j.alex said:
Inventive is the very last word I would use to describe him. I read an interesting thread on another forum a while back on him, here it is http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=834560, which might be worth looking through if you have time. If not, the most important points were made in this post:
When I listen to Einaudi all I hear are the barest clichés (eg. 'ritornare' employing an augmented fourth suspended about IV [or presumably VI since this is minor]), with the buzzing fifths in the background all the time like Schubert's organ grinder (but without any of the complex irony in Schubert). Then the figures starts with all those 9ths in... I feel like all development has been evacuated, and all attempt to really explore how something might /feel/ has been replaced by automatic devices that have been well tried and tested for producing 'feeling' -- but deployed almost automatically. If you see what I mean... This is what leaves me so blank. There is also something really bleak about Einaudi's total lack of modualtion or deviation from a diatonic scale, which is the kind of tonal landscape you get at times in Ravel and Debussy, and also in Froberger / earlier contrapunctal composers, and which Bach summons occasionally in Die Kunst -- and it can be genuinely haunting there. But in Einaudi rather than greating a kind of meditative or peaceful stasis it creates just a void.
If people can't tell cliché and artless simplicity from thoughtful simplicity, if they can't tell automated 'emotive' responses to subtle and nuanced responses, this suggests to me that their emotive perception is somehow impaired. It's like crying at a Hollywood happyending: you've been taken in. It's one thing for music/films to be merely entertaining, but if they dictate your capactities for interpreting yoru experience, and in this case we're talking about emotive and empathetic capacities, it worries me that we might as a culture be losing the ability to genuinely feel anything or empathize with anybody. Einaudi's music is inhuman.
is this post yours?
it's a bit of a headache to be honest. It's well-written, but I can't help but feel like I'm reading politician-style rhetoric. I'm going to respond to this rather sporadically, for the sake of keeping myself attentive.
The Hollywood comparison: my love of movies is rather different from my love of music. I make music, constantly-- daily. I'm getting my bachelor's in recording arts, but I'm certainly not indignant about people who make music without training. So, there's some context anyway. With movies, it's sort of a blind love. To some extent my film-major buddies or critics (this includes Movie Bob on this website) rub off on me, but mostly I enjoy whatever movies I connect to most. There's a catch, though, which is how much I find myself absorbed and emotionally committed to what's happening on screen. A movie like Avatar and most melodrama for that matter fail to captivate me for a very identifiable reason. This brings me to your point of "cliche". I would argue the relationship music has with this term and what many movies are guilty of is quite different. Music, in my experience and taste, absolutely (most of the time) has to strike a balance between both tension and release, and thematic placement in order to work most cohesively. What I'm saying is what this person identifies as cliche are merely the tools all musicians use in their compositions. This person is looking for the art in the wrong places with this particular composer. It's in the constant attention to texture and to constructing very clear, very easily digested music. So pointing out the fact that he never pushes boundaries tonally, or rhythmically doesn't really convince me that there's no quality there. oh, and inventive is a tricky word, I'll definitely concede i was the wrong one. The conclusion that it's "thoughtless" is completely beyond my comprehension. This music to me is an exercise in what Einaudi likes best about music, and I think it find it's uniqueness in it's shrugging of traditional complexities assumed necessary.
the end of the post is stupid, pointless, and insulting. just because you don't find value in something, doesn't mean anybody who listens to it doesn't have taste. words like "artless" and "cliche" become meaningless when you are only using them to discount a style you don't like.
emotional value IS a matter of taste. and while this is probably not the best way of achieving that result, there is feeling in these melodies, and there are subtleties of texture I find interesting.
sorry for the long post, and sorry again if any of my points got lost along the way in the mess of it.