Dogs Align With Earth's Magnetic Field While Pooping, Study Finds

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
So, logically, I can control when and where a dog takes a crap using magnetic fields?
 

CrazyGirl17

I am a banana!
Sep 11, 2009
5,141
0
0
Baffle said:
CrazyGirl17 said:
...Okay, why did people feel the need to study this? Is it really so necessary to know the direction my dog faces when she poops on the carpet? You'd think there'd be more important things to study...
Why don't you just train her to crap on someone else's carpet? Or, better, outside. I've never had to train a dog, but just screaming at the cats every time they look like crapping generally stops them.
Eh, sometimes she does it late at night when no one's able to take her out... we're still working on that one.
 

Ed130 The Vanguard

(Insert witty quote here)
Sep 10, 2008
3,782
0
0
happy_turtle said:
This is absolute bollocks. I worked in a free-range kennels for a few years, and the dogs pooped or peed in random places on the various fields. Trust the Germans to study poop and still fail miserably.
Please read.

MarlaDesat said:
Dogs prefer alignment along the magnetic north-south axis, but only in periods of calm magnetic field conditions." Solar winds and the magnetic field of the sun can cause instabilities in Earth's magnetic field, including geomagnetic storms [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/magnetic/]. Minor instabilities may disrupt your pooch's bathroom habits, but major ones can cause telecommunications blackouts. During the study, unstable magnetic field conditions were present 70 percent of the time.
Well, it's one way to get an Ig Nobel.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Sleekit said:
FalloutJack said:
So, logically, I can control when and where a dog takes a crap using magnetic fields?
i sense a cunning plan...possibly involving a disliked neighbour and buried electromagnets...

By using my sonic screwdriver at setting A-32, I can repel the dog's bum from Earth's magnetic field and send the packet hurtling through the air at some unsuspecting passerby. Gentlemen, I present to you the instant dog cannon, preferably used on something large like a Mastiff or a Great Dane.
 

Bostur

New member
Mar 14, 2011
1,070
0
0
Houseman said:
My dog must be broken. He walks when he poops. He takes the squat stance, but he keeps on walking, mostly in circles.
I think you need to upgrade the firmware.


Maybe dogs don't orient themselves according to magnetic fields, but choose the side of something that is dry. If I had to poop next to a tree or in high grass, I would choose a spot that wouldn't make me wet. Or maybe they prefer the moist side for some reason, or a spot with the most growth to hide their poop.
 

Caffiene

New member
Jul 21, 2010
283
0
0
The study is a load of DS.

The paper shows a clear bias, where the authors are trying to justify their chosen conclusion from the start rather than discussing the actual evidence. Just for starters, they examined multiple variables, which introduces "degrees of freedom" that allows all sorts of biases to creep in. They even state in the paper that they didnt get the result they wanted, so they changed their method - they pretty much say straight out that the first statistical analysis they tried didnt show anything so they tried a different one to get a result.

This isnt even remotely newsworthy unless or until a better, more reliable replication is done.
 
Mar 30, 2010
3,785
0
0
Great, so when I spend hours in my local park watching dogs poop I'm a weirdo, but when a bunch of Germans do it it's research.

Bloody double standards.
 

Daaaah Whoosh

New member
Jun 23, 2010
1,041
0
0
Maybe the dogs were just trying to orient themselves away from the strange scientists and their cameras.
 

-Dragmire-

King over my mind
Mar 29, 2011
2,821
0
0
Random question, would an MRI scan really screw up these magnetically sensitive animals?
 

