Saying that he should be alive as to serve as a vital step in her rehabilitation process is not refuted by doubting that she wants to see him again. Even if she does go through with it's going to be hard on her.thaluikhain said:Sometimes yes, but I'd hardly be surprised if she wanted never to see him again
Being abused increases the chances that someone will become an abuser, but most aren't. If nothing else, most perpetrators are male, and most victims are female.
And, he's not "clearly" suffering from a mental illness just because he commits a terrible crime. That's nothing more than othering, saying one of Us would never do something like that.
So concern at worryingly high degree of bloodlust is the same as bloodlust.LetalisK said:When both are ineffectual and ultimately meaningless harumphs to boost one's own sense of righteousness? Yep.
You're so silly, just because your opinion on something is hypocritical doesn't mean every opinion on anything is hypocritical. That would be crazy. It's only about 97% of them.Ninjamedic said:So concern at worryingly high degree of bloodlust is the same as bloodlust.LetalisK said:When both are ineffectual and ultimately meaningless harumphs to boost one's own sense of righteousness? Yep.
I forgot, this is the internet, where stating my opinion on anything automatically makes me a hypocrite.
You're correct there is a difference between the illness and acting upon it. However the current situation is one which maximizes the odds for things to go wrong. On one hand it is impossible to act upon these desires in a morally acceptable and legal way and on the other hand there is such a stigma attached to it people who suffer from it don't dare to seek help. Until the latter stops being true I will keep on preferring sending those people, even those who acted upon it, on therapy or in psychiatric institutions rather than jail.The Almighty Aardvark said:There's a big distinction between pedophiles and rapists though. Just because you have a sexual attraction to children doesn't force you to rape them. Hatred to pedophiles I will agree with you, it creates more problems than it solves. This guy isn't just a pedophile though.
Doing something like that to a three year old is horrible. And he did it multiple times. He didn't seek therapy or treatment for his mental illness for 8 years. Only time he goes pleading mental illness is when he's been caught and being threatened with jail time. No, he doesn't deserve to die in jail, but that doesn't mean that he should get out of jail free card. As far as I know that's not customary for child molesters to just be thrown on probation, I wouldn't be surprised if money turned this into his favor, be it through bribes, status, or just the fact he could afford good enough lawyers.
I wonder what would be the solution if some one started having pedophilic thoughts but didn't act on them. self castration/ castration is probably the first thing that comes to mind since they couldn't really go get help for it unless they wanna be shunned fro the rest of their life. of course their's always the bullet to the head, save everyone some time.LetalisK said:You're so silly, just because your opinion on something is hypocritical doesn't mean every opinion on anything is hypocritical. That would be crazy. It's only about 97% of them.Ninjamedic said:So concern at worryingly high degree of bloodlust is the same as bloodlust.LetalisK said:When both are ineffectual and ultimately meaningless harumphs to boost one's own sense of righteousness? Yep.
I forgot, this is the internet, where stating my opinion on anything automatically makes me a hypocrite.
You mean besides the fact that criminality in the states isn't at an all time low nor does it have harsh prison terms and most criminals can buy their way out of their sentences?SecretNegative said:And this attitude is exactly why criminality in the US and other countries with harsh prison terms is at an all-time low, and why recidivism rates in countries like Norway who specialise in rehabilitation rather than revenge is shy-high. And it has been scientifically proven that the harsher punishments, the lower the crime rate.canadamus_prime said:Really? How does understanding why he's a sick fuck help her recover?softclocks said:That doesn't solve anything.canadamus_prime said:Maybe not, but at least he'd be forced to suffer for it.
Oftentimes later interactions between victim and perpetrator can help the victim overcome some of the problems they're likely to struggle with. Having this guy shanked in prison harms the little girl's chances of recovering from her trauma.
Edit: And this guy's already suffering. He's clearly suffering from some kind of mental illness and odds are he was abused as a child as well.
Also suffering from a mental illness and suffering for your crimes are not the same thing. Nor should mental illness be an excuse.
Oh wait, hmm, soemthing isn't quite right about that sentence, can you point it out?
I don't think right even figures into the equation. He probably wouldn't do well in prison, but that doesn't make him any less deserving of it. I think it speaks volumes that child rapists are even despised by the dregs of humanity.game-lover said:As much as this infuriates me, the judge was probably right.
There's that saying about what happens to child rapists in prison...
I hope the civil case ruins him until he's forced to take his chances on the street.
Eh, I'm not so sure about that. The state of Vermont loves pedophiles. In fact, several years ago one man was given 30 days rehab after he molested a little girl for over eight years. Being rich helps, but there are many liberal states who love the bullshit cop-out of "I have a disease, I'm the real victim, and I need help". It's sad, but it's true.The Rogue Wolf said:Remember, kids, the rules don't apply to you when you're rich! Let any ordinary person try to get out of a prison sentence for rape because "I wouldn't fare well in jail"- his head would still be spinning from having the book thrown at him when the cell door closed.
Oh hey, yeah, let's reward violent behavior with praise, that's a great idea. I mean, it's not like it's homicide if the victim has done something awful enough in the past...(who gets to be the arbiter on the matter of "How awful is awful enough that killing the person isn't homicide" by the way?)Stg said:Moral of the story - when the judicial system fails, there are always good people out there who do what needs to be done.