Discuss and Rate the Last Thing You Watched (non-movies)

Recommended Videos

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
7,539
5,924
118
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Oh, "Boys," here we go. The new season of The Boys starts in two days. I'm recalling the trauma I suffered when I binged all the earlier seasons to get caught up, and I'm both anticipating and ruing this latest outing. What absolute atrocities is Homelander going to get into to freshly haunt my nightmares? I feel like how the victim of a violent crime must feel when they face their attacker in court on the day of their sentencing; it's finally justice, but when he stares at me from across the courtroom, I'm reminded of the horrors he put me through. Should entertainment give you PTSD like this? I know nothing of what to expect, but if this truly is the last season, Homelander needs to die. I can't live in a world where still he exists without having paid for what he's done, but my luck, it'll end with the possibility that he's still out there, and angrier than ever...
 
Jun 11, 2023
4,258
2,952
118
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Yeah, there's a bit of commentary but it's pretty light. Some say the movie essentially has its cake and eats it too because of this scene and then immediately followed by the vindication. But, it's really the more interesting and fun way to end the movie overall. Funnily, the movie Bugonia is a very same-y situation where the movie can only go 1 of 2 ways and does something similar to The Burbs.

Tom Hanks' best line ever, "I've been blown up! Take me to the hospital!" Then, his wife, Carrie Fisher, also makes the scene by being so mundane about it all.
Apparently he improvised loading himself into the ambulance too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phoenixmgs

Old_Hunter_77

Elite Member
Dec 29, 2021
2,858
2,667
118
Country
United States
Dark Winds, season 4, 8/10

DW is the most consistent show I watch. It's like a solid B+/A-, always, and the kind of TV I appreciate most these days.

It's based on a series of book so each season is basically a book, I think (I never read them). Two Navajo police investigate murders on their reservation in the 1970s, basically.

Season 4 introduces a crazy German lady assassin, relationship tensions between the junior lead and the lady lead, and the existential ponderings of the senior guy.

The show offers a murder mystery thriller situation generally structured in a way you've seen in similar shows. Its uniqueness lies in the setting- Navajo culture, language, and reservation life centered. The show is just solidly and consistently well paced, written and performed.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,067
4,775
118
Started White House Plumbers. It's an HBO miniseries that, broadly speaking, tries to be the Death of Stalin version of Watergate. The problem is, it's kinda hard to top it as a farce. The absurdity of 'Stalin' is fueled by the pettiness and delusions of grandeur of the Soviet apparatchiks that scramble around looking to one-up each other. 'Plumbers' is a comparatively muted affair about the shortcomings of American middle management. It depicts what might be very generously described as the brains of the whole thing, Howard Hunt and Gordon Liddy, as a couple of shmucks who consistently fail upwards because of dumb luck and poor oversight. I guess that's fair because history only remembers them for spectacularly fucking up their one job, but I just don't like that 'let's point and laugh' energy. See Michael Bay's Pain and Gain.
 

Old_Hunter_77

Elite Member
Dec 29, 2021
2,858
2,667
118
Country
United States
Babylon 5 10/10

I'm sure in all my time here I've sung the praises of this show but since I'm rewatching it I figured I'd post about it. This is one of my comfort shows, rewatch it about once every 5 years or so. I love it so much I'm not gonna try to give some objective opinion about it, just gush.

It is my first time viewing it in two new ways for me:
- HD. Some kind of AI upscaling whatevers. It's what's on the blu-ray.
It's a mixed bag- I can tell that some fidelity is lost in the process. But seeing it so clearly is worth it and I'm enjoying it.

- JMS preferred viewing order
So "JMS" is show-runner J. Michael Straczynski. One of the things that made this show unique is that it really is that complete vision and guidance of one person, so it has more consistent, complete, and focused story-telling and chararcter development of any sci-fi show ever made (probably... maybe the Joss Whedon stuff can compare in that sense). So much so that he actually wrote most of the episodes himself.
During the making of the show he also pioneered being active on the nascent internet. He has shared, in bits and pieces, behind-the-scenes info on episodes that were delayed for production reasons, issues that effected the writing (casting, production, etc), and some of his original concepts that were scrapped or changed over the years. Vigilant fans have assembled a viewing order that deviates a bit from the aired order to create what is considered the "JMS viewing order." It includes a few standalone movies and an aborted spinoff series.
I'm watching it this way, minus the spinoffs, minus two episodes that I really dislike and add nothing to the story IMO.

