Do people have souls???

Recommended Videos

AceAngel

New member
May 12, 2010
775
0
0
neoontime said:
AceAngel said:
The question should be 'What is a soul?"....
NO, no it shouldn't!
Aww, c'mon, abit of philosophical searching on a 'thing' which was never explained in the first place it a great way to get an A+ on your paper...and if the teacher is a Nerd, you can always say, both the cake and the soul are a lie...
 

PurplePlatypus

Duel shield wielder
Jul 8, 2010
592
0
0
No I don?t believe in a soul.
I?m not even sure what people think a soul is, as far as I?m aware their isn?t a solid definition. Any characteristics people try to contribute the soul have shown to be function of the brain and are affected as the brain is affected. For instance people, having suffered brain damage, have come out the other side totally different; including things like personality and even how they think and process information.

So when people say the soul move on to something else after death I do kind of wonder what that means. It certainly isn?t our memory or anything that might be recognisable as us.
 

infested

New member
Sep 18, 2009
134
0
0
I believe it may be possible our consciousness is carried on a specific frequency like a radio (as an example), I don't have the foggiest if this is correct or not but its something to think about.
 

blackflare

New member
Jul 25, 2010
172
0
0
I dont really know exactly how define soul but the way i see it if you have the abiity the reason to think consiously to know that you exist then yes you have something although if you have some mental ilness then it must be defined differently but i believe everything on and in this world has a soul because you have to believe something i just dont want to think bout my body rotting in a cofin when i die.
 

Baldry

New member
Feb 11, 2009
2,412
0
0
Yeah I think there is a soul. But how I would define it...I can't. But I couldn't live my life if I didn't know we all have a soul.
 

The_ModeRazor

New member
Jul 29, 2009
2,835
0
0
Absolutely no way to tell. Me, I go with cessation of existence when it comes to death, but I have no answer to your question.
I'm mostly with science, but there's a lot we don't know. Yet. (I hope)
 

Ultra_Caboose

New member
Aug 25, 2008
542
0
0
I'm kind of conflicted. I highly doubt that we have souls, and yet I think we do.

Not to be depressing, but my grandfather passed away last month. After being in the hospital and comatose for nearly three weeks with no real hope of recovery, my grandmother decided to take him off life support. I was there for his final moments, and after he passed, it felt like the room had become empty. It might've just been my emotions getting to me, but I couldn't feel his presence anymore. I sat there for about half an hour and the more I stared at his body the more it felt as though I wasn't really looking at anybody I knew. The grandfather I had known was gone, and all that remained was his cast-away shell.

Like I said, that very well could've been me just being emotional during the moment. I am an atheist, but it's hard to say that I didn't feel something leave him in those moments. So while I really don't believe in them, I would like to think that I'm wrong.
 

nuba km

New member
Jun 7, 2010
5,050
0
0
no and don't follow your heart because it just pumps blood through your body follow your mind. does that mean that our decision should be cold logic HELL no every emotion you feel is the same as before the fact is the stupid things people do is due to their brain any chose you have taken due to emotions is due to your brain when you cry due to lose that is due to your brain. your brain isn't cold logic it is everything you are complex, every emotion you will ever feel or have field, every memory you have and understanding it will find out the point of live not searching for some imaginary soul.
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
I'm an atheist and I'm in no way spiritual so no, I don't believe there is a soul. I've got nothing against people who do believe that as long as they don't push their belief onto others.
 

Racecar1994

New member
Nov 21, 2009
107
0
0
Dags90 said:
Racecar1994 said:
Of course, this can be hard to believe, and even the theory itself has flaws, but it is the best a priori argument for our existence outside of our bodies and minds (bodies and parts of it are still fallible)and thus the existence of a soul is best explained by this statement.
It's not an argument for our existence outside of our bodies and minds, just that our minds are not driven by physical events. It's a really flawed argument that can't answer important problems like how the supernatural aspects interact and affect the natural aspects/why physical altercation of the brain affects nonphysical mental states, and how non physical minds became associated with physical genetic lineages and at which point that occurred (or occurs). Do we get souls during conception? Birth?

Personally, I'm a non-dualist.
Hmm...surely if it's not driven by physical events, then then it IS an argument for our existence outside our bodies (given the language, however, it does not actually relate independance from the mind... in fact Descartes was even stated to have located the soul in...[stay on target])

I did state there were flaws with it, but nonetheless the fact that it is an a priori statement makes it really hard to ignore. I would like to hear some of these flaws you mentioned (or hinted at) fleshed out in more detail however.

