I ask this question mostly for one recent game that it's hated by so many people and reviewers: Beyond: Two Souls.
Let's face it, the game is awful. But there's so many people defending this game by using just one argument: "It tried something different". Does that mean it doesn't sucks? No.
I've seen alot of reviewers and users making tons of valid points about why the game is mediocre on it's genre and criticizing its poor narrative.
Yea, it is different, so what?
Oh of course, they also point out that the game has an "amazing and compelling story" but they don't even explain why, why it is so "Awesome and deep".
Same happens with so many games, i think the best examples are Final Fantasy XIII and Banjo Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts. "You just hate it because is different". No matter how valid criticism those games get, they always use the same argument.
Can't they understand that being "different" and "good" is not the same thing?
Now im wondering, someone has used this argument against you?
P.S: Sorry, my english is not good really
Let's face it, the game is awful. But there's so many people defending this game by using just one argument: "It tried something different". Does that mean it doesn't sucks? No.
I've seen alot of reviewers and users making tons of valid points about why the game is mediocre on it's genre and criticizing its poor narrative.
Yea, it is different, so what?
Oh of course, they also point out that the game has an "amazing and compelling story" but they don't even explain why, why it is so "Awesome and deep".
Same happens with so many games, i think the best examples are Final Fantasy XIII and Banjo Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts. "You just hate it because is different". No matter how valid criticism those games get, they always use the same argument.
Can't they understand that being "different" and "good" is not the same thing?
Now im wondering, someone has used this argument against you?
P.S: Sorry, my english is not good really