Boy are you in for a kick in the nuts.Froggyman1000 said:I would love to see something on Diablo 3. I'm itching for a good hack and slash MMORPG so badly it's not even funny, and I cannot play D2 anymore. I've played the crud out of it, and now I really just need Diablo 3 to come out. =P I don't think they'd give a release date just yet, but maybe they'll inch one step closer with the fourth class, or something like that. Would be nice.
I'd also like to see some new info on Duke Nukem Forever, but I'm not holding my breath on that one. I'm not really too excited about anything else at the moment.
Heavy Rain is a QTE game in a very simple way to describe the game.GonzoGamer said:Worthy mentions yes but notice that it was all so far in the future that even THAT stuff hasn't hit yet. I remember the GoW 3 thing being quite spartan-please forgive.Indigo_Dingo said:Sony's wasn't that bad. Some very cool concepts, footage of both inFAMOUS and Heavy Rain in action, and confirmation of God Of War III.GonzoGamer said:I'm just hoping the big 3 don't fail as badly as they did last year. That was just sad, all around.
At least most of the crap ms & N peddled (it all sort of blurred together into one casual mess) has been released and forgotten.
Still can't get excited about Heavy Rain-every clip I've seen (admittedly not many) has involved a QTE.
TaborMallory said:I would enjoy more news and Battle Reports on Starcraft II.
Particularly, more news about why they're splitting up the campaigns...
Dude, splitting the campaigns was probably a good idea. Imagine how long it took them just to get their entire system to balance well, let alone work a campaign around that. From what they've already said, the campaign for each race will be rather long.TaborMallory said:I would enjoy more news and Battle Reports on Starcraft II.
Particularly, more news about why they're splitting up the campaigns...
Bayonetta looks so stupidly fun.Sensenmann said:Borderlands
Bayonetta
Bioshock 2
No more casual gaming crap. Or at least good games which have genre classification but blur the lines of casual/hardcore.
Okay so maybe sony's wasn't THAT bad but I still hope they have more for us this year. I want to see some Agency, plans for home, y'know some of the potential they sold the ps3 on.Indigo_Dingo said:They also showed off some Resistance 2 and some LittleBigPlanet.GonzoGamer said:Worthy mentions yes but notice that it was all so far in the future that even THAT stuff hasn't hit yet. I remember the GoW 3 thing being quite spartan-please forgive.Indigo_Dingo said:Sony's wasn't that bad. Some very cool concepts, footage of both inFAMOUS and Heavy Rain in action, and confirmation of God Of War III.GonzoGamer said:I'm just hoping the big 3 don't fail as badly as they did last year. That was just sad, all around.
There is nothing more to know why they're splitting up the campaigns of starcraft 2. If they'd put all of them in 1, they would have to reduce their lengh greatly to have a reasonable release date, and that wouldn't be good. So instead they split it up to get one awesome campaign at a time.TaborMallory said:I would enjoy more news and Battle Reports on Starcraft II.
Particularly, more news about why they're splitting up the campaigns...
iamq said:There is nothing more to know why they're splitting up the campaigns of starcraft 2. If they'd put all of them in 1, they would have to reduce their lengh greatly to have a reasonable release date, and that wouldn't be good. So instead they split it up to get one awesome campaign at a time.
I guess what I want to know is whether or not the campaign split is going to hit my wallet harder than it should.RapidCrash said:Dude, splitting the campaigns was probably a good idea. Imagine how long it took them just to get their entire system to balance well, let alone work a campaign around that. From what they've already said, the campaign for each race will be rather long.
God I hope not. If they do what they did with WoW, then we're screwed. Even if both expansions were $20, $100 total for a single game still seems a bit steep for me (factoring in the $60 initial).TaborMallory said:iamq said:There is nothing more to know why they're splitting up the campaigns of starcraft 2. If they'd put all of them in 1, they would have to reduce their lengh greatly to have a reasonable release date, and that wouldn't be good. So instead they split it up to get one awesome campaign at a time.I guess what I want to know is whether or not the campaign split is going to hit my wallet harder than it should.RapidCrash said:Dude, splitting the campaigns was probably a good idea. Imagine how long it took them just to get their entire system to balance well, let alone work a campaign around that. From what they've already said, the campaign for each race will be rather long.
3 games, 3 Years, 3 Christmas releases at year 4 release the Battlechest with all 3 games, year 5 an expansion pack.TaborMallory said:iamq said:There is nothing more to know why they're splitting up the campaigns of starcraft 2. If they'd put all of them in 1, they would have to reduce their lengh greatly to have a reasonable release date, and that wouldn't be good. So instead they split it up to get one awesome campaign at a time.I guess what I want to know is whether or not the campaign split is going to hit my wallet harder than it should.RapidCrash said:Dude, splitting the campaigns was probably a good idea. Imagine how long it took them just to get their entire system to balance well, let alone work a campaign around that. From what they've already said, the campaign for each race will be rather long.