Supernatural apects affecting natural aspects sounds interesting enough, but I believe that is more of a generalisation that (to some extent) includes the argument I mentioned (if you regard supernatural as something outside of our 'world') and the idea of non-physical activities affecting physical ones is just a development of theories founded on the idea of a soul, and of course that relates to Descartes' argument.

In conclusion, It seems to me that Descartes' argument IS indeed relevant to this topic (which is why I posted it in the first place), but I will admit that I took it fairly out of context when I said that the 'thinking thing' in the simplest form being the soul, although I believe that's how Descartes would have put it anyway, considering he is a theist.
 

thespis721

New member
Oct 18, 2010
41
0
0
Kind of reminds me of when I was reading about Albert Einstein. Apologies if this is in the thread but 100+ posting threads tend to cause my eyes to blur. He said that he believed that there were souls, but in a different context then religion. He said that energy cannot be created nor destroyed and therefore the energy in our bodies that starts us up is the soul and that when we die, that energy goes out into the universe, whether it be into plants or animals or whatever.

Not the most eloquent way for me to put out the point, but I'm sure you all get it.
 

Piction Froject

New member
Nov 11, 2010
122
0
0
No they dont they are hollow husks that are controlled by the radiation of the universe which then is isolated with in the husk and then molded to form an intelligent life form all very simple really.
 

MoeTheMonk

New member
Apr 26, 2010
136
0
0
You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body.
C. S. Lewis

I believe we all have souls, that's part of what makes humans unique.

And some things will never be proven by science. Having a soul is one of those things. I think it's pretty useless to even bring science up in these sorts of questions, because it's just an easy way out. "Well, we've never actually seen any souls, so... I guess they don't exist!" or "Well, you can't prove God exists, so... I guess he's out the picture too."
 

EldritchCarrot

New member
Nov 10, 2010
8
0
0
Really depends on how your defining soul, but I would say no as the burden of proof for some sorta "me-ness" that departs on death has not been met.
 

Kris015

Some kind of Monster
Feb 21, 2009
1,808
0
0
AceAngel said:
The question should be 'What is a soul?"....
Indeed.

I heard somewhere, or actually several places, that we lose 21 grams when we die. Dunno if it's true, but i could be the souls.
 
Jul 13, 2010
504
0
0
I would like to think so, but I'm not sure either way. For me it is connected to the issue of whether we can genuinely feel emotion for others, or whether we simply feel for them based on their influence on us, i.e. when a friend dies you feel sad because you will not be able to enjoy their friendship in the future rather then you fill sad for them directly. After a lot of thought and reasoning which, for the sake of not derailing the thread I won't put down here, I came to the conclusion that you are not emotionally limited to how things effect you, but can genuinely feel for others. It is mainly this conclusion that leads me to still harbour a belief that there may be some sort of other factor, such as a soul, in humanity. Also, I am an atheist, if it matters.
 

ArcWinter

New member
May 9, 2009
1,013
0
0
Nope.

It's that simple.

Did you know that personality doesn't actually exist? It is just a combination of memories and qenetic tendencies. True story!

althouqh that could be what personality is defined as you know what ill qive it the benefit of the doubt and just chanqe the definition of personality there we qo all set
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,087
0
0
The soul is a human made phenomenon based on nothing, but the belief that we're something mroe than animals.
We can feel love that makes us superior, we can feel joy, that makes us superior, we are humans therefor we have souls.

It's all a big load of bullshit if you ask me though. We believe in soul because of religion. Religion is created to explain things they lacked technology and knowledge to explain. The soul was created to understand why we weren't animals. The truth is that we are animals. We live based on instincts, but we've evolved more complex minds than any other species on Earth as far as we know. That's why we don't want to admit it. When we fall in love that's our instincts for reproduction kicking in. That makes the brain give us chemical signals on how we should feel.
The magic is dead for me, but I am glad some here can still believe in it. I hope that the cold dark world wont be enough to crush the minds of those who believe.


Irony said:
Edit: Oh and OP its "philosophy" and "philosophical". Don't mean to be a dick and I understand its an easy mistake to make, but I just wanted to let you know as your misspellings kinda bugged me.
He did apologize for the bad English up front.
 

Caliostro

Headhunter
Jan 23, 2008
3,253
0
0
Off course not. The very concept is ridiculous.

People don't honestly believe it either. It's like religions, people just fool themselves into pretending they believe it, because it's far more comfortable than the truth.