Lost? Pah! If I want to see a complex story in which complex characters have to unravel a time-traveling mystery in a closed-off world that plays by its own rules, I'll read Homestuck [http://www.mspaintadventures.com/].
But I agree completely. It's curious how television has none of the stigma surrounding, say, videogames and graphic novels, and yet suffers from the same problem that only a few visionaries try to stretch the media to its limit. Television should be considered a long form version of a movie, it should be to cinema what a novel is to a short story, but no, only pragmatic, formulaic shows are allowed to shine.
I wonder how much TV will be hurt by the growth of the internet. I guess not much, because of the so called fourty-five degrees (i.e. you need to be sitting up to use a computer but can be lying back to watch TV, so even if using a computer is objectively better than watching TV sometimes people will prefer the passive activity). Which is too bad because it needs to be shaken up a tad.
But I agree completely. It's curious how television has none of the stigma surrounding, say, videogames and graphic novels, and yet suffers from the same problem that only a few visionaries try to stretch the media to its limit. Television should be considered a long form version of a movie, it should be to cinema what a novel is to a short story, but no, only pragmatic, formulaic shows are allowed to shine.
I wonder how much TV will be hurt by the growth of the internet. I guess not much, because of the so called fourty-five degrees (i.e. you need to be sitting up to use a computer but can be lying back to watch TV, so even if using a computer is objectively better than watching TV sometimes people will prefer the passive activity). Which is too bad because it needs to be shaken up a tad.