Discuss and Rate the Last Film You Watched

Is this the first poll?


  • Total voters
    45

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,599
2,505
118
Country
United States
I'd argue the original Candyman was really the first truly successful "urban" horror movie. You had other efforts like Tales from the Hood (by the way, if you like anthology horror movies, and haven't watched Tales From the Hood, fix that shit ASAP), or Leprechaun: In the Hood (which is gloriously cheesy, but not at all a movie to be taken seriously) but Candyman really seemed to grasp the setting and how to use it effectively, not just as a gimmick.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,157
3,895
118
The Monster Club (1981)

Based on stories by Ronald Henry Glynn Chetwynd-Hayes, this film is about a fictional version of the writer (played by John Carradine), who meets a vampire (played by Vincent Price) who takes him to a nightclub full of monsters so he can get good material for his stories. So, anthology horror film with a somewhat different framing device.

Bit odd, in that the nightclub, especially Price, is very silly, 2 of the 3 stories are played seriously for horror. And then you'll get something like Price saying that the bit about a town of cannibals would make a good story, there's no sex or nudity after all, just a it of violence. And the monster stripper who is seen in silhouette taking of her clothes, and then her flesh, becoming a dancing skeleton and causing an appreciative monsters eyes to pop.

The end was cliched (man is the real monster, so the writer gets to be a member of the club), but it's different to the usual cliche ending (the writer gets killed), so there's that. Also, the music is sorta likeable in a camp sorta way.

Apparently the real writer wasn't a big fan, saying only the third story was done well, and I tend to agree, the second was silly and the first rather meh. The third wasn't anything special in regards to story or anything, but well executed.
 

Kyrian007

Nemo saltat sobrius
Legacy
Mar 9, 2010
2,624
704
118
Kansas
Country
U.S.A.
Gender
Male
Stir of Echoes (Sept. 1999)

I saw this in theaters, and have watched it a couple of times since. I watched it again this week, because it is soon to be going away from... Tubi... Crackle... Roku Channel... Favsome... dang, forgot which free ad sponsored app it was available on. Whichever it is, it won't be sometime next week. Anyway, the reason I included the month of release... Stir of Echoes shares some themes and similarities with The Sixth Sense. Which of course came out in Aug. of 1999. And all the freaking hoopla and coverage and buzz around 6th Sense totally overshadowed Stir of Echoes. Which I thought was a crime. Sixth Sense is a poor to average movie written and directed by a man who would become a punchline in Hollywood. Stir of Echoes was adapted from a story written by one of the greats in sci fi/horror, adapted and directed by the ninth most successful living filmmaker (adjusted $ take.) As much as I hate saying "I told you so," history DID kind of prove my point on that one.

Anyway, what is it? Well, psychic kid... sees dead people. That's the similarities with 6th Sense anyway. There's also some sprinkling of "The Shining" vibes here and there as well as potentially a mystery to solve. Oh, and another difference from 6th Sense... Kevin Bacon instead of Bruce Willis. My biggest problem with 6th Sense, if you figure out the "twist" (as I did within the first half hour) the movie has nothing else to give you. Nothing else to say. Meanwhile, somehow Stir of Echoes lets the audience in a little more but manages to still maintain a much better tension... a better atmosphere of horror. Anyway, check it out before its gone. A movie that should have been better remembered, but somehow got overshadowed by a lightning in a bottle flavor of the month, better marketing, and the stupid audience hype machine.

Oh, and there was a direct-to-video sequel. It was garbage.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hanselthecaretaker

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
6,666
4,959
118
Plano, TX
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Spiderhead: What? / Great

Thor operators a research lab that uses prisoners as guinea pigs to test drugs that can alter their moods, attitudes, and behaviors. Ethics ensue.

Really worn out idea that was executed really poorly. Pass.

Final Score: Alright / Great

John Batista is in England visiting the wife and teenaged daughter of his best friend who was killed in combat. He takes the girl to a soccer match where soon after start, he loses her in the crowd, and in his search, discovers the entire stadium is unknowingly held hostage by Russian terrorists looking for a single man in the crowd. Batista becomes the one-man-army trying to save her and the thousands in attendance none the wiser as to their potential fate.