Anyway, for those that no nothing about the show, the premise and setup is basically Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. And they aired together. So yes there's a whole nerd drama about who ripped off whom. At the time, B5 was looked at as the also-ran Trek. Trek was THE space game in town, not like now with so much more content and nerd culture dominating pop culture. It was on a network that went bust and of course had WAY less money to spend.

Certainly the biggest difference between B5 and DS9 is that B5 is literally not Trek, so it doesn't have the themes and lore to contend with. The biggest being that future humanity in B5 is NOT utopian. Fortunately, it's also before the post-9/11 GRIMDARK. So there is conflict, there is idealism and ideologies, there is this overriding sense that humanity can and should progress but it's brutal and painful and ugly.

The biggest most famous selling point is that the story was planned from the get-go so the twists and turns, the changes, mostly make sense by the time you get to the end. It is the most satisfying overall story in any show I've ever watched. Don't get me wrong, I love DS9, but I feel like its last season had a LOT of weaknesses and that some of its big turns towards the end were unearned.

The show's strengths AND weaknesses stem from the same place- that being its singular authorial voice. JMS has a silly sense of humor and some of the jokes fall flat; he has his boomer white guy liberal world view which is generally fine but can get the writing stuck on some annoying repetitive themes. He is a brilliant dialogue writer which leads to some spine-chilling moments but also cringe dialogue at times where it sounds like the character is reciting an essay.

The acting is all over the place, but in a way that I find charming and part of why I keep watching. Most importantly, the main cast is fantastic. Three of the main alien characters- Delenn, G'Kar, and Londo, are the kind of attention-wresting screen mongers we want in our space operas (the DS9 equivalents would be Oda and Quark). The human characters I wouldn't say were ever gonna win Emmys, but they come to take the tropes assigned to them and by the second season invest them with emotion and depth.
Walter Koenig, who played "nooklear wessels" Chekov in the original Trek is a recurring villain and his performance is a revelation. The one-off guest characters are all over the place- some of them are absurd scenery chewers and I admit I love that crap; some are great, some just suck. So it goes.

The space battles are exceptional. In terms of pure graphics, it hasn't aged well- we're talking early computer graphics. What's awesome is how they're choreagraphed and directed. They rarely are just space ships pew pewing each other- they have narrative to them. You can understand what's happening and why, what the strategies are, and there is a thought to physics and positioning that exceeds much Trek even.

Maybe the weakest production point is the alien design. A lot of bulbous head craggy faced aliens. The hair on the character of Londo is notoriously stupid looking. I'm not gonna defend it other than to say at least it's more effort than the B'joran's crinkly nose+earring (the Cardassians, on the other hand, maybe the coolest and most clever design of an important alien race).

So, I guess I'm recommending it, yet again. If anyone is looking to:
- Have a meaty show to sink their teeth into that will entertain them for a while (5 seasons, 22 episodes per)
- Doesn't mind old stuff looking of its time
- Likes some traditional story-telling: epic story, personal stories, war and peace, space shit.

A common observation/recommendation of the show is that it's slow at first and that you have to suffer through the first season before it gets good in the second. I legit think this is just wrong and I really don't think it's just me being a fanboy here. Of those initial 22 episodes, I think three are legit bad (but none are the episodes I skip), half-a-dozen are top notch, and the rest are solid. Yes, seasons 3 and 4 are the peak, and season 5 stumbles out the gate, but overall that's a pretty good hit record.

For reference, the two eps I skip are:
- Deconstruction of Falling Stars, the season 4 finale. This was basically a last-minute filler due to the behind-the-scenes production issues that also greatly hampered the first half of season 5.
- A View From the Gallery, an early season 5 that actually offends me, and not just because it adds nothing to the story or characters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordon_4
Jun 11, 2023
4,258
2,952
118
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Your Friends & Neighbors season 2 opener

Starring Jon Hamm (who also provides narration), Amanda Peet as his ex wife, and Olivia Munn as his one time fling, it involves him getting fired and resorting to moonlighting thievery within his rich neighborhood. It works well as both a nightcap and a couples show, and does a good job setting up the new mark (James Marsden of the Sonic live action series). The draw will be how much depth and angle they give him to continue living up to its billing as a dark comedy.
 
