DMR : The Shawshank Redemption

Recommended Videos

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
This is my 3rd Movie review; please keep all criticisms constructive no excessive nit-picking please

The Shawshank Redemption is a Drama released in February 1995. It runs for 142 minutes.


The Shawshank Redemption is a film written by Frank Darabont (3 time Oscar nominee) after reading a short story by the writer Stephen King; ?Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption?.

The film centres on Andy Dufrense, who is sent to prison for a double life sentence after his wife and the man she was cheating on him with, were found shot dead. Dufrense, who claims he is innocent, is sent to Shawshank prison. There he meets the inmate ?Red?, and the pair form a strong friendship; despite the tough conditions they face at Shawshank. Andy?s tale may be slightly far-fetched, but the film is immersive enough and portrays these events in such a realistic way you don?t really notice. Inside Dufrense meets an array of inmates, from the hilarious Heywood, to the oldest inmate in the prison Brooks. Who?s short, but memorable appearance encompasses the messages this film gives to its audience.

?Hope?, and the way people trap themselves in their daily lives. Now you may be thinking, ?what?s he talking about, it?s a prison movie?, and that?s exactly how the film draws the viewer in. It is only after watching the film can a viewer truly understand the experience this film gives you.

On IMDB.com (a film fact site) The Shawshank Redemption is the number one rated film ever created (at the time of writing) .
Source: http://www.imdb.com/chart/top?tt0111161

That list includes some of the most renowned films ever created ? The Godfather, Star Wars, The Matrix, Citizen Kane, even recent thrillers such as The Dark Knight. All fall to the sheer popularity of this film. There has to be something more to this film than a simple prison story; for on the DVD I watched this film on (found in a bargain bin may I note) I saw members of a Christian group discussing this film and its reference to modern society; I will take an example from the trailer, as not to spoil the film. In one of the final shots of the trailer we see Andy standing half-naked with rain pouring around him, his arms out-stretched. This is meant to be a religious reference to new-life, and death.

But enough about seeing things that might not be there; you don?t care about the deeper meanings of a film you have not seen, you want me to explain what its about and my opinions on it? Well I?m not going to go into more detail (with regards to the story) because that could potentially spoil the whole film for you. That is how highly I rate this film. One of the things that make this film so appealing is the acting; now anyone who has read my previous reviews will know I haven?t been particularly critical when it comes to acting. (A fact I learnt with my Batman Begins review) but the quality of performance in this film cannot be criticised. The acting, and emotion displayed by all the characters (even the extras) is of the highest order.

Tim Robbins does an outstanding job as Andy Dufrense, at first he appears still and uneasy, but as a Morgan Freeman overview points out ? he is supposed to appear like that; he?s just been given a double life-sentence! Robbins does an excellent job of making the audience care about his character; particularly important in a film such as this one. As just mentioned, Morgan Freeman plays ?Red? ? ?the man who has been known to locate certain things?. He gives a truly amazing performance, from laughing at a joke told by Heywood, to feeling depressed as he realises a harsh reality about prison life. Morgan does a particularly grand job of getting emotions from viewers.

As mentioned, all extras do a fantastic job of bringing each character a unique personality, slipping in a back-story to even the least important characters. Other noteworthy performances include that of William Saddler (Heywood), Gil Bellows (Tommy, a man who knows the truth behind Andy?s past) and Bob Grunton (Warden Norton) ? who?s performance excels that even of Robbins; Grunton?s character, a corrupt Warden who hides behind religion, is executed perfectly. The Shawshank Redemption was filmed in Mansfield, Ohio, and the prison used is Ohio state reformatory ? a large Gothic building. The set is superb ? setting the tone well. The music is also well done; composed by Thomas Newman and was nominated for an Oscar. He has produced great music for recent blockbusters such as Wall-E and Revelation Road. You may think I?m heaping too much praise on this film, after all the premise sounds corny, over-done, clichéd. Yet it has a unique charm about it that has made so many people watch it. The message of hope and inspiration is one many people can enjoy and take away.

Despite not winning a single Oscar (although being nominated for 7 certainly heightened the films popularity) and being received terribly by critics at the time (a film portraying Hope?) this film has emerged to become one of the all time greats.

A must watch.
 

Ronwue

New member
Oct 22, 2008
607
0
0
One of the most awesome films I have ever seen and will watch over and over and over again. It will never get boring.

"The funny thing is, on the outside, I was an honest man, straight as an arrow. I had to come to prison to be a crook." - best line ever.
 

Avida

New member
Oct 17, 2008
1,029
0
0
Throughout reading that i was hoping and praying it would be a positive review, so in short Woo!