Batiste is the guy you call when Dwayne Johnson isn't available. This is a very silly movie. It takes itself way too seriously for the ridiculousness on display, but the moments of levity Amit Shah's "Faisal" are sometimes worth the price of admission. Can't recommend, but you can easily find worse popcorn fodder.
 

Bob_McMillan

Elite Member
Aug 28, 2014
5,431
2,052
118
Country
Philippines
The Gray Man on Netflix.

Man, Chris Evans is having the time of his life not being Captain America anymore. Anyway, it's a dumb fun action movie. Writing is pretty piss poor and it screams sequel bait, but it has competently shot action and likeable characters. Gosling's Sierra Six is probably the closest attempt at replicating Bourne that I can recall, and man Ana De Armas needs her own damn action movie.

Don't regret watching it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,157
3,895
118
The Woman in Black (1989)

Decidedly meh. Lots of people seem to think it's brilliant though (Del Toro says it's one of his favourite supernatural films, for example), but I'm not seeing what the fuss is about. It goes on and on without much happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gorfias

Piscian

Elite Member
Apr 28, 2020
1,956
2,086
118
Country
United States
Toy Story 4

After rewatching Toy Story 3 I felt a bug to rewatch 4. It's not news that this is the weakest in the series, whats bizarre is that "weakest in the series" amounts to it still being a pretty great movie and worlds above anything else out there non-pixar. The narrative is pretty muddled, fumbling around with woody having an existential crisis about his own self-worth. I'm sure everyone owns the truth on what this movie is even about sub-textually speaking, but I suspect if you ask the writers they'd give you some defensive, but empty platitudes. Each of the 3 previous films were very simply about accepting changing circumstances, with each one commenting on specific life changes. Toy story 4 tries to continue that trend but it's not adding anything clear. If I had to give a thesis on it, TS4 comments mostly on not obsessing over the people and life you've lost as you get older. Man the audience this series left children behind with the first movie. Toy story 4 is like "Ok dude, you got divorced and she took the kids, time to find your favorite ex-girlfriend and move on". I'm being harsh. It works, but the movie is almost entirely chase sequences. I think it would have been a better film if they could be a bit more cohesive with the larger narrative.

Regarding my opening line, its strange to say "This movie sucks....compared to the others". That paws of fury movie is getting dumped on streaming this month despite apparently being pretty large budget. Its getting...less than positive reviews. I was thinking to myself, what consistently sets these movies apart is how much time and energy Pixar spends on molding characters to the voice actor. The emoting and lipwork really makes you feel like you're watching people, putting the character work front and center. You rarely see that in other animated films. Paws of fury in particular, I was watching the trailer and it just looks like a very rough dub. I think subconsciously audiences tune out when it just looks like some generic animated movie that was made and then some actors are paid to dub over it. There's exceptions, I thought whomever worked on Kung-fu Panda did an awesome job. I would be willing to gamble money that you can judge animated movies potential for success or failure based on how much effort is spent in developing the voice actor animation. I think of movies like wreck it Ralph and like yeah, Ralph looks and acts like John C Reilly and so on. Like they thought "who do I want to *play* this character", rather than just voice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gorfias

Bartholen

At age 6 I was born without a face
Legacy
Jul 1, 2020
770
856
98
Country
Finland
Performance (1970), 6/10

This is a british drama about a mob(?) enforcer who screws up and ends up having to go on the run. He ends up shacking with a small group of bohemians, the (sort of) leader of whom is played by Mick Jagger. The best I can describe this movie is a sort of british cousin to Rocky Horror Picture Show sans the musical element, since it's about a straightforward (if massively amoral) bloke coming into contact with the counterculture of the day, and ending up having an identity shift of sorts. It's very weird. To be honest I'm having a bit of a tough time recalling large chunks of this movie, since it abides only loosely to a narrative structure, and spends a lot of its runtime on esoteric dialogue about identity, philosophies and all sorts of hippie stuff. The fact that it's also littered with very very english slang didn't help either, since I could hardly parse the meaning of a lot of the expressions. I guess the big draw here is seeing one of the biggest rock stars of the time in a movie role, and Jagger is sort of "ehh". He certainly draws your attention and I can't say he's bad in the role, but I feel this is a role written more around the actor than as a character in and of itself. He's not very expressive and he's not given a lot of showy moments, but he certainly captures the essence of a hippie weirdo artist.

