Did Ineffective Monetization Kill Star Wars: The Old Republic?

Recommended Videos

Ryan Hughes

New member
Jul 10, 2012
556
0
0
Pyro Paul said:
The MMO buisness model in and of itself is sustainable as proven with WoW and Eve online. The issue isn't with the buisness model but with the way individual developers approche the problems in a saturated MMO market. Rather then evolving the proven formula they are simply adding to it in an attempt to draw a lions share of the market.

It is a problem in every saturated market... rather then evolving something to the next step, they spend their time trying to out-do every one else to be come the biggest name on the block.

And this will be a problem so long as WoW remains the largest MMO.

once WoW dies we will probably see the next evolution of MMO pushing more boundries, such as player footprints.
WoW and Eve online have proved the opposite. They have proved that the business model is unsustainable. Sure, they have lasted a few years, but they cannot last 15 years, nor even 10. That is what it means to be "unsustainable" as opposed to "dead."
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,308
0
0
DVS BSTrD said:
Subscription models are like the Highlander.
THERE CAN BE ONLY OOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNE!
But there's two Highlanders, the demoman being the second one :U.

There can be ONNLLLAH ONNNNNE! .......Eye.

I heard it was a lot of problems ranging from updates not patching problems, huge imbalance issues not being addressed and no new content. But I didn't play it this is just what I heard from a friend who did play it.
 

nasteypenguin

New member
Mar 2, 2011
94
0
0
Ryan Hughes said:
WoW and Eve online have proved the opposite. They have proved that the business model is unsustainable. Sure, they have lasted a few years, but they cannot last 15 years, nor even 10. That is what it means to be "unsustainable" as opposed to "dead."
Isn't that purely speculation your doing there? I don't know about Eve but I'm pretty sure WoW is still doing well enough to sustain itself at the moment. It may not have the players it used to but you can't presume it will suddenly become bankrupt in the near future because of that, could even just be a lull. It may not have proven sustainable, although you'd have to tell me how long it needs to live to actually prove that, but it certainly hasn't proven anything unsustainable yet.
 

Ryan Hughes

New member
Jul 10, 2012
556
0
0
nasteypenguin said:
Ryan Hughes said:
WoW and Eve online have proved the opposite. They have proved that the business model is unsustainable. Sure, they have lasted a few years, but they cannot last 15 years, nor even 10. That is what it means to be "unsustainable" as opposed to "dead."
Isn't that purely speculation your doing there? I don't know about Eve but I'm pretty sure WoW is still doing well enough to sustain itself at the moment. It may not have the players it used to but you can't presume it will suddenly become bankrupt in the near future because of that, could even just be a lull. It may not have proven sustainable, although you'd have to tell me how long it needs to live to actually prove that, but it certainly hasn't proven anything unsustainable yet.
No. I explained my reasoning earlier, and here is a link to another person's reasoning.

 

Pyro Paul

New member
Dec 7, 2007
842
0
0
Ryan Hughes said:
WoW and Eve online have proved the opposite. They have proved that the business model is unsustainable. Sure, they have lasted a few years, but they cannot last 15 years, nor even 10. That is what it means to be "unsustainable" as opposed to "dead."
... what?

Seriously, what are you talking about?

15 YEARS??
what are you basing this off of?
 

RN7

New member
Oct 27, 2009
824
0
0
The monetization model is what killed TOR, though not because players wanted to blast through the content. The monetization model killed it because it wasn't sustainable. Firstly, the majority of players cared mainly for the story, as the raiding and pvp were subpar. Once the story's done, they leave. Good content wasn't being produced to a sufficient level to keep players coming back. They're still kind of doing it incorrectly, as a player can get from 1-50 and experience the story without paying a cent. They'd have to have some pretty darn good microtransactions to make F2P worthwhile.
 

ReinWeisserRitter

New member
Nov 15, 2011
749
0
0
Being designed by committee is what killed The Old Republic, seeing someone that made a lot of money and saying "Hey! We can do that! And our franchise already makes a lot of money, so that means we'll make even more money!"

I can't tell you how pleased the smug **** in me is that this was not the case.
 

Pyro Paul

New member
Dec 7, 2007
842
0
0
jcb1337 said:
The monetization model is what killed TOR, though not because players wanted to blast through the content. The monetization model killed it because it wasn't sustainable. Firstly, the majority of players cared mainly for the story, as the raiding and pvp were subpar. Once the story's done, they leave. Good content wasn't being produced to a sufficient level to keep players coming back. They're still kind of doing it incorrectly, as a player can get from 1-50 and experience the story without paying a cent. They'd have to have some pretty darn good microtransactions to make F2P worthwhile.
That isn't because the unlimited subscription model is unsustainable... it is that they did not produce or maintain the content that made it sustainable.

A major problem people are running into when developing unlimited subscription based games is that they ignore the single most important facet:

Community IS Content.

the reason Eve has stood the test of time as an unlimited subscription based game is because it does not restrict this single facet. Interaction with other players is what makes the game, be it running with friends or guildmates and creating a massive fleet to take on tough missions or running for your life away from other players who are intent on collecting your corpse and feasting on your delicious tears...

Hell, look at WoW.

What is the primary reason people go back to wow when jumping ship for another MMO?
"Because all my friends are in WoW."


What has failed SW:TOR is that they tried to make Story content the major draw, and the problem with that is that once the story is done, people leave. And rather then developing a game which takes the next step to evolve the 'Community is content' model, they are going through their backlog of games made and trying to add diffrent aspects to draw people back.

an the next Unlimited Subscription based MMO that is successful will have to have 'Community Footprinting'. That is, as players do things to the world, the world changes for every one.

ie: Every one chops wood in this forest, the forest disappears.

it is the next step in the predominant facet 'Community Is Content'...