Doctor Who's Matt Smith Departing Show At Christmas

Recommended Videos

luvd1

New member
Jan 25, 2010
736
0
0
thaluikhain said:
Ronack said:
Okay, Moffat, now is the time to move away from fairy tale whimsy and move back to a more grounded approach. Do something different with the next Doctor. Whether it's an older Doctor (new for NewWho) or a black Doctor or even a female Doctor. This is the time, Moffat! Don't faff it up!
Argh, yes.

luvd1 said:
Awww. The Corsair. Even though s/he was only mentioned and partly shown. I would love an episode that had him/her in. They're time travellers, coz they're dead shouldn't mean they can't.
Nah...that'd muck up the whole "Time Lords are all dead" thing. Sure, it makes sense, but mumble mumble mumble.
.... But I want to see Brian blessed in doctor who. we all know he is the corsair, it doesn't make sense other wise. I do not want to be in a world that won't have Brian Blessed as the corsair.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
20,140
4,508
118
luvd1 said:
.... But I want to see Brian blessed in doctor who. we all know he is the corsair, it doesn't make sense other wise. I do not want to be in a world that won't have Brian Blessed as the corsair.
When it was announced that he'd be in Dr Who, there was talk of him being the Dr. Of course, he ended up as Yrcanos instead.

Dunno if he'd really work.

I still think we'll get some pretty boy for the Twilight fans.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,506
3
43
Katherine Kerensky said:
...So, when and where can I brainwash the BBC to hire Benedict Cumberbatch?
Just an idle thought...
Some of the articles and things I've read about Smith leaving have put BC high on the list of favourites to replace him.
 

BloodSquirrel

New member
Jun 23, 2008
1,263
0
0
Matt Smith really grew on me. He made Tenant's doctor seem almost mean-spirited in retrospect. I also like his companions much better- Amy and Rory were great, and Clara had a lot of potential despite being kind of wasted.

I've also liked how Moffat made Who feel like it was really going somewhere, as opposed to trying to pull together a myth arc at the last minute like RTD did when he left. It'd just be nice if the show's plotting could be tightened up and rely on less "The Doctor waved with sonic screwdriver at something and fixed it", "timey-wimey", general handwaves, and so "take our word for it".
 

ayman03

New member
Feb 2, 2012
2
0
0
all will be revealed in the special episode when John Hurt will be in it.
I am curious if he will be a part of the story or simply appears at the end as the 12th Doctor and what it means that the doctor's greatest secret is John Hurt and his name at the same time.Is he from the past or the future?
Why did he reveal the name? and Why is the name itself so important that no one but the doctor should know it?and if he is from the past,then the secret is out,yes?

I am getting a headache
 

rosac

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,204
0
0
TimeLord said:
Katherine Kerensky said:
...So, when and where can I brainwash the BBC to hire Benedict Cumberbatch?
Just an idle thought...
Some of the articles and things I've read about Smith leaving have put BC high on the list of favourites to replace him.
Which is probably why it won't be him! BBC have never really been ones for replacing the doctor with well known actors (as far as I'm aware anyway)
 

DelinquentTurtle

New member
Mar 3, 2012
25
0
0
rosac said:
TimeLord said:
Katherine Kerensky said:
...So, when and where can I brainwash the BBC to hire Benedict Cumberbatch?
Just an idle thought...
Some of the articles and things I've read about Smith leaving have put BC high on the list of favourites to replace him.
Which is probably why it won't be him! BBC have never really been ones for replacing the doctor with well known actors (as far as I'm aware anyway)
What about Christopher Eccleston? Pretty sure he was fairly well known and has had roles in other shows and hollywood movies.
 