Perhaps the biggest problem with this movie are roughly the first 20 minutes, before the main character has to go on the run. It's basically a bunch of gangsters being shitty, and we're given basically zero reason to root for or be interested in the protagonist. It's also quite messily edited (probably intentionally) with a lot of names and characters being thrown around, and it's very hard to follow or figure out who's supposed to be important. But once the protagonist shacks up with the bohemians the movie both gains focus and gets more interesting. Considering this movie's over half a century old, a lot of the themes around sexuality, identity and gender feel astoundingly ahead of their time. It's just that a lot of stuff feels kind of pointless. For example, there's a borderline pornographic (for the time) threesome scene between Mick Jagger's character and the two chicks he's living with. It doesn't really establish anything or teach us anything about the characters, but goes on for quite a bit regardless, and I'm just left wondering what the purpose of it was.

To be honest I think this is one of those movies that doesn't really open up on a single watch. Might have to watch it again to really get coherent thoughts on it.

Back to the Future, 10/10

I mean, what's there to even say? It's one of the greatest sci-fi comedies ever made, and one of the central pillars of 80s cinema. The script, pacing, editing, comedy, acting and music are all immaculate. It doesn't feel dated one bit despite closing in on 40 years. There's not a single thing I'd take out of it, everything fits just perfectly. It just oozes charm, wholesomeness and is genuinely romantic. Marty McFly is a perfect everyman protagonist. Genuinely not one single bad thing to say about it, and as a result there's not a whole lot to say or analyze. There's not a lot of big themes or having something to say, but that's fine when the movie is this fucking good. Like Die Hard, this is an all-time classic for a reason.
 
Last edited:

Agema

Do everything and feel nothing
Legacy
Mar 3, 2009
9,241
6,509
118
The Hive (2008)

There are several films called "The Hive". There's a good chance this is the worst. A few months ago, I reviewed some rubbish B-movie with James Van Der Beek ("Eye Of The Beast"?) This turns out to be from the same series - an ongoing project from SyFy to make it's own horror movies about critters eating humans. Oh boy, they are low quality. So, there's this southeast Asian archipelago, and the ants start getting smart and eating the locals, so a team of scientist-exterminators ("The Thorax Team") come to sort them out. Stuff happens, and the movie ends. I suppose it's intended to be a horror movie, but it barely manages that. It's not just cheap and ineffective, it's silly in a way that undermines any sense of horror, because the ants just end up doing ludicrous things. But it doesn't have to be that way, because...

Phase IV (1975)

...the Hive of course is not the first movie about intelligent ants. Back in the 70s, there was this little curio - and one has to suspect whoever scripted "The Hive" had seen it. Phase IV was very much of the 70s Westworld / Andromeda Strain style of SF films. You'll have to bear with me here because it's been well over 20 years since I last saw it so I need to be a little vague, but it stuck with me. It's a bit of a flawed gem. It is the sole film directed by Saul Bass, better known as a graphic designer. On the evidence of Phase IV, Saul Bass was not a great director. But for all that it sort of drifts along a little bit aimlessly, he did make a beautifully designed and really quite eerie film - and that is worth it. There's one scene I found particularly remarkable, where the ants lay out their dead, like a funeral: weird, wonderful and quite moving in a creepy way. I would certainly recommend it for SF fans, even if its appeal outside that in the general public might be a little limited.

I have an ant infestation in my garden every year. Watching these movies does not dissuade me from poisoning them every year, but the little fuckers keep coming back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Specter Von Baren

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,388
1,972
118
Country
USA
Nope: Really Good / Great

Can't say much without spoiling it, but I thought it was really good. Jordan Peele's gotta Jordan Peele from time to time, but he knows how to build tension. Worth it.
Saw this at the theater with the boy this morning. We both loved it. We have to work at it to tell ourselves why the chimp sub plot fits but even this unnecessary side plot added fun and tension to the movie. Jordan Peele is turning into a movie producing treasure. A-.


