling in general.
I could see that turning into a round of complains about how chick movies are boring.thaluikhain said:Oh that's an idea...do a WW movie, but during a time where nothing heroic is going on, and she's just dealing with whatever secret identity she's got going on.Zachary Amaranth said:Yes, but it's a girl, so it's different. I hear he wanted to do a Wonder Woman movie, and if there was an ass-kicking woman in that movie, it would just prove how generic and samey Wheedon characters are. Even worse if she wore something skintight or revealing.
Your "evidence" was a video which went into great detail about all the various similarities.Ratty said:I started this thread asking for opinions about an accusation, not making said accusation.
Wait, he's ranting at the audience? Here I thought he was ranting at the people from the news articles.So people who enjoy what is essentially just a podcast about weird news are morons? Yeah ok.
I think you're projecting, here.I don't know about any of this apparent drama, and I don't really care. But you're being pretty belligerent and judgmental yourself here.
Except that as I just said I wasn't making an accusation but merely asking for opinions from more informed individuals. I don't need "evidence" to ask a question. And even if I had been making an accusation as I said many times in this thread I have not seen Firefly, so I would be woefully unprepared to do so.Zachary Amaranth said:Your "evidence" was a video which went into great detail about all the various similarities.Ratty said:I started this thread asking for opinions about an accusation, not making said accusation.
You could have made the case for the women in suitcases yourself.
Well isn't that kind of thinking convent. If they say yes I'm right, if they say no I'm right.Ratty said:Yeah, it was just the fact that apparently Whedon has stated more than once that the plot similarities between the two are purely a coincidence that got me thinking. I mean that's a specific denial which says that there was no influence, which if something was borrowing influences would, at least to my mind, change it from a homage or simple inspiration to a rip-off.
Huh? How do you mean? If it is pure coincidence then it is. If I remember right (this was a month or two ago) I was responding to someone saying that they didn't think it was a "ripoff" per se but that it might have taken "some inspiration". I was merely saying that if someone were, hypothetically, to take inspiration from a work and then specifically deny that inspiration it would constitute a ripoff. But if the similar scenes are pure coincidence, which the consensus seems to indicate, then it's not a ripoff at all.Eddie the head said:Well isn't that kind of thinking convent. If they say yes I'm right, if they say no I'm right.Ratty said:Yeah, it was just the fact that apparently Whedon has stated more than once that the plot similarities between the two are purely a coincidence that got me thinking. I mean that's a specific denial which says that there was no influence, which if something was borrowing influences would, at least to my mind, change it from a homage or simple inspiration to a rip-off.