Pyrian

Hat Man
Legacy
Jul 8, 2011
1,399
8
13
San Diego, CA
Country
US
Gender
Male
Caffiene said:
Just for starters, they examined multiple variables, which introduces "degrees of freedom" that allows all sorts of biases to creep in. They even state in the paper that they didnt get the result they wanted, so they changed their method - they pretty much say straight out that the first statistical analysis they tried didnt show anything so they tried a different one to get a result.
This. It's a huge red flag. If you just keep throwing analyses at a dataset without taking into account the increasing degrees of freedom, sooner or later you'll "find" a "correlation" just by chance.
 

zerragonoss

New member
Oct 15, 2009
333
0
0
GamerMage said:
Icehearted said:
That this is an article is dwarfed by this being a study. No, there's no need to pour more funding into our sex robots and hover-cars, that dog's taking a shit and we must know it's secrets.
Agreed, instead of having Deus Ex: Human Revolution level Cybernetics or having Real Life Gundams, we have to pour our research in dogs taking a dump. (Sigh) God...Dang it. /facedesk
How is studying how organic life interacts with magnetic fields, and how they are affected by them, not working towards cybernetics?
 

Fijiman

I am THE PANTS!
Legacy
Dec 1, 2011
16,509
0
1
Well, on the bright side at least this proves that they're doing actual research instead of just fucking around with the money they're given.
 

Reed Spacer

That guy with the thing.
Jan 11, 2011
841
0
0
The fact that someone created a study on this suggests that our scientists have way too much time on their hands.

Shouldn't they be designing pollution-free cars or death rays or something?
 

Olas

Hello!
Dec 24, 2011
3,226
0
0
TO EVERYONE QUESTING THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS RESEARCH.

-1. Many scientific discoveries happen by accident when studying something seemingly unrelated. You never know what could be important.

-2. Pouring more money and manpower into research isn't going to magically guarantee faster or better results, so it's not like this is all money going to waste that could be put towards finding a cure for cancer or something. People are already trying to do that elsewhere and won't be significantly helped by whatever measly assets went into this.

-3. Considering the popularity and ubiquity of dogs in many countries, and their usefulness in policework and other public services, I would think that understanding them and what they're capable of would be worthwhile knowledge.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
I do not have a dog but i had to take care of one for my newphiew for a while they were out of country, and i call DogShit on this study. it pooped in every direction it could find.

Johny_X2 said:
think about it. people keep saying that they have either good or bad sense of direction but how? why?
I cant speak for anyone else, but personally i sort o "draw a map" whenever i visit a place ive never been in. sort of similar to how you "Explore the map" in RPG games. with landmarks that i notice being... well... landmarks. this way if i get lost i can always "look up at the map" inside my head to orient myself better. It doesnt work 100% of course, and its hard to ind landmarks when colelcting shrooms in a forest, but i have found a way out for the group couple times so i guess it counts for something.

OlasDAlmighty said:
-2. Pouring more money and manpower into research isn't going to magically guarantee faster or better results, so it's not like this is all money going to waste that could be put towards finding a cure for cancer or something. People are already trying to do that elsewhere and won't be significantly helped by whatever measly assets went into this.
While this is true, to be honest pouring more money into cancer research would help, or rather pouring more server power to cancer research would help since they do a lot of simulations on computer and are basically limited by computing speed there, so giving them a supercomputer or two to play with would speed up the process.
 

AngloDoom

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,461
0
0
OlasDAlmighty said:
TO EVERYONE QUESTING THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS RESEARCH.

-1. Many scientific discoveries happen by accident when studying something seemingly unrelated. You never know what could be important.

-2. Pouring more money and manpower into research isn't going to magically guarantee faster or better results, so it's not like this is all money going to waste that could be put towards finding a cure for cancer or something. People are already trying to do that elsewhere and won't be significantly helped by whatever measly assets went into this.

-3. Considering the popularity and ubiquity of dogs in many countries, and their usefulness in policework and other public services, I would think that understanding them and what they're capable of would be worthwhile knowledge.
This. Jesus, why is the Escapist so down on everything recently? Can't we have a website-wide Resolution to have a little bit of optimism for once?

OT:

That's just unfair. We have terrible senses and now it turns out that our 'best friends' have been holding out an entirely new sense we don't have.

Thanks a lot, dogs.