So what your trying to say is:ultimatechance said:*snip*
Your reviews are average at best, but you get a lot of replies because you like to reply to comments in your thread?
So what your trying to say is:ultimatechance said:*snip*
I've been here for about half a year now, and I think I've read a good majority of your reviews. Within that time, I have always seen your reviews at the top of the user reviews page (whenever you made new reviews). When your review is constantly at the top for everyone to see, you cant help but get a good amount of attention. You also know as well as I do that you are very much into bumping threads. Making 2-4 bumps per review (excluding replies), waiting to reply to posts (then posting on ones before it to disguise another bump), as well as editing out a "final bump" so that you can make another bump. That's quite a lot of bumpin' if you ask me.D_987 said:So what your trying to say is:ultimatechance said:*snip*
Your reviews are average more or less, but one of the main reasons for why you get a lot of replies is because you know how to bump.
If you don't like them - don't read them, - doesn't bother me; I don't know why you constantly reply to them if this is how you feel...ultimatechance said:Your reviews are average more or less
See the point above.I've read a good majority of your reviews.
Really? I don't believe that for a second, look at the massive paragraph you just wrote all about it...I could care less about who gets more attention than the other
So when I try and have a decent conversation with you, you go and take things too personally and start crying about it.D_987 said:If you don't like them - don't read them, - doesn't bother me; I don't know why you constantly reply to them if this is how you feel...ultimatechance said:Your reviews are average more or less
See the point above.I've read a good majority of your reviews.
Really? I don't believe that for a second, look at the massive paragraph you just wrote all about it...I could care less about who gets more attention than the other
Exactly my point - the word average in itself is open to interpretation - what you may considor average I may not; I believe your reviews to be above average - therefore I have lower standards than yourself - its subjective.ultimatechance said:1. Do you not get what average means? I think I'm average
So let me clarify a few things then.D_987 said:Exactly my point - the word average in itself is open to interpretation - what you may considor average I may not; I believe your reviews to be above average - therefore I have lower standards than yourself - its subjective.ultimatechance said:1. Do you not get what average means? I think I'm average
Besides which, how can text be seen as "crying" - I've never understood that comment...so because I dispute your comments I'm seen to be crying?
My definition is completely different, which might explain the confusion.ultimatechance said:So let me clarify a few things then.
Average = good, but flawed in my eyes. I think that we are on par with each other based on what I've read, but I obviously still had some criticism to give.
You have your answer in bold - people read text differently within their own heads. If you meant no offence then fine, but that wasn't the impression I gained originally.And when I say "crying", I am talking about your offended reaction to my post that had the potential to be something offensive, but really wasn't at all. Nothing I said in this thread was meant to piss you off (excluding last post), or even remotely offend you, I was just being honest in the nicest way I could, and it kinda irritated me when you somehow managed to escalate it to the point that we are at now.
Eh, it really is fine with me.pigeon_of_doom said:Ultimatechance, just leave it. You're simply falling prey to his bumping masterplan (as am I).
Why does everyone appear to think this...?pigeon_of_doom said:but the obvious amount of effort you put into the review
Sure they are; they write music that appeals to a wide group of people rather than a niche following (like metal) therefore they can be classed as pop.BlackJack47 said:I will say that the Goo Goo Dolls are NOT a pop-band![]()
They are quite lengthy, which just lead me to assume that more effort went into them than many other reviews on the site. Well done if you can write reviews like this in half an hour or so without very much effort.D_987 said:Why does everyone appear to think this...?
Nice work ^_^D_987 said:snip
But... that's...what... you're meant to do...Right?D_987 said:So what your trying to say is:ultimatechance said:*snip*
Your reviews are average at best, but you get a lot of replies because you like to reply to comments in your thread?
Well I probably do over-do it a bit, but meh I'm not going to change my ways anytime soon. Your certainly not doing anything wrong though.danosaurus said:But... that's...what... you're meant to do...Right?
Or have I been in the wrong every time i reply to people commenting on my reviews?