Yeah, not the route I expected them to take. Though it looks more like a mini-series before a full blown sequel, as there are only 3 episodes. Still, not sure how the gameplay is gonna work without the time powers and stuff.undeadsuitor said:Life Is Strange 2: Origin of Chloe
cause that's what we really needed
I just check this thread and other parts of the internet occasionally for the highlights. I can't stand just watching the full events.Marik2 said:It feels like not many people are watching E3
Unless they introduce somekind of time mechanic to change shit and cause paradoxes or something, yeah what's the point? We know her dad dies, we know what happens to Rachel, and we know how Chloe is going to end up by the end.undeadsuitor said:Life Is Strange 2: Origin of Chloe
cause that's what we really needed
That would still suck and make the whole game experience meaningless. Give the ability to write the whole Max story out of existence, then you'd have something interesting. Like what if you were allowed to alter shit in this prequel based on your knowledge and experience from the first game? Remember that one bit in LiS (the best bit) where...undeadsuitor said:the only hope for it is if all those red herring/fan theories about Rachel having time powers like Max are true. and maybe we get to see what someone fucking with the timeline looks like from a third person perspective, and somehow Rachel erases her memories by the end
or something
So basically glorified fanfiction.but its probably just gonna be chloe screaming for a couple of hours as her life falls apart
I feel everyone is being to harsh on the new AC or the franchise in general because with the exception of AC Unity they clearly put effort in the games.Casual Shinji said:Unless they introduce somekind of time mechanic to change shit and cause paradoxes or something, yeah what's the point? We know her dad dies, we know what happens to Rachel, and we know how Chloe is going to end up by the end.undeadsuitor said:Life Is Strange 2: Origin of Chloe
cause that's what we really needed
OT: The only thing that got my pulse to rise a bit was The Last Night. That looked cool. Everything else was bland is fuck. That new Assassin's Creed looked so generic it gave me a migraine.
Either something actually different or just for it to go away. Cuz guess what this new Assassin's Creed looks like... more Assassin's Creed. Which is exactly what people got tired of and why Ubisoft supposedly gave the series a year off. But as it stands Ubisoft can't break out of their design philosophy of making every new game just a slightly different combination of the same tired open-world game mechanics.Samtemdo8 said:I feel everyone is being to harsh on the new AC or the franchise in general because with the exception of AC Unity they clearly put effort in the games.
I mean what more could you possibly want out of the franchise?
We went from Medieval Europe, to Pirates, to Victorian England, to Ancient Egypt.Casual Shinji said:Either something actually different or just for it to go away. Cuz guess what this new Assassin's Creed looks like... more Assassin's Creed. Which is exactly what people got tired of and why Ubisoft supposedly gave the series a year off. But as it stands Ubisoft can't break out of their design philosophy of making every new game just a slightly different combination of the same tired open-world game mechanics.Samtemdo8 said:I feel everyone is being to harsh on the new AC or the franchise in general because with the exception of AC Unity they clearly put effort in the games.
I mean what more could you possibly want out of the franchise?
I was dry-heaving throughout that entire trailer. I longer even have the stomach content to vommit up anything substantial at the thought of a new shitty Ubisoft game.