Let me put it this way. Hollywood only cares about sequels of movies that had success; they don't care about the quality of the movie if no one saw it; and marketing can turn the shitiest of movies into big hits.AstaresPanda said:so am i getting this right.
Make a good movie + crappy marketing = shitty movie and a fail.
Make a shitty movie + market the shit out of it = great movie worth milking the shit out of. ok then.
You beat me to it.AstaresPanda said:so am i getting this right.
Make a good movie + crappy marketing = shitty movie and a fail.
Make a shitty movie + market the shit out of it = great movie worth milking the shit out of. ok then.
Yes. Yes it was that poor. Whoever handled advertising for Dredd dropped the ball, then stepped on it, squeezing all the air out of the ball, then they covered the ball in gasoline and set fire on it before burying the ashes of the ball in an anonymous shallow grave.croc3629 said:There truly is no justice in this world.
Was the advertising for Dredd really that poor? Were people just not interested?
Why?
Brought it up again before The Master, after he'd watched it, confirming that yes it was that good.Sanunes said:If you watch the video for that week (Resident Evil Retribution) he couldn't make the only critic review because he was on an airplane coming back from The Escapist Expo and the people he trusts said it was "pretty good". Which is unusual for he rarely talks about a movie he doesn't review.Fat_Hippo said:For some unfathomable reason, this movie didn't even get a lot of attention on the internet. Hell, even Moviebob didn't mention it, as far as I can recall, and it seems like it would be right up his alley.