Does SEGA listen

[R4GNOR0K]

i recently came across and IGN review of Sonic and the black knight which got a 3.9 out of 10 the presentation, graphics and sound were all pretty good but the game play and lasting appeal were very bad which has been the problem with most current day sonic games which got me wondering does SEGA or more specifically Sonic Team read there reviews and try and improve there games or do they not really give a crap and just release games to keep their jobs.




Review: http://wii.ign.com/articles/958/958855p2.html

 

[RebelRising]

I think this says it all:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.92258

 

[countrysteaksauce]

Didn't they already say they're not out to appeal to the long term fans but rather the kids whose parents have the money to buy them shovelware for the wii?

 

[quack35]

The werehog was NOT THAT FUCKING BAD. Jesus Christ, people.

 

[Sketchy]

The werehog was NOT THAT FUCKING BAD. Jesus Christ, people.

Take it back...

But seriously, the Werehog was absolutely terrible.

 

[ElArabDeMagnifico]

The werehog was NOT THAT FUCKING BAD. Jesus Christ, people.

-but it's not running through obstacle courses at mach 1.

 

[maddawg IAJI]

to qoute zp

short answer:no
long answer:noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.

sonic is like star wars. at first it was great but after years of the same thing it gets old.

am i saying sonic will die out?
short answer:yesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.

 

[cj_iwakura]

If they were smart, they'd stick to 2D games.

Sonic Rush was a step in the right direction.

This crap, not so much.

(Then again, I liked Sonic Adventure 1 & 2, but that's it as 3D goes)