Last edited:

Xprimentyl

Made you look...
Legacy
Aug 13, 2011
7,539
5,924
118
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The Boys: S5:Ep1: Sigh / Great

Homelander's fascist regime is gaining traction even as the reality surrounding him threatens to expose him. And you know what happens when you piss off a petulant man-child...

I already figured these later couple of seasons were direct allegories for Trump and what he's done to America, but in this final season, they're aiming for the nose. Homelander is shown to be directly analogous to Trump in some ways they would almost be comical if it weren't for the violence looming to protect his paper-thin ego, oh wait, that's literally the reality we're living right now!

If Trump railed at South Park for making fun of him, I only imagine everyone around him is keeping him from watching The Boys.
 
Last edited:

Bartholen

At age 6 I was born without a face
Legacy
Jul 1, 2020
999
1,050
98
Country
Finland
Checked out the first 2 episodes of the final season of The Boys. Obviously it's hard to assess a season by just two episodes, but this feels about in line with what I was expecting. The series' shtick is pretty played out at this point, so it's good that it's the last season. The 2 episodes seem to be mostly about laying the groundwork for the rest of the season, and it feels like the story's moving again after the slump of season 4. The parallels with the real world are obviously as on the nose as it gets, but it's important to remember that these episodes were written before Trump's reelection, so reality has actually superseded the show.

Not that much to say yet aside from how it still feels weird to see Frenchie and Kimiko romantically involved. Their dynamic always felt more sibling-like to me. For all its flagging pacing, this show has remained very consistent. But I don't know how good of a thing that is when it's been running these same few character beats for this long. It's hard to believe the first season came out before fucking Covid. This show should probably have been 4 seasons instead of 5 but eh, at least it doesn't seem to be going out in a flaming disaster.
 

Gordon_4

The Big Engine
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
7,409
6,563
118
Australia
Babylon 5 10/10

I'm sure in all my time here I've sung the praises of this show but since I'm rewatching it I figured I'd post about it. This is one of my comfort shows, rewatch it about once every 5 years or so. I love it so much I'm not gonna try to give some objective opinion about it, just gush.

It is my first time viewing it in two new ways for me:
- HD. Some kind of AI upscaling whatevers. It's what's on the blu-ray.
It's a mixed bag- I can tell that some fidelity is lost in the process. But seeing it so clearly is worth it and I'm enjoying it.

- JMS preferred viewing order
So "JMS" is show-runner J. Michael Straczynski. One of the things that made this show unique is that it really is that complete vision and guidance of one person, so it has more consistent, complete, and focused story-telling and chararcter development of any sci-fi show ever made (probably... maybe the Joss Whedon stuff can compare in that sense). So much so that he actually wrote most of the episodes himself.
During the making of the show he also pioneered being active on the nascent internet. He has shared, in bits and pieces, behind-the-scenes info on episodes that were delayed for production reasons, issues that effected the writing (casting, production, etc), and some of his original concepts that were scrapped or changed over the years. Vigilant fans have assembled a viewing order that deviates a bit from the aired order to create what is considered the "JMS viewing order." It includes a few standalone movies and an aborted spinoff series.
I'm watching it this way, minus the spinoffs, minus two episodes that I really dislike and add nothing to the story IMO.

Anyway, for those that no nothing about the show, the premise and setup is basically Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. And they aired together. So yes there's a whole nerd drama about who ripped off whom. At the time, B5 was looked at as the also-ran Trek. Trek was THE space game in town, not like now with so much more content and nerd culture dominating pop culture. It was on a network that went bust and of course had WAY less money to spend.

Certainly the biggest difference between B5 and DS9 is that B5 is literally not Trek, so it doesn't have the themes and lore to contend with. The biggest being that future humanity in B5 is NOT utopian. Fortunately, it's also before the post-9/11 GRIMDARK. So there is conflict, there is idealism and ideologies, there is this overriding sense that humanity can and should progress but it's brutal and painful and ugly.

The biggest most famous selling point is that the story was planned from the get-go so the twists and turns, the changes, mostly make sense by the time you get to the end. It is the most satisfying overall story in any show I've ever watched. Don't get me wrong, I love DS9, but I feel like its last season had a LOT of weaknesses and that some of its big turns towards the end were unearned.

The show's strengths AND weaknesses stem from the same place- that being its singular authorial voice. JMS has a silly sense of humor and some of the jokes fall flat; he has his boomer white guy liberal world view which is generally fine but can get the writing stuck on some annoying repetitive themes. He is a brilliant dialogue writer which leads to some spine-chilling moments but also cringe dialogue at times where it sounds like the character is reciting an essay.