EDIT: Invited the comic book store guys over to see The Gray Man on Netflix later today. $200 million movie to be released on streaming. Hope to update my thoughts later today.
 
Last edited:

thebobmaster

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 5, 2020
2,599
2,505
118
Country
United States
Saw this at the theater with the boy this morning. We both loved it. We have to work at it to tell ourselves why the chimp sub plot fits but even this unnecessary side plot added fun and tension to the movie. Jordan Peele is turning into a movie producing treasure. A-.


EDIT: Invited the comic book store guys over to see The Gray Man on Netflix later today. $200 million movie to be released on streaming. Hope to update my thoughts later today.

I firmly believe that, if he keeps up with this consistency, Jordan Peele could well be this generation's John Carpenter.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,157
3,895
118
The Hive (2008)

There are several films called "The Hive". There's a good chance this is the worst. A few months ago, I reviewed some rubbish B-movie with James Van Der Beek ("Eye Of The Beast"?) This turns out to be from the same series - an ongoing project from SyFy to make it's own horror movies about critters eating humans. Oh boy, they are low quality. So, there's this southeast Asian archipelago, and the ants start getting smart and eating the locals, so a team of scientist-exterminators ("The Thorax Team") come to sort them out. Stuff happens, and the movie ends. I suppose it's intended to be a horror movie, but it barely manages that. It's not just cheap and ineffective, it's silly in a way that undermines any sense of horror, because the ants just end up doing ludicrous things. But it doesn't have to be that way, because...
Oh, hey, I saw that film. I think it's likely that there is an even worse film with that name, though, but I'm not saying this film was good.

Didn't know it was from a series, just thought it was very formulaic.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,169
4,933
118
Back to the Future, 10/10

I mean, what's there to even say? It's one of the greatest sci-fi comedies ever made, and one of the central pillars of 80s cinema. The script, pacing, editing, comedy, acting and music are all immaculate. It doesn't feel dated one bit despite closing in on 40 years. There's not a single thing I'd take out of it, everything fits just perfectly. It just oozes charm, wholesomeness and is genuinely romantic. Marty McFly is a perfect everyman protagonist. Genuinely not one single bad thing to say about it, and as a result there's not a whole lot to say or analyze. There's not a lot of big themes or having something to say, but that's fine when the movie is this fucking good. Like Die Hard, this is an all-time classic for a reason.
Well, the whole thing with the McFly's just inviting the would-be rapist of their mom into their home like he's the jolly mechanic certainly revealed itself to be very questionable as I got older. I get needing to see Biff working a dead end job and showing George no longer taking his shit, but them just letting him inside the house like nothing happened was fucking weird.

And I will say that even as a kid I found it a bit strange that Marty was just okay being with a version of his family with whom he shares no history or memories at all. They might as well be strangers to him really.

Also Doc, what if those terrorists just shot you in the face, huh?

FYI, this it probably my second favorite movie ever though.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,388
1,972
118
Country
USA
Well, the whole thing with the McFly's just inviting the would-be rapist of their mom into their home like he's the jolly mechanic certainly revealed itself to be very questionable as I got older. I get needing to see Biff working a dead end job and showing George no longer taking his shit, but them just letting him inside the house like nothing happened was fucking weird.

And I will say that even as a kid I found it a bit strange that Marty was just okay being with a version of his family with whom he shares no history or memories at all. They might as well be strangers to him really.

Also Doc, what if those terrorists just shot you in the face, huh?

FYI, this it probably my second favorite movie ever though.
Heck, mom doesn't recall seeing her son in his Calvin's 30 years earlier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Agema

Bob_McMillan

Elite Member
Aug 28, 2014
5,431
2,052
118
Country
Philippines
EDIT: Invited the comic book store guys over to see The Gray Man on Netflix later today. $200 million movie to be released on streaming. Hope to update my thoughts later today.
Jesus, that movie was 200 mil? Sure didn't feel like it, there was plenty of questionable CGI.