Dr Who : Before The Flood

Recommended Videos

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,666
0
0
After last week's good setup, the end of the story felt rather contrived. It felt like a long winded setup for a rather weak pay off. It also left a rather major hook dangling that, I suspect will re appear at the end of the series. Is it my dirty mind or was there a rather blatant reference to S&M in this week's show?
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
20,120
4,500
118
Eh, it wasn't that bad, but was rather flat after last week's one.

Also, can we not have a long angsty blather on about a regular character dying, when we know they didn't? Especially when randoms get killed and nobody cares.
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,666
0
0
thaluikhain said:
Eh, it wasn't that bad, but was rather flat after last week's one.

Also, can we not have a long angsty blather on about a regular character dying, when we know they didn't? Especially when randoms get killed and nobody cares.
To be fair the point was the Dr didn't care about the random ones.
 
Dec 10, 2012
867
0
0
albino boo said:
After last week's good setup, the end of the story felt rather contrived. It felt like a long winded setup for a rather weak pay off.
Agreed. We're getting a lot from Doctor Who these days. Dark Water was awesome, but Death in Heaven was much weaker, and felt like it should have been half an hour long. Similar situation here.

albino boo said:
It also left a rather major hook dangling that, I suspect will re appear at the end of the series
Oh, it most definitely will. But Moffat's season long 'arcs' are really feeling like an afterthought these days. Again, last season demonstrated this. The whole 'Am I a good man?' question, that was barely touched on for 11 episodes and then supposedly 'resolved' at the very end of the season, was just flimsy and token.

albino boo said:
Is it my dirty mind or was there a rather blatant reference to S&M in this week's show?
Oh yes, your dirty, dirty mind is very correct about that.
 

Goliath100

New member
Sep 29, 2009
437
0
0
So the first 2 parter mentions a prophecy. The 4th episode is about predestination paradox. Do we got a theme going?
 

totheendofsin

some asshole made me set this up
Jul 31, 2009
417
0
0
so I have a question, is this just going to be a season of two parters?

looking at the episode titles it seems like they all go in pairs

I hope not, two parters are nice but they get exhausting after a while
 

Bobular

New member
Oct 7, 2009
845
0
0
I liked it, but thought the first part was better.

The ghosts are going to come up again, no doubt in my mind there, but does anyone else think that the Fisher King will return? I'd say he's aquatic looking at him, so a flood wont stop him. I hope so because I quite liked that design.

Also:
Minister of War?
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,418
0
0
It was alright, but after the section on the predestination paradox i pretty much figured out what was going to happen.

Goliath100 said:
So the first 2 parter mentions a prophecy. The 4th episode is about predestination paradox. Do we got a theme going?
Hopefully so. It seems to be working for this season so far.
 

Generalissimo

Your Commander-in-Chief
Legacy
Jun 15, 2011
831
0
21
Country
UK
TheVampwizimp said:
albino boo said:
After last week's good setup, the end of the story felt rather contrived. It felt like a long winded setup for a rather weak pay off.
Agreed. We're getting a lot from Doctor Who these days. Dark Water was awesome, but Death in Heaven was much weaker, and felt like it should have been half an hour long. Similar situation here.

albino boo said:
It also left a rather major hook dangling that, I suspect will re appear at the end of the series
Oh, it most definitely will. But Moffat's season long 'arcs' are really feeling like an afterthought these days. Again, last season demonstrated this. The whole 'Am I a good man?' question, that was barely touched on for 11 episodes and then supposedly 'resolved' at the very end of the season, was just flimsy and token.

albino boo said:
Is it my dirty mind or was there a rather blatant reference to S&M in this week's show?
Oh yes, your dirty, dirty mind is very correct about that.
where was that? It's seems my rather clean mind has missed it
 

Albino Boo

New member
Jun 14, 2010
4,666
0
0
Generalissimo said:
where was that? It's seems my rather clean mind has missed it
Prentis the undertaker said he had a range of instruments to use on him, if the Dr would like to "conquer" him
 

Quellist

Migratory coconut
Oct 7, 2010
1,443
0
0
Am i totally daft or is there no good reason the Fisher King couldn't have just said "Oi Prentiss, I'm not dead, now take me back to my homeworld instead of that dump you plan to bury me on?" Thus circumventing the whole Ghost radio thing?
 

Quellist

Migratory coconut
Oct 7, 2010
1,443
0
0
The_Kodu said:
Quellist said:
Am i totally daft or is there no good reason the Fisher King couldn't have just said "Oi Prentiss, I'm not dead, now take me back to my homeworld instead of that dump you plan to bury me on?" Thus circumventing the whole Ghost radio thing?
He couldn't go back.

Remember Prentiss said they'd been invaded and overtaken again.

Chances are the Fisher King faked his own death to escape from the new invading army.
I didn't mean back to Tivoli, I meant his actual Homeworld, the place he was trying to summon an army from. Surely going there directly would be a whole lot more convenient than waiting for them to decode a mysterious signal