As unpopular as this may be, but the guy does actually have a good point that he's making. Having some of the newly made content on disk in order to keep download sizes down, or to help integrate new content into the gamer easier is -not- a bad thing, and no doubt people would jump on the hate train if a news outlet spun that in a negative light.
Thing is, there are many examples of studios withholding content that was on disk that should have been a part of the base game. The game should either have been delayed, or the dlc should have been included as a 'free content!' buzzword mubo jumbo in order to make the devs seem light generous saints.
Mass Effect 3 is one example of this. Jarvik had so many -critical- interactions throughout the game that added a lot of context, and that was almost entirely on disk.
Capcom's done this many times too, though they were pretty shameless about it. Including full characters on disk that could be played without hassle before the dlc was released? Yeah, thats pretty