Megalopolis
Destined to be ridiculed or admired (or both), I'll give this to Coppola: he made a movie.
Sometimes I'll watch a movie and think it could've been a show, or a show that could've been three movies, or I'll watch something that was better - or would be better - as a play or a book or a comic, or listen to a 4 minute voicemail from my sister that could've been a thumbs up emoji. Megalopolis could only ever be a movie. Not just a Francis Ford Coppola movie, but a movie at all. And this is more than I can say of other much better actual movies: Megalopolis exists in one form alone. There's value in that kind of purity.
Which isn't to say I wasn't bored out of my mind at times. I forget the quote but employ Tenet's "go with the flow", if you find anything flows at all. It doesn't have a plot so much as a manifesto, and that's where the move lives and dies.
It's basically a protracted stalemate between a young visionary architect and the conservative mayor of "New Rome", who wants nothing to do with the sci-fi utopia of Megalopolis. The architect is Cesar (Adam Driver), the mayor is Cicero (Giancarlo Esposito as Himself). And that's pretty much it. Analogies to America's decadence come and go in the form of a dozen stunted subplots, as do characters with ridiculous names that sound like they were cribbed from The Crying of Lot 49, like "Wow Platinum" and "Vesta Sweetwater".
So it's bloated and excessive and kitsch and baroque and it looks like a perfume commercial and everyone's having scenery for their three square meals. Well, I dunno. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone but guess I enjoyed myself when I wasn't bored and thinking of dinner.