So he is the prime example of hypocrisy. xDmr. cool said:He used to play a lot of CS:S too. :SMechsoap said:Someone been playing too many modern fps's? If so he/she should also hate counter-strike (if he/she likes it now) because it neither got iron sight.mr. cool said:"I hate Half-Life and L4D/L4D2 (and TF2, I think.) because I couldnt use iron sights..."
Too realistic is a valid complaint in my book, can you imagine a game like CoD where you have one single life(and when you lose it you cannot play that game ever again), and when you get hurt it takes months or even years to heal?varulfic said:Also: "It's too realistic"phereck said:"Its not realistic"
My favorite part of the "because it's popular argument" is that by hating a game just because it's popular, you are still being a sheep, just following another herd.Nazulu said:That's at the top of my list as well. I mean come on, there are so many people who really behave like sheep, it's just sad. I can understand when something gets over hyped that it can be disappointing but COME ON!!! Hate!?Masterstuffing said:because it's popular.
Some of these complaints seem pretty reasonable if explained a little more.
You've missed my entire point. Pretty does not equal "good", as pretty is a subjective term. For graphics to be objectively bad, they must be (at least to some degree) ineffective, and ineffective graphics detract from gameplay, hence they are a reason to hate a game (especially if an otherwise good game is ruined by them).believer258 said:All I said was that bad graphics are a stupid reason to hate a game. A game should be able to stand up on gameplay, if nothing else. Story should also be good, but it's forgivable if gameplay is good. I never said graphics can't enhance a game, and if the graphics are so horrible you can't see shit, then yeah, they do detract from the game. I don't think that's the case very often, though.Dys said:How is bad graphics a reason for hating a game? If the graphics are objectively bad (which is different from not being photo realistic) it renders the game near unplayable, it's hugely important to be able to clearly and easily identify what's happening ingame. This whole attitude of "I hate good graphics because they detract from gameplay" is stupid, if the quality of the graphics falls low enough, the gameplay becomes very, very bad very, very quickly.believer258 said:Bad graphics
I think the "because it's on console x" or "because gaming reviews scored it poorly (or highly in some cases)" are both incomprehensibly stupid reasons to hate a game.
"I hate good graphics because they detract from gameplay"
Were you implying that I thought that? That's just crazy. I said two words: "Bad graphics". Graphics can enhance a game (see: Crysis) or bring it down; Star Wars Battlefront 2 had a horrible draw distance on PS2, and therefore lost a point in my book. It was still a good game, though, and it proves my point - games don't need mindblowing graphics to be good.
In the end, graphics fall in the same bucket as story. Story can make a game better, and it can even almost completely rely on it (see: Mass Effect), or a game with minimal story can still be good (see: Timeshift, the original Half-Life, Doom 3). Exact same argument with graphics.
Oh, yes, and ever heard of Megaman Legends? Fucking awesome game when I was a kid. It also had fucking horrible graphics, and even then I knew it did. I didn't care. It was great.
That lovely piece of blasphemy up there is courtesy of YouTube. And he's referring to the titular character of Afro. I called him out on it, and... let's just say his response damn near gave me a brain hemorrhage (then again... YouTube...).Only gay thing. and Reason i never watched this is because He's black. Wtf. Samurai is Jpn tradition. Japan is an island. Where the f this black weirdo come from?
I can't play a game if I hate the character I'm playing, it just breaks any hope of immersion completely.StraightToHeck said:Shamus Young wrote an article a few weeks ago about how he hated The Witcher solely because he hated the main character.
That's a dumb reason if ever I saw one.
It's not that you're wrong, but it's his complete refusal to even consider the idea of playing it, and passing that judgment about the game without having seen it in action.Timmaaaah said:In a certain context I agree with him. There was just so much bloody story content that I didn't really want it to be a game, I wanted it to be a novel, movie or TV series. I didn't really enjoy the game-play, but the writing was just so bloody good and I think it was made worse by the fact that it was a game... did anyone notice the way every time a character finished a sentence there was always a big pause before they started the second one? It's like they'd finished talking and then they just go talk more. There's nothing wrong with too much talking as I love storylines, but I think there wasn't really enough focus on the gameplay.Diligent said:Buddy of mine made my eye twitch with "Mass Effect just seems too story driven to be good."
No, it's still a stupid argument because obviously the player has misinterpreted the point of the game. If CoD had a system like that, than CoD would be a wholly different game, I'd imagine more stealth based or possibly psychological horror (a realistic horror game would KICK ASS, could you imagine?)... but it would still be a damn good game if the realism was implented right.Mr.K. said:Too realistic is a valid complaint in my book, can you imagine a game like CoD where you have one single life(and when you lose it you cannot play that game ever again), and when you get hurt it takes months or even years to heal?varulfic said:Also: "It's too realistic"phereck said:"Its not realistic"
Realism hasto have it's limits.