The acting is all over the place, but in a way that I find charming and part of why I keep watching. Most importantly, the main cast is fantastic. Three of the main alien characters- Delenn, G'Kar, and Londo, are the kind of attention-wresting screen mongers we want in our space operas (the DS9 equivalents would be Oda and Quark). The human characters I wouldn't say were ever gonna win Emmys, but they come to take the tropes assigned to them and by the second season invest them with emotion and depth.
Walter Koenig, who played "nooklear wessels" Chekov in the original Trek is a recurring villain and his performance is a revelation. The one-off guest characters are all over the place- some of them are absurd scenery chewers and I admit I love that crap; some are great, some just suck. So it goes.

The space battles are exceptional. In terms of pure graphics, it hasn't aged well- we're talking early computer graphics. What's awesome is how they're choreagraphed and directed. They rarely are just space ships pew pewing each other- they have narrative to them. You can understand what's happening and why, what the strategies are, and there is a thought to physics and positioning that exceeds much Trek even.

Maybe the weakest production point is the alien design. A lot of bulbous head craggy faced aliens. The hair on the character of Londo is notoriously stupid looking. I'm not gonna defend it other than to say at least it's more effort than the B'joran's crinkly nose+earring (the Cardassians, on the other hand, maybe the coolest and most clever design of an important alien race).

So, I guess I'm recommending it, yet again. If anyone is looking to:
- Have a meaty show to sink their teeth into that will entertain them for a while (5 seasons, 22 episodes per)
- Doesn't mind old stuff looking of its time
- Likes some traditional story-telling: epic story, personal stories, war and peace, space shit.

A common observation/recommendation of the show is that it's slow at first and that you have to suffer through the first season before it gets good in the second. I legit think this is just wrong and I really don't think it's just me being a fanboy here. Of those initial 22 episodes, I think three are legit bad (but none are the episodes I skip), half-a-dozen are top notch, and the rest are solid. Yes, seasons 3 and 4 are the peak, and season 5 stumbles out the gate, but overall that's a pretty good hit record.

For reference, the two eps I skip are:
- Deconstruction of Falling Stars, the season 4 finale. This was basically a last-minute filler due to the behind-the-scenes production issues that also greatly hampered the first half of season 5.
- A View From the Gallery, an early season 5 that actually offends me, and not just because it adds nothing to the story or characters.
Babylon 5 is everything DS9 wishes it was and it didn't need to invent a villain sue to do the job. I'm one of the few hopeless mutants who really loved Sinclair - Jeffrey O'Hare has this amazing soft spoken warrior poet vibe to him - but I appreciate that had the story continued on the trajectory that it did, it would have been difficult to see him doing the things Sheridan did. Bruce Boxleitner has this great 'Aragorn but for TV' bearing about him that gives him the aura of a mythic hero. Its reflective of their rank and careers to if you care to dive that deeply.

I agree however that if you watch the show, the meat is coming from Londo, G'Kar and Delenn. The relationships between those three are some of the most fascinating anything you'll see in television then or now. They're all so different, in big almost impossible ways. It isn't perfect, because you tell so easily where JMS probably wrote something like 'Fuck you' and had to change it because it was commercial television in the 90s. There's also some truly weirdly structured dialogue: when Number One gets made head of IA intelligence and confronts the board of Edgars Industries on Mars is one of the lamest sounding threats I've ever heard and I cannot fathom how JMS wrote that, re-read it, and decided "Yep, that's it". Admittedly that was Season 5 which is.....wildly inconsistent. And then there's Captain Lochley who's big scene getting one over Garibaldi is not only a most cringe-worthy literal example of 'And then everyone clapped', but rings utterly fucking hollow now. Luckily they gave her The Day of the Dead episode, and suddenly she was a person and not a charactiature; it wasn't enough to save her entirely but it added dimension to the character.

But all in all, Babylon 5 is magnificent science fiction.


 

Old_Hunter_77

Elite Member
Dec 29, 2021
2,858
2,667
118
Country
United States
> I'm one of the few hopeless mutants who really loved Sinclair - Jeffrey O'Hare has this amazing soft spoken warrior poet vibe to him - but I appreciate that had the story continued on the trajectory that it did, it would have been difficult to see him doing the things Sheridan did.