Shawshank is possibly my favorite film, possibly not, but its up there in the top spots, ive yet to actually make a list.

Anyway, nice review, keep up the good work.
 

Novajam

New member
Apr 26, 2008
965
0
0
I still don't like the way you introduce the review. It's still blocky, like a car that turns on, goes about 2 feet, stops, sputters and then starts again.

Instead of:

D_987 said:
The Shawshank Redemption is a Drama released in February 1995. It runs for 142 minutes.

-youtube clip snip-

The Shawshank Redemption is a film written by Frank Darabont (3 time Oscar nominee) after reading a short story by the writer Stephen King; "Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption".

The film centres on Andy Dufrense...
I suggest:


The Shawshank Redemption is the Oscar nominated 1995 drama film based of the short story "Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption" by Stephen King. The film centres on Andy Dufrense...and the rest of the plot synopsis goes here

Leave the runtime out altogether I saw, unless the film you're reviewing is either very long or very short, or doesn't pace itself well over the course of the film.

Other than that, read it back to yourself (out loud if need be) to check for redundancies and see where things could be smoothed over. If it doesn't read well to you, it'll read worse to us.

Nice job, but a little pale compared to your other film reviews. (There Will Be Blood, in particular)
 

RufusMcLaser

New member
Mar 27, 2008
713
0
0
I've loved this movie from the moment I saw it (on the big screen) many years ago. It's still in my top five. I also see I'm not the only one to feel that way.
 

Anarchemitis

New member
Dec 23, 2007
9,100
0
0
Holy Crap what a coincidence, I just watched it yesterday and was contemplating writing a similar review.

I considered it better than Citizen Kane.
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
Agreed on all points. I do believe Shawshank is possibly one of the best films of all time. Superb acting, setting, and story, not to mention camera work and costumes (for the handful of times we see outside of the prison).

D_987 said:
Despite not winning a single Oscar (although being nominated for 7 certainly heightened the films popularity) and being received terribly by critics at the time (a film portraying Hope?) this film has emerged to become one of the all time greats.
Wait, what? How did they not like it?!

As for your review itself, about the only thing I think you needed to work on was providing more details about that ;) as I really didn't know the critics panned it.
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
Doug said:
Agreed on all points. I do believe Shawshank is possibly one of the best films of all time. Superb acting, setting, and story, not to mention camera work and costumes (for the handful of times we see outside of the prison).

D_987 said:
Despite not winning a single Oscar (although being nominated for 7 certainly heightened the films popularity) and being received terribly by critics at the time (a film portraying Hope?) this film has emerged to become one of the all time greats.
Wait, what? How did they not like it?!

As for your review itself, about the only thing I think you needed to work on was providing more details about that ;) as I really didn't know the critics panned it.
They claimed it was cliched.
 

brabz

New member
Jan 3, 2008
358
0
0
Doug said:
Agreed on all points. I do believe Shawshank is possibly one of the best films of all time. Superb acting, setting, and story, not to mention camera work and costumes (for the handful of times we see outside of the prison).

D_987 said:
Despite not winning a single Oscar (although being nominated for 7 certainly heightened the films popularity) and being received terribly by critics at the time (a film portraying Hope?) this film has emerged to become one of the all time greats.
Wait, what? How did they not like it?!

As for your review itself, about the only thing I think you needed to work on was providing more details about that ;) as I really didn't know the critics panned it.
I recall the reviews and hype being roundly positive. It just had the misfortune of being up against "Forrest Gump" in '95.
 

curlycrouton

New member
Jul 13, 2008
2,456
0
0
brabz said:
Doug said:
Agreed on all points. I do believe Shawshank is possibly one of the best films of all time. Superb acting, setting, and story, not to mention camera work and costumes (for the handful of times we see outside of the prison).

D_987 said:
Despite not winning a single Oscar (although being nominated for 7 certainly heightened the films popularity) and being received terribly by critics at the time (a film portraying Hope…) this film has emerged to become one of the all time greats.
Wait, what? How did they not like it?!

As for your review itself, about the only thing I think you needed to work on was providing more details about that ;) as I really didn't know the critics panned it.
I recall the reviews and hype being roundly positive. It just had the misfortune of being up against "Forrest Gump" in '95.
1995 was a great year for cinema. Hey, maybe you should do a review of that?
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
curlycrouton said:
1995 was a great year for cinema. Hey, maybe you should do a review of that?
1995 or Forrest Gump?

I have seen Forrest gump - a very long time ago; I'll see if its on TV anytime soon (it's usually on Sky movies).