Slash Joel

New member
Apr 7, 2011
146
0
0
Well this sucks. Matt Smith is my favorite Doctor and I will be sad to see him go. But I do I would be interested in a female Doctor.
 

rodneyy

humm odd
Sep 10, 2008
175
0
0
DelinquentTurtle said:
rosac said:
TimeLord said:
Katherine Kerensky said:
...So, when and where can I brainwash the BBC to hire Benedict Cumberbatch?
Just an idle thought...
Some of the articles and things I've read about Smith leaving have put BC high on the list of favourites to replace him.
Which is probably why it won't be him! BBC have never really been ones for replacing the doctor with well known actors (as far as I'm aware anyway)
What about Christopher Eccleston? Pretty sure he was fairly well known and has had roles in other shows and hollywood movies.
and David Tennant, he has been in loads of things
 
Feb 28, 2008
689
0
0
TimeLord said:
Katherine Kerensky said:
...So, when and where can I brainwash the BBC to hire Benedict Cumberbatch?
Just an idle thought...
Some of the articles and things I've read about Smith leaving have put BC high on the list of favourites to replace him.
Thinking logically about his commitments to Sherlock and his aspirations in Hollywood I doubt it. Also I heard it said that he has already ruled himself out of playing The Doctor?
 

Karloff

New member
Oct 19, 2009
6,474
0
0
rodneyy said:
DelinquentTurtle said:
rosac said:
TimeLord said:
Katherine Kerensky said:
...So, when and where can I brainwash the BBC to hire Benedict Cumberbatch?
Just an idle thought...
Some of the articles and things I've read about Smith leaving have put BC high on the list of favourites to replace him.
Which is probably why it won't be him! BBC have never really been ones for replacing the doctor with well known actors (as far as I'm aware anyway)
What about Christopher Eccleston? Pretty sure he was fairly well known and has had roles in other shows and hollywood movies.
and David Tennant, he has been in loads of things
Weeeeell, yes and no.

Tennant's a great actor, but if you look at his CV pre-Who, it doesn't amount to much. Lots of TV appearances, miniseries stuff, and you'd be hard pressed to find him in a lead role. Who put him on the map. Eccleston's got UK cred, and had it before Who, but he's always been fonder of the work than of fame. You'd almost think he was allergic to celebrity. When he does pop up in film roles pre-Who, it tends to be high concept stuff like Let Him Have It, or 28 Days Later cult-classic roles, the kind of movie that was never supposed to take off quite the way it did but really caught people's imagination.
 

Piorn

New member
Dec 26, 2007
1,097
0
0
How does the Doctor know he'll leave soon?
Did one of his future incarnations tell him?
 
Aug 1, 2010
2,766
0
0
SuperMse said:
It's meant to excite the imaginations of children and to get them interested in history. To pretend anything else is to ignore the point of the show.
Or maybe you're wrong and there's far FAR more to it than that since there's many dark, complex themes and relatively few episodes focused on history.

OT:
Sad and happy.

I despised Matt at the beginning, but he's grown to rival Tennant as my favorite. I would have loved to have seen him under the direction of a different show runner.

Also, this whole thing is sort of surreal. To be seeing so many people so sad because their first Doctor, Smith, is leaving. It's odd to be in the other position.
 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,672
0
0
Aww, that's a shame. I thought he was a great Doctor, really quirky and interesting, especially compared to Tennant (brilliant actor, but I think Smith's a better Doctor). It's a shame that I haven't really liked most of the writing he's had- even for Who standards, it's been very convoluted.

I was watching the Christmas episode where Tennant's Doctor went to Victorian London and fought the Cybermen, and David Morrisey was brilliant in that (and The Walking Dead, Blackpool and damn near everything he's ever done)- I think he'd make a brilliant Doctor- For my money he's a better actor than Tennant, and he's a bit older and more authoritative too. Other than that, Idris Elba would be a fantastic Doctor, but both of my choices are probably a touch high profile for the role, although they did get Christopher Eccleston, so you never know.

I know a lot of people seem to want Richard Armitage, but he's basically like a slightly-worse David Morrisey, although he's probably a bit more likely.

I'm not against the idea of a female doctor, but I do worry about them continuing to cast younger and younger Doctors though.
 

Alar

The Stormbringer
Dec 1, 2009
1,355
0
0
I wonder if they'd actually take the chance and make a female Doctor... oh, wouldn't that be a hoot? But, sadly, it is quite unlikely.
 

SonofaJohannes

New member
Apr 18, 2011
740
0
0
I sure am looking forward to a new Doctor. Smith wasn't bad, but it's time for a change. I nominate myself.
It would be nice if they got someone visibly older to play the next Doctor, lately the show has been full of these young whippersnappers. Someone that's not British, because the Doctor isn't. And bring back the karate!
 