Spoilers, obviously, in case anyone hasn't watched this show and wants to:

Dunno how much "behind the scenes" stuff you know about the show, but JMS basically came to the same conclusion, but I believe that's also a bit of a ret-con from him.

I think the original plan, based on things he himself has said, was that the Big Surprise Twist ending to Sinclair's story was going to be the series finale, or the penultimate episode, has O'Hare/Sinclair remained on the show. I simply refuse to believe that there was ever any intention to change the principle character. O'Hare had a slew of personal problems, including alcoholism, that led to him leaving the show. JMS claims he was already thinking of bringing another character in to lead the wars against the Shadows in the contemporary timeline (and presumably the civil war against Clark's regime) because it would have stretched believability to have Sinclair do all of that.
I think a lot of that is just JMS focusing on the what's most important- the genius of B5's structure isn't just that it was planned from the start, but it had enough contingencies to allow for the story to continue:

- the second in command from the pilot was supposed to be Control. The eventually moved to Talia.
- There was supposed to be one main telepath. That, crazily, got bounced from Lyta to Talia back to Lyta.
- Na'Toth was supposed to be a more important character- or at least G'Kar's aide, to mirror Vir and Lennier. But despite going through three (!) actresses, it kind of worked out better in the end for G'Kar to be this lone warrior-turned-priest (and the kind of "true seeker" that was explained in Grail).

Ultimately, the craziness of season 4->5 proved too much even for him. I like the actress that played #1 but her whole plot line is blech, and I just can't give a crap about Lochley for the same reason I can't give a crap about Ezri Dax- gtfo with a new main character in the last season lol. The real shame with season 5 and Lochley is what would have happened had Ivanova stayed: she, rather than Lyta, would have fallen in with Byron, largely as a reaction to her grief over Marcus. Then she'd have been forced to choose between her (false)-love for Byron + sympathy for telepaths vs her loyalty to Sheridan. She'd have chosen the latter, ending her hope for love/romance for the rest of her life, and that explains the jaded Ivanova you see in Sleeping In Light.

On this rewatch, I'm enjoying Ivanova more and can see that she was the classic Russian tragic archetype, and the worst thing about season 5 isn't Byron or A View From the Gallery, but how blue-balled we got on Ivanova.
What redeems season 5 for me is Garibaldi. His relationship to Sheridan is the most interesting relationship on the show between two humans. This complicated mix of loyalty, admiration, resentment, and of course Bester in full skeevy glory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordon_4

Gordon_4

The Big Engine
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
7,409
6,563
118
Australia
> I'm one of the few hopeless mutants who really loved Sinclair - Jeffrey O'Hare has this amazing soft spoken warrior poet vibe to him - but I appreciate that had the story continued on the trajectory that it did, it would have been difficult to see him doing the things Sheridan did.

Spoilers, obviously, in case anyone hasn't watched this show and wants to:

Dunno how much "behind the scenes" stuff you know about the show, but JMS basically came to the same conclusion, but I believe that's also a bit of a ret-con from him.

I think the original plan, based on things he himself has said, was that the Big Surprise Twist ending to Sinclair's story was going to be the series finale, or the penultimate episode, has O'Hare/Sinclair remained on the show. I simply refuse to believe that there was ever any intention to change the principle character. O'Hare had a slew of personal problems, including alcoholism, that led to him leaving the show. JMS claims he was already thinking of bringing another character in to lead the wars against the Shadows in the contemporary timeline (and presumably the civil war against Clark's regime) because it would have stretched believability to have Sinclair do all of that.
I think a lot of that is just JMS focusing on the what's most important- the genius of B5's structure isn't just that it was planned from the start, but it had enough contingencies to allow for the story to continue:

- the second in command from the pilot was supposed to be Control. The eventually moved to Talia.
- There was supposed to be one main telepath. That, crazily, got bounced from Lyta to Talia back to Lyta.
- Na'Toth was supposed to be a more important character- or at least G'Kar's aide, to mirror Vir and Lennier. But despite going through three (!) actresses, it kind of worked out better in the end for G'Kar to be this lone warrior-turned-priest (and the kind of "true seeker" that was explained in Grail).

