No, my example is this: Dead baby jokes are awful and not funny, they are not funny because they involve dead babies. It's not cool to kill babies and illegal in some places to get an abortion. Humour does not suspend morals or offensiveness.
The class was learning about some revolt in which some peasants had wanted to stop being peasants and, since the nobles had won, had stopped being peasants really quickly.Fistful of Ebola said:In a word: no. Offensive so-called "jokes" are often aimed directly at disempowered, vulnerable minorities in humor derived by the privileged for the benefit of the privileged.
This is particularly true around the Holocaust. Look at Spielberg, he can whip out the silliest of movies with Indiana Jones and slapstick comedy involving nazis... and then he can make Schindler's List. Or in the case of Mel Brooks, "I'm the only Jew who ever made a buck outta Hitler". What better way of dealing with Hitler than laughing at him (NOT because of him, but AT him) for the rest of human history?amaranth_dru said:I sometimes feel that society is becoming way too sensitive, and that in order to combat the "evils" we see in the world we must be able to laugh at it and make it ridiculous. That doesn't mean necessarily trivializing a person's experience but rather blowing a scenario out to ludicrous proportions in order to distance ourselves from it.
Comedy is someone else's tragedy.
No. I just wanted to insert some black comedy into the thread.Fistful of Ebola said:I've written two different responses to this and came to the conclusion I don't have any clue what your point is supposed to be. Do you believe that Terry Pratchett's black humor using a fictional underclass somehow undermines my own point?