Ferisar

New member
Oct 2, 2010
814
0
0
Sir Thomas Sean Connery said:
SuperMse said:
It's meant to excite the imaginations of children and to get them interested in history. To pretend anything else is to ignore the point of the show.
Or maybe you're wrong and there's far FAR more to it than that since there's many dark, complex themes and relatively few episodes focused on history.
I actually don't think that he meant that quite as it was stated. A lot of Doctor Who as of now may be partially aimed at a younger audience, but a lot of the subject matter has to do with finding interest in not just history, but the various cases of almost-science. It's just a fun thing for kids to be watching Doctor Who and want to know more about the actual functionality behind the thematic usage of the science concepts.

History is just mixed in the bag because time travel implies travel through historic times as a general rule of thumb.

I do still agree that there is room for something that is a little more edgy, but whimsy has been with the new Who regardless of writer. It was present in the darker Tennant episodes, it was present with Eccleston, it just got more spotlight with Smith. He also just has the persona for being silly and whimsical to begin with, at least seemingly.

And rubs his hands a lot.

OT:

I'm a bit sad. I really liked Smith, exactly because his Doctor was so lighthearted. I hope whoever replaces him gives us an interesting take on the character still, though.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,470
0
0
Smith, I liked your version of The Doctor many times more than Tennant. (well, a big part of that isn't Tennant's fault; but the writing. Of course, it's rare when the writing ISN'T a problem in New Who from what I've seen..)

So I'm assuming that Smith decided to leave on his own, or did the studio decide to introduce the 12th Doctor for the 50th year, or was his contract simply up?

I'm guessing we don't know at all.
 
Aug 1, 2010
2,766
0
0
Ferisar said:
Sir Thomas Sean Connery said:
SuperMse said:
It's meant to excite the imaginations of children and to get them interested in history. To pretend anything else is to ignore the point of the show.
Or maybe you're wrong and there's far FAR more to it than that since there's many dark, complex themes and relatively few episodes focused on history.
I actually don't think that he meant that quite as it was stated. A lot of Doctor Who as of now may be partially aimed at a younger audience, but a lot of the subject matter has to do with finding interest in not just history, but the various cases of almost-science. It's just a fun thing for kids to be watching Doctor Who and want to know more about the actual functionality behind the thematic usage of the science concepts.

History is just mixed in the bag because time travel implies travel through historic times as a general rule of thumb.

I do still agree that there is room for something that is a little more edgy, but whimsy has been with the new Who regardless of writer. It was present in the darker Tennant episodes, it was present with Eccleston, it just got more spotlight with Smith. He also just has the persona for being silly and whimsical to begin with, at least seemingly.

And rubs his hands a lot.
Oh I fully agree both on the subject of whimsy and that it's partially aimed at children. Both are certainly true and I for one love what whimsy they do add. It just irritates me when people seem to imply it's ALL for children and that means adult viewers don't get to have input.

Actually, I wish they would do more spinoff shows. The brilliance of the Sarah Jane Chronicles and Torchwood is that they all had the same awesome universe, but from a totally children oriented view and a totally adult oriented view, respectively, both vanilla Doctor Who in between.
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,666
0
0
A few things.

The biggest point is that whoever is the next Dr has already been cast. Smith is due to leave Dr Who at the end of the 50 th anniversary show which has already has been filmed.

The next point is that regardless of the race or sex of the next Dr, the most probable reaction to the name is going to be Who?........ Ok I'm sorry but I couldn't resist it. The majority of actors that have played the role have not been that well known, the best known actors to take on the role have been Davison, Eccleston and Tennant. Even in the case of those 3 they have only had a few lead roles to their names at the time of casting. The main reason for it because unknown actors are cheap.



Atmos Duality said:
So I'm assuming that Smith decided to leave on his own, or did the studio decide to introduce the 12th Doctor for the 50th year, or was his contract simply up?

I'm guessing we don't know at all.

Smith is in film with Eva Mendes and which is being directed by Ryan Gosling. Hollywood beckons with much bigger paydays and not having to be in Cardiff for 14 weeks of the year.