This kind of apathy is exactly why they are allowed to do this. If your reason for not doing so is simply "no one will care" then you've doomed any chance of change to failure.
How many people are on the Escapist forums? Or any gaming forums at all? Games, especially those made by EA, are mainstream, and millions of people buy them. Even if everyone here boycotted them for the rest of eternity, EA would hardly notice.Valdus said:This is the attitude I meant. If everyone who thought like this actually tried the boycott instead it might actually hurt.LT Cannibal 68 said:oooooooooooooooh one less sale from a faceless poster on a message board, that'll learn em.
i can respect your passion but ea will react the same way a giant does when i hit him with an iron dagger when i'm level 1.
Vuliev said:Because to reconcile your analogy with his...actually, no, your analogy is poor. A game is, and should always be, permanent merchandise, regardless of whether it's digital or not. You buy a game, a toaster, a TV, etc., you as a consumer should have a reasonable expectation of being able to keep that item until you can literally no longer use it. Now, when it comes to online gaming, things are considerably shadier. Personally, I have no problem if a person gets banned from a multiplayer game or its forums (so long as they actually deserved it), but when you are banned from using the single-player aspect of your property, that's taking it too far.
That's where we can reconcile your analogy: a bar is akin to the multiplayer aspect of a game, and likewise akin to online forums. If you misbehave and disturb the other patrons, you can be asked or forced to leave without recompense; you can not, however, lose your ability to consume alcohol in the comfort of your own home. And before you say "well probation yada yada yada," that requires a serious altercation in which you were arrested--the only possible online equivalent is actively hacking other forum/gamegoers, i.e. an act which is punished under Federal law. Going into a bar to drink is a privilege bestowed by the establishment (the multiplayer/forum aspet); the ability to drink in your home THAT YOU OWN is a right, along with owning the house (the right to own and use single-player games you've purchased.)
You must hang around in posher bars than I did in my youth. Many a time I've been searched on the way into bars and clubs as a precondition of entry. I have even been thrown out of few and you know what, it was NEVER my fault. No one is ever the villain their own story.malmodir said:Actually it would be more like going to a bar, ordering a beer with the consequence of giving the barman the keys to your apartment and allowing him to rifle through your stuff. Just to get kicked out of the bar if some other guy insults the barman while yelling your name.
No I don't think so. He's got some great points, things I agree with.Uzi-Bazooka said:I'm gonna get a lot of hate for this, but...http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/jimquisition/3857-BOYCOTT
Um, I'm looking at my copy of Saints Row 3 right now and it says that THQ is the publisher... I think it's great that you actually write a company and voice your concerns, but this is a major blunder and, honestly, one you shouldn't have made. Otherwise, I support you, but EA might not take you seriously after this.dubious_wolf said:I love the Mass Effect series, Saint's Row and I have fond memories of the Sims 2 & 3 from my childhood.
And if that was the only way you could get banned, that might be a good idea.Sober Thal said:I will continue to buy EA games new, and I will continue not to troll them, so I won't get banned. I encourage everyone else not to troll as well.
Well spoken sir.Ridgemo said:EA has never done anything to annoy or upset me. Yeah, sucks for these people, but then i don't care about them.
I will keep buying games that i will enjoy, regardless of who made/published them.