Heathrow said:I'm one of the sentient bits of universe, and I want to know how I work. So, yes.
I say it is unexplainable.
Heathrow said:I'm one of the sentient bits of universe, and I want to know how I work. So, yes.
The second i can answer that a) I'll let you know b) i'll collect my nobel prizeEternal Taros said:Yes I agree that it was a bad example.
Even with your new example, question that remains is, why?
Why does observation alter the results?
While we can imagine things we lack the words to describe, we find it very hard to describe something when lacking the appropriate vocabulary, and by vocabulary i don't only mean natural language, but also the math, symbols & logic to frame to concepts and questions. To me it does boil down to a problem of vocabulary, but by that i mean far more than the words the two of us use to communicate. In my head, i have no problem uniting the duality of lightWe are detecting emitted photons, something that does not in any way effect the system.
That very result is unexpected and completely nonsensical.
I don't think that its a vocabulary issue.
Our lack of adequate vocabulary has absolutely nothing to do with our ability to understand something.
We can always imagine things we have no vocabulary to describe.
http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2010/10/25/f1eb1ea9-81df-4694-9013-22a83f97f9b4.jpgHeathrow said:Those are yams.wackymon said:[...]
Does my sandwich want to be eaten?Thetwistedendgame said:Now, with all the things going on about particles going faster then light(thought to be impossible) and theories like Schrodinger's cat to confuse us even more, I have concluded that the Universe is sentient and will not and cannot, for some reason, let itself be fully explained. My theory is that for every mystery we solve will be another confusing situation, and it will carry on like a match of ping pong for the rest of all eternity, until the Universe decides to cheat and wipe us off itself like a human wipes an ant off of his knee. Thoughts, arguments, and opinions.