Ultimately, the craziness of season 4->5 proved too much even for him. I like the actress that played #1 but her whole plot line is blech, and I just can't give a crap about Lochley for the same reason I can't give a crap about Ezri Dax- gtfo with a new main character in the last season lol. The real shame with season 5 and Lochley is what would have happened had Ivanova stayed: she, rather than Lyta, would have fallen in with Byron, largely as a reaction to her grief over Marcus. Then she'd have been forced to choose between her (false)-love for Byron + sympathy for telepaths vs her loyalty to Sheridan. She'd have chosen the latter, ending her hope for love/romance for the rest of her life, and that explains the jaded Ivanova you see in Sleeping In Light.

On this rewatch, I'm enjoying Ivanova more and can see that she was the classic Russian tragic archetype, and the worst thing about season 5 isn't Byron or A View From the Gallery, but how blue-balled we got on Ivanova.
What redeems season 5 for me is Garibaldi. His relationship to Sheridan is the most interesting relationship on the show between two humans. This complicated mix of loyalty, admiration, resentment, and of course Bester in full skeevy glory.
I don’t think Ivanova, even in her grief, would fall for Byron’s bullshit. It works on Lyta because she was at one point someone with power and influence and then everything happened, and she was suddenly left with nothing.

Sheridan and the IA left her out in the cold and did nothing to help her even after everything she did to help them battle the Shadows. Lyta had to go back to Psi-Corps to be able to work and afford her quarters on B5. The only person on that station (once you know who was gone) whose relationship with her was not wholly transactional was Zack. And Lyta - so far as I know - never felt anything for him.

Conversely, Ivanova still had people around her who cared for her; Sheridan, Delenn, Garibaldi, Dr. Franklin. Hell, even Londo and G’Kar would probably sit down with her help her drown her sorrows. Her support structure was too strong and too attuned to her to allow her to fall for him. And as much as Ivanova has a vested interest in seeing the Psi-Corps burn to the ground, she’d not see their cause as righteous compared to the Shadow War.


Yes I’m very well aware of Michael O’Hare and the issues he suffered; especially the schizophrenia that plagued him - which I suspect was a contributing factor to his alcoholism. And that knowledge makes some of the more manic moments the character has a little uncomfortable to watch now: as if I’ve accidentally seen someone in a moment of private weakness in the middle of an office.
 
Last edited:

Old_Hunter_77

Elite Member
Dec 29, 2021
2,858
2,667
118
Country
United States
> I don’t think Ivanova, even in her grief, would fall for Byron’s bullshit. It works on Lyta because she was at one point someone with power and influence and then everything happened, and she was suddenly left with nothing.

Sure but then other could have happened- I mean that's the whole point of missing out on what could have been. If Byron et al had come on during season 4 as planned, would have had more time to develop that story and include events that would make Ivanova feel more isolated. I also wonder if the rush to make that arc shorter resulted in making Byron a bit more space-Jesusy than he could have been, and consequently more easy to hate. I mean, who knows, right? Yeah, Ivanova had support from people like Sheridan, but remember how Garibaldi was pushed into conflict with Sheridan, too. Lots of stuff could have happened in the details.

Anyway, enough B5 spoilers, other stuff:

Shrinking season 4; 6/10

Another season wrapped up of the comedy that warps you between HAHAHA and BOO-HOO minute to minute.
I kind of love hate this show. It's about therapists therapizing at each other. Some of the jokes are funny and some of the heartfelt moments work but I think if it weren't cast with some of my favorite performers (Jason Segal, Jessica Williams, Harrison Ford), I'd have quit. I mean Segal's character is just insufferably annoying. Even worse is the lady neighbor whose whole schtick is that she butts in everywhere and is domineering and annoying but it's supposed to be cute? They lampshade it by calling attention to it but it's still horrible.
This season had a tragic story arc in it that started addressing the issue of societal loneliness, it was the most interesting part of the show, and then it just ended with a thud.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,577
2,078
118
Country
USA
The Boys Season 5 E1 and 2

Surprisingly good so far, even if ham fisted wearing its politics on its sleeve. There's still something there for those that want a good supers gone bad married to international ruthless corporations kind of show. The writing is far superior to the start of Season 4, which isn't saying much as that was so bad. And for once, it appears to be taking things in a direction that goes beyond the books.

I will write,
I regret they appear to have brought soldier boy for just this one episode, only to kill him with the virus. But they are actually using the virus! EDIT: I am getting hints that Soldier Boy, as a major plot point, may not be dead
B+ for real, but as it is my jam, A-.
 

