Morrowind fan here.Shim3d said:I'm not talking about graphics as they don't matter too much to me, but is Morrowind so highly praised in a Deus Ex kinda way where it's mostly nostalgia holding it up, or a Painkiller kinda way where it actually is fun compared to modern games?
EDIT: OH GOD I'm not saying Deus Ex isn't fun!
Morrowind was good, it had atmosphere and created a world that I wanted to play in, a huge and detailed world at that. It felt more crafted than Oblivion, more attention to detail perhaps, but Oblivion was better at grabbing the player and thrusting quests in their face, where as Morrowind was the sort of game where you could forget what the hell you were supposed to be doing and then wander round for 30 hours trying to find out again, an RPG really ought to be more engaging than that IMO.Shim3d said:I'm not talking about graphics as they don't matter too much to me, but is Morrowind so highly praised in a Deus Ex kinda way where it's mostly nostalgia holding it up, or a Painkiller kinda way where it actually is fun compared to modern games?
EDIT: OH GOD I'm not saying Deus Ex isn't fun!
Hmm good question, it has actually been a while since I last got into Morrowind. I think Morrowind could easily hold it's own with Oblivion, but I am not sure about Skyrim. I think Skyrim just might beat it. Then again I am one of those extreme minority hated ones who actually likes good graphics in games.Shim3d said:I'm not talking about graphics as they don't matter too much to me, but is Morrowind so highly praised in a Deus Ex kinda way where it's mostly nostalgia holding it up, or a Painkiller kinda way where it actually is fun compared to modern games?
EDIT: OH GOD I'm not saying Deus Ex isn't fun!
I note the sarcasm but of course you realise its not liking good graphics that is the problem right? its placing graphics before gameplay that stokes the wrath of the nerd gamer.A Free Man said:Then again I am one of those extreme minority hated ones who actually likes good graphics in games.
The-Epicly-Named-Man said:Not really (strictly from a gameplay perspective). It's still great, and I prefer it to Oblivion, but the combat is absolutely terrible.
I'd just like to point out that a good RPG doesnt stand on its combat so combat alone should never be a reason to disregard an RPG. Too many gamers these days are weaned on bastard (in the literal sense) action-RPG hybrids (thanks Bioware) that they unfairly expect all RPGs to have a solid action core... thats just not what RPG is about.InterAirplay said:Nevertheless, the combat doesn't hold up in the fucking slightest. That includes the magic, which you can't mix with combat in any convenient way. I still love the game though, just because I'm the kind of RPG-fag that will forgive any game that gives me an adventure.
The only recent Bioware game... since... gah, Baldurs Gate maybe? That really struck me as having really good writing was DA2. Mass Effect and Jade Empire were kind of serviceable in a slathered with cheese kind of way.InterAirplay said:Good thing you pointed that out, I was about to start white knighting about Bioware.Continuity said:I note the sarcasm but of course you realise its not liking good graphics that is the problem right? its placing graphics before gameplay that stokes the wrath of the nerd gamer.A Free Man said:Then again I am one of those extreme minority hated ones who actually likes good graphics in games.
The-Epicly-Named-Man said:Not really (strictly from a gameplay perspective). It's still great, and I prefer it to Oblivion, but the combat is absolutely terrible.I'd just like to point out that a good RPG doesnt stand on its combat so combat alone should never be a reason to disregard an RPG. Too many gamers these days are weaned on bastard (in the literal sense) action-RPG hybrids (thanks Bioware) that they unfairly expect all RPGs to have a solid action core... thats just not what RPG is about.InterAirplay said:Nevertheless, the combat doesn't hold up in the fucking slightest. That includes the magic, which you can't mix with combat in any convenient way. I still love the game though, just because I'm the kind of RPG-fag that will forgive any game that gives me an adventure.
But then i'm a crusty old-school gamer so just get off my lawn and all that...
Then again, I do think Combat is far more important than that. But that's just me.
And actually, bollocks to bioware. Recently I've started noticing massive holes in their games, ME2 I liked but on reflection it was steadily sliding downhill when compared to ME1, most especially in terms of story.
And now that Bethesda has managed to put an entire country in a box in Skyrim, I pity them. TES isn't pulling any punches and it shows. I'm starting to develop unreasonable standards, because Bioware games are starting to feel pathetically small and aneamic to me just now.
I guess Bethesda just has practice at this sort of thing, and now that their tech and resources are shaping up it's starting to really show. I understand that other RPG's will still sell well, but I'm starting to pity other developers a little. What on earth can stand against something as massive as Skyrim?
The weird thing about that post was that you said "put gameplay before graphics", then when someone said that the gameplay was crap you said that the world compensates for it. Having a good world is good and all, but when everything feels stiff and artificial (like in Morrowind) experiencing the world will always be hindered by the crap gameplay.Continuity said:I note the sarcasm but of course you realise its not liking good graphics that is the problem right? its placing graphics before gameplay that stokes the wrath of the nerd gamer.A Free Man said:Then again I am one of those extreme minority hated ones who actually likes good graphics in games.
The-Epicly-Named-Man said:Not really (strictly from a gameplay perspective). It's still great, and I prefer it to Oblivion, but the combat is absolutely terrible.I'd just like to point out that a good RPG doesnt stand on its combat so combat alone should never be a reason to disregard an RPG. Too many gamers these days are weaned on bastard (in the literal sense) action-RPG hybrids (thanks Bioware) that they unfairly expect all RPGs to have a solid action core... thats just not what RPG is about.InterAirplay said:Nevertheless, the combat doesn't hold up in the fucking slightest. That includes the magic, which you can't mix with combat in any convenient way. I still love the game though, just because I'm the kind of RPG-fag that will forgive any game that gives me an adventure.
But then i'm a crusty old-school gamer so just get off my lawn and all that...
Whoa there buddy, you just made the cardinal mistake of conflating gameplay and combat, they are not the same thing, a game with no combat at all still has gameplay.ToastiestZombie said:The weird thing about that post was that you said "put gameplay before graphics", then when someone said that the gameplay was crap you said that the world compensates for it. Having a good world is good and all, but when everything feels stiff and artificial (like in Morrowind) experiencing the world will always be hindered by the crap gameplay.
Yes but when the actual gameplay still is very bad, and the combat is bad. Just because there may be one gameplay feature that is good doesnt mean it excuses all the other bad gameplay features. Here's some example of bad gameplay that is not combat related.Continuity said:Whoa there buddy, you just made the cardinal mistake of conflating gameplay and combat, they are not the same thing, a game with no combat at all still has gameplay.ToastiestZombie said:The weird thing about that post was that you said "put gameplay before graphics", then when someone said that the gameplay was crap you said that the world compensates for it. Having a good world is good and all, but when everything feels stiff and artificial (like in Morrowind) experiencing the world will always be hindered by the crap gameplay.