do we need so many cores?

Recommended Videos

LuisEz

New member
Jan 28, 2009
42
0
0
i heard about multitasking since 3.11, i was little but i remember my uncle talking about how lame was the hardware at the time and how was holding back the progress of the sotware...

Well... i tought that with Intel's HyperThreading and Amd's Hypertransport (tomaito tomato...) thats was it, we finally achived the multitasking... but just when i was getting use to have a fast bus the multicores came out. X2, Pentium D (wich by the way was a total failure), came with trumphets, they were the pimp of processors, at that time we were saying "hasta la vista" to Via C's Processors. Well, we had 2 cores, i thought well... this really had to be the final, we have multitasking now... i was sOoOoOoOoOoo wrong, cuz 4 cores came... and i have to say... i was dessapointed, cuz we didnt have sotware that uses well the 2 cores and now we have 4? i thought was a waste... but well... we had it. Then came the improvement of those cores, Core 2, Phenom, now I7 and Phenom II... is nice to have so many processor to chose... but is it worth the effort?

The are few uses 4 cores propertly and now, maybe, in the 3Q of this year 8 cores arrive?... so, now instead of have 2 cores 98% of the time off we'll have 6 cores 98% of the time off...

Now, we got to the time when sotfware if holding back hardware, and not only talking about porcessors also its holding back graphic cards. Bad Drivers, incompatibility issues, even the drivers of the multicore grapich cards are unable to use the hardware properly.

Its like in school there's this guy that is atletic and runs the 100mts in 10 seconds and there is the fat kid always at the end, but the fat kid goes to fat camp and trains all the summer and get fit and say "now this year im gonna win" only to realize that now the atletic kid now has bionic legs and has nitro in his ass... thats what hardware is making to software, sotware needed some time to be multicore (and for multicore i mean 2 core) and says "hey hardware, give me your 2 cores processors im ready" and hardware says "ohh thats good... but we have 4 cores now..."

The reason Athlon Xp was a huge success was Amd join with Microsoft for making the processor, sotware and hardware working together... now that seems to be lost.

SLI? Crossfire? and now QUAD-Crossfire, Triple SLI... why? only to get 9 maybe 10 more fps? cuz drives cant deliver a good funtionality of the harware? Did u hear me alienware? its not worthing.

What hadware companies have to do is working together with the software industry to make hardware that is actually fully funtional.

ps. again, sorry for my bad english
 

Abedeus

New member
Sep 14, 2008
7,412
0
0
You do know it's REALLY, REEAAAAALLY, like REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLYYYYY hard to understand your post? I mean, I know you are ranting about multi-cored CPUs (wut) or the OPTIONAL SLI/Crossfire, but JESUS ZOMBIE CHRIST DUDE. Use Word or some kind of Firefox spell check, it will be easier to read that stuff.

Athlong? Hypertrading? Not to mention terrible grammar... "Does it worth the effort?" killed my brains.

Also, your analogy with running is completely biased. And your whole post is, too. It's not hardware's fault companies can't optimize their software or get it to use multi-cored CPUs.

Do you actually know, why more cores is usually good?
 

Podunk

New member
Dec 18, 2008
822
0
0
I thought this was a topic about Armored Core, so I rushed over.

It is not. And I have no idea what you are talking about.

But I think the answer is also no.
 

Spacelord

New member
May 7, 2008
1,811
0
0
Well, as a dated computer user, I'm quite attracted to the idea of having a better processor speed - right now there's this indie game I can't even run properly. I'm doomed to play Starcraft and Diablo II, my laptop can't handle anything heavier (not that THAT's such a terrible thing...)

Personally I'd think a quad core is overdoing it though - I mean, the only game I'm really looking forward to is Diablo III (I'm a Blizzard fanboy, can you tell?), and we all know the spec requirements for that game are going to be pretty reasonable.

However, I can see how people want bigger and badder - compare it to those really fast sports cars! You know the speed limit is 65 anywhere, tops, and driving much faster outside of a sanctioned racing circuit is pure suicide, but: the mere ability is satisfying enough. That, or just revving the engine. ;) So I guess it's kinda like that.

Steelfists said:
Abedeus said:
Do you actually know, why more cores is usually good?
so we am has more mans on screen
Also I thought this was funny. :D
 

AndresCL

New member
Feb 2, 2009
84
0
0
Hum? Havent you think that servers take way more advantage of multicore than home users at the moment, but everything evolves at its time