Does Bill O'Reilly Think The Simpsons Are Real?

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
Luftwaffles said:
Produce more energy than consumed?????? Does that mean more than 100% efficient???? Excuse me while i go search for my right eyebrow which seems to have migrated up into my scalp.....
I think you posted in the wrong thread...

That said, didn't the OP say that it produced more electricity than it consumed, not energy? Because that would be true, and a rather humorous prank.

That was a good episode. I think the show is coming back from it's slump.
 

leviathanmisha

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,305
0
0
So, does anyone remember those days where we watched FOX because we wanted the NEWS???

OT: I don't actually know what to say to this other than shake my head, sigh deeply, and go watch some more Castle...because at this point that's the only thing that makes any sense...
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
I don't care what O'Reilly says, that may just be the funniest thing the Simpsons have put out since the 90s.
 

Monkfish Acc.

New member
May 7, 2008
4,102
0
0
Bill. Bill.
You might want to complain to your parents, Bill. They raised you a moron.

The Simpsons has always made jibes about Fox. It's good natured. They do it because, being ON Fox, they can get away with it.
If they mocked another network, especially in the earlier years, it would be a potential lawsuit. And it wouldn't be quite as funny.
This is like self-depreciative humour.

Do you need me to explain that, Bill? I know, some of those words are very big. They have two syllables sometimes!

Man, this guy making an idiot of himself is not even news anymore. Why do conservatives think putting their idiots in the public eye is a good idea, anyway.
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
If you're the anchor for Fox news you don't get to complain about anyone making digs at anyone.
 

Alar

The Stormbringer
Dec 1, 2009
1,356
0
0
elvor0 said:
If you're the anchor for Fox news you don't get to complain about anyone making digs at anyone.
You know, normally I would say something about free speech and everyone having the same rights but... I think I agree with this.
 

Lord Honk

New member
Mar 24, 2009
431
0
0
Fronzel said:
"Continuing to bite the hand that feeds part of it, Fox broadcasting once again allows its cartoon characters to run wild."
Wait, that wording makes it seem like Fox broadcasting is "biting the hand that feeds part of it" rather than The Simpsons.
*snip*
A dangling participle! [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4vf8N6GpdM] oO

On topic: O'Reilly clearly has no sense of humor and an attrocious way of expressing that, which makes the situation only funnier IMHO.

edit: embedding the vid was disabled, go follow the link
edit2: Thanks for the spelling correction ;)
 

DarkPanda XIII

New member
Nov 3, 2009
726
0
0
I think O'Reilly took the term "The Characters write for themselves" A weee bit too seriously. But really, check yourself out before you argue your point across, then you won't feel silly before the end of it.
 

Ayjona

New member
Jul 14, 2008
183
0
0
Elizabeth Grunewald said:
but his statement seems to indicate that the cartoons are the ones writing the jokes.
It is a a stylistic device, a figure of speech, a metaphor, and one that is clearly understandable. There are many things that are wrong with Fox News and Bill O'Reilly, but this is not even the least bit peculiar.

Ascribing autonomous behaviour to fictional characters is rather common, and has used to refer to characters in both tv shows, literature, movies, computer games and comics for the past 20-100 years (depending on the media in question).

The real news is that Bill O'Reilly is speaking out against The Simpsons as a tv show, and the way the writers of the Simpsons joke about, and, in so doing criticize, Fox. Perhaps that should have been reflected in the title instead.

To me, this seems instead to be a very thinly stretched attempt at making fun of something that would have been much more pertinent as a piece of relevant social commentary.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
I think your stretching to make fun of O'Reilly here. He's not my favorite guy in the world (despite being pretty right wing) but I easily understood what he was saying.

I think his point was that Fox is not holding it's cartoonists to any standards, and that if he blasted his bosses on the air like that, he'd be fired. I can see his point.

I can get that Fox's animated shows are largely done by liberals, and Fox, or at least the news portion, doesn't lean as far left as they would like. There are still things they shouldn't be doing.

To put it bluntly if I worked there, and the guys doing "The Simpsons" did that without someone being fired, I'd be POed myself. That's like a guy from another department insulting you on the billboard or whatever, except this isn't even just "in house" it's in front of a national audience. Whether you agree with what is being said in the cartoon here (and don't like Fox News) that isn't really what this is about. If I worked for these guys and someone did something like that, and my bosses didn't do something about it, I'd be pretty POed. "Joke" aside, it would tell me I wasn't valued. If I'm getting O'Reilly's response here I don't think this was something the Fox News team was "in" on.
 

Canid117

New member
Oct 6, 2009
4,075
0
0
I thought the Simpsons made more money than his show. Doesn't that mean the Simpsons feeds fox?
 

Flauros

New member
Mar 2, 2010
475
0
0
Anyone see the clip where bill oreilly threatens a little girl and tries to get social services to take her away for saying hes a bad liar? lol

They seem to have no morals at FOX news....
 

Canid117

New member
Oct 6, 2009
4,075
0
0
Flauros said:
Anyone see the clip where bill oreilly threatens a little girl and tries to get social services to take her away for saying hes a bad liar? lol

They seem to have no morals at FOX news....
Link plz