Old_Hunter_77

Elite Member
Dec 29, 2021
2,858
2,667
118
Country
United States
I too have a love-hate relationship with this show. Haven't caught up with it yet (I thought season 3 was the new one). How's Michael J. Fox in it?
Fox appears in a couple of scenes in a couple of episodes. It's great. I do recommend subtitles because it can be hard to understand what he's saying sometimes, for obvious reasons through no fault of his own. He's mostly there to kick around with Harrison Ford for a couple of minutes and you'd have to be heartless to not be taken by that.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
20,139
4,507
118

The first (and since it never went further, also the only) ep of The Incredible Robert Baldick. Written by Terry Nation, the Doctor Who influences really show, and it also wants to be a watered down Nigel Kneale. Though, odd place of being too scary for kids,but not scary enough to be dedicated horror, and a bit shaky being the pilot. Still worth watching, IMHO.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,067
4,775
118
Finished DTF St. Louis. The finale played out more or less as expected and cemented it as a great journey-over-destination show. If you're in it for the detective story you're bound for disappointment. If you get a kick out of emotionally stunted adults awkwardly maneuvering around feelings they can't quite share or comprehend, rock on. I guess it's also about that old chestnut, "male loneliness", a concept which I only ever see brought up as a joke. Is male loneliness tantamount to being emotionally illiterate? Do you think that "people are weird", and do you consider the thought terribly original? Anyway, let the sunshine in and all that. So far it's my favorite this year.
 

Old_Hunter_77

Elite Member
Dec 29, 2021
2,858
2,667
118
Country
United States
Finished DTF St. Louis. The finale played out more or less as expected and cemented it as a great journey-over-destination show. If you're in it for the detective story you're bound for disappointment. If you get a kick out of emotionally stunted adults awkwardly maneuvering around feelings they can't quite share or comprehend, rock on. I guess it's also about that old chestnut, "male loneliness", a concept which I only ever see brought up as a joke. Is male loneliness tantamount to being emotionally illiterate? Do you think that "people are weird", and do you consider the thought terribly original? Anyway, let the sunshine in and all that. So far it's my favorite this year.
Glad you enjoyed it.

I admit I watched the trailer and bailed hard. Something about it rubbed me the wrong way.
I know it is shallow to dismiss something because of a trailer, but I honestly don't remember the last time my viewing experience of the actual thing conflicted with my reaction to a trailer. Same for my wife.

Maybe I'm a prude. I reacted negatively to earlier critically acclaimed sex-themed series like Californication and Hung, as well.
 

Old_Hunter_77

Elite Member
Dec 29, 2021
2,858
2,667
118
Country
United States
The Boys Season 5 E1 and 2

Surprisingly good so far, even if ham fisted wearing its politics on its sleeve. There's still something there for those that want a good supers gone bad married to international ruthless corporations kind of show. The writing is far superior to the start of Season 4, which isn't saying much as that was so bad. And for once, it appears to be taking things in a direction that goes beyond the books.

I will write,
I regret they appear to have brought soldier boy for just this one episode, only to kill him with the virus. But they are actually using the virus! EDIT: I am getting hints that Soldier Boy, as a major plot point, may not be dead
B+ for real, but as it is my jam, A-.
Trump is posting memes of himself as literal Jesus while started mideast wars. There is no such thing as "ham fisted wearing its politics on its sleeve" any more.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,067
4,775
118
Glad you enjoyed it.

I admit I watched the trailer and bailed hard. Something about it rubbed me the wrong way.
I know it is shallow to dismiss something because of a trailer, but I honestly don't remember the last time my viewing experience of the actual thing conflicted with my reaction to a trailer. Same for my wife.

Maybe I'm a prude. I reacted negatively to earlier critically acclaimed sex-themed series like Californication and Hung, as well.
I can't vouch for exactly just how titillating the whole ménage à cuck thing is supposed to be in the show, since I'm not into that shit anymore than I'm into feet or Sonic the Hedgehog. But my impression was that whatever fetish the showrunner may or may not have, here it worked fine as a gateway for all the pent up sadness and loneliness plaguing these peoples' lives, and that it was mostly played for laughs anyway, given how ineptly they navigate the whole thing.

You know that layer of homoeroticism that's baked into Superbad and every other I love you bro comedy from the 00s? It's a bit like that but taken to an extreme. Less cute, more pathetic here.

Me and my girl also write smut for sport (she's got some reputable cache in AO3, I just do it to offend people) so we're both pretty inoculated to sex as taboo.
 
Last edited: