Eh, sometimes she does it late at night when no one's able to take her out... we're still working on that one.Baffle said:Why don't you just train her to crap on someone else's carpet? Or, better, outside. I've never had to train a dog, but just screaming at the cats every time they look like crapping generally stops them.CrazyGirl17 said:...Okay, why did people feel the need to study this? Is it really so necessary to know the direction my dog faces when she poops on the carpet? You'd think there'd be more important things to study...
Please read.happy_turtle said:This is absolute bollocks. I worked in a free-range kennels for a few years, and the dogs pooped or peed in random places on the various fields. Trust the Germans to study poop and still fail miserably.
Well, it's one way to get an Ig Nobel.MarlaDesat said:Dogs prefer alignment along the magnetic north-south axis, but only in periods of calm magnetic field conditions." Solar winds and the magnetic field of the sun can cause instabilities in Earth's magnetic field, including geomagnetic storms [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/magnetic/]. Minor instabilities may disrupt your pooch's bathroom habits, but major ones can cause telecommunications blackouts. During the study, unstable magnetic field conditions were present 70 percent of the time.
Sleekit said:i sense a cunning plan...possibly involving a disliked neighbour and buried electromagnets...FalloutJack said:So, logically, I can control when and where a dog takes a crap using magnetic fields?
I think you need to upgrade the firmware.Houseman said:My dog must be broken. He walks when he poops. He takes the squat stance, but he keeps on walking, mostly in circles.
This. It's a huge red flag. If you just keep throwing analyses at a dataset without taking into account the increasing degrees of freedom, sooner or later you'll "find" a "correlation" just by chance.Caffiene said:Just for starters, they examined multiple variables, which introduces "degrees of freedom" that allows all sorts of biases to creep in. They even state in the paper that they didnt get the result they wanted, so they changed their method - they pretty much say straight out that the first statistical analysis they tried didnt show anything so they tried a different one to get a result.
How is studying how organic life interacts with magnetic fields, and how they are affected by them, not working towards cybernetics?GamerMage said:Agreed, instead of having Deus Ex: Human Revolution level Cybernetics or having Real Life Gundams, we have to pour our research in dogs taking a dump. (Sigh) God...Dang it. /facedeskIcehearted said:That this is an article is dwarfed by this being a study. No, there's no need to pour more funding into our sex robots and hover-cars, that dog's taking a shit and we must know it's secrets.
I cant speak for anyone else, but personally i sort o "draw a map" whenever i visit a place ive never been in. sort of similar to how you "Explore the map" in RPG games. with landmarks that i notice being... well... landmarks. this way if i get lost i can always "look up at the map" inside my head to orient myself better. It doesnt work 100% of course, and its hard to ind landmarks when colelcting shrooms in a forest, but i have found a way out for the group couple times so i guess it counts for something.Johny_X2 said:think about it. people keep saying that they have either good or bad sense of direction but how? why?
While this is true, to be honest pouring more money into cancer research would help, or rather pouring more server power to cancer research would help since they do a lot of simulations on computer and are basically limited by computing speed there, so giving them a supercomputer or two to play with would speed up the process.OlasDAlmighty said:-2. Pouring more money and manpower into research isn't going to magically guarantee faster or better results, so it's not like this is all money going to waste that could be put towards finding a cure for cancer or something. People are already trying to do that elsewhere and won't be significantly helped by whatever measly assets went into this.
This. Jesus, why is the Escapist so down on everything recently? Can't we have a website-wide Resolution to have a little bit of optimism for once?OlasDAlmighty said:TO EVERYONE QUESTING THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS RESEARCH.
-1. Many scientific discoveries happen by accident when studying something seemingly unrelated. You never know what could be important.
-2. Pouring more money and manpower into research isn't going to magically guarantee faster or better results, so it's not like this is all money going to waste that could be put towards finding a cure for cancer or something. People are already trying to do that elsewhere and won't be significantly helped by whatever measly assets went into this.
-3. Considering the popularity and ubiquity of dogs in many countries, and their usefulness in policework and other public services, I would think that understanding them and what they're capable of would be worthwhile knowledge.