I love a "fun" (i.e. low brow) shooter. What they lack in refined aesthetics they make up for with a wild abandon approach to fun. Or rather, that's the goal. Personally, I think the best games combine that with a great story and great characters.
Bulletstorm is a kind of hyper masculine melting pot of guns, gore, and other grotesqueries that make me all kinds of happy. However, it knew what it was. It's a quick, fun shooter not looking to revolutionize so much as refine. Which, by the way, it did beautifully.
Now though, It makes me look a lot closer at Duke Nukem Forever. It's finally coming out but...I just can't care and I'm actually a little insulted. I've tried to appreciate that he's supposed to be a gaming icon but I'm in my early 20's so I just don't have that outlook. Sorry. This was almost a response to an earlier thread discussing the ESRB's MA rating for DNF, but it was a enough I wanted some other opinions.
From what that article and other information concerning the game tells me, DNF has racist, sexist, idiotic stereotype-focused humor that doesn't, like say South Park, comment on a broader topic, but is there purely for its own grossly ignorant sense-of-humor. Unlike Bulletstorm, it seems to approach it all with a straight face. It always comes across to me (and I completely understand that my take on it might be unique only to me), that DNF is getting a free ride because its just "supposed to."
The humor itself is something only a 13 or 14 year old actually finds funny without being ironic. So either the developers are intentionally targeting a younger audience (HEY, EA's got a new friend!) or they feel the gaming community is a bunch of whacked out, man-children with a need to over compensate.
To go back to Bulletstorm, BS was a game that made no excuses. It was a Friday the 13th or Nightmare on Elm Street. It could take the occasional wink to the camera to recognize its own camp while pulling off some truly great gameplay. But Duke? This is my "legendary gaming icon"? A 40 something psychopath with zero motivation beyond murder, sex and greed? A game whose originality died out a decade ago?
No. No, no, and nooooo. I do genuinely hope the game is fun and I applaud the developers efforts in bringing back a long abandoned franchise which is always risky, but I don't see a gaming icon getting his due. I see an unimaginative shooter that does nothing for the landscape of gaming in terms of gameplay or story and will succeed only on the merits of people who take it all quite seriously. It'll come, it'll go, and FOX news will make fun of me for it and threaten my rights over it till its finally forgotten.
Where do you stand? Do we really need Duke these days? Not because shooters got too smart and forgot basic fun, but because he's just not really that impressive anymore. In all honesty, it actually all seems a little pathetic.
On a final note: This is my own opinion. I am not saying I'm right and others are wrong. I just wanted to dip my toe in the water and get a feel for the Escapist communities opinion as a whole.
Bulletstorm is a kind of hyper masculine melting pot of guns, gore, and other grotesqueries that make me all kinds of happy. However, it knew what it was. It's a quick, fun shooter not looking to revolutionize so much as refine. Which, by the way, it did beautifully.
Now though, It makes me look a lot closer at Duke Nukem Forever. It's finally coming out but...I just can't care and I'm actually a little insulted. I've tried to appreciate that he's supposed to be a gaming icon but I'm in my early 20's so I just don't have that outlook. Sorry. This was almost a response to an earlier thread discussing the ESRB's MA rating for DNF, but it was a enough I wanted some other opinions.
From what that article and other information concerning the game tells me, DNF has racist, sexist, idiotic stereotype-focused humor that doesn't, like say South Park, comment on a broader topic, but is there purely for its own grossly ignorant sense-of-humor. Unlike Bulletstorm, it seems to approach it all with a straight face. It always comes across to me (and I completely understand that my take on it might be unique only to me), that DNF is getting a free ride because its just "supposed to."
The humor itself is something only a 13 or 14 year old actually finds funny without being ironic. So either the developers are intentionally targeting a younger audience (HEY, EA's got a new friend!) or they feel the gaming community is a bunch of whacked out, man-children with a need to over compensate.
To go back to Bulletstorm, BS was a game that made no excuses. It was a Friday the 13th or Nightmare on Elm Street. It could take the occasional wink to the camera to recognize its own camp while pulling off some truly great gameplay. But Duke? This is my "legendary gaming icon"? A 40 something psychopath with zero motivation beyond murder, sex and greed? A game whose originality died out a decade ago?
No. No, no, and nooooo. I do genuinely hope the game is fun and I applaud the developers efforts in bringing back a long abandoned franchise which is always risky, but I don't see a gaming icon getting his due. I see an unimaginative shooter that does nothing for the landscape of gaming in terms of gameplay or story and will succeed only on the merits of people who take it all quite seriously. It'll come, it'll go, and FOX news will make fun of me for it and threaten my rights over it till its finally forgotten.
Where do you stand? Do we really need Duke these days? Not because shooters got too smart and forgot basic fun, but because he's just not really that impressive anymore. In all honesty, it actually all seems a little pathetic.
On a final note: This is my own opinion. I am not saying I'm right and others are wrong. I just wanted to dip my toe in the water and get a feel for the Escapist communities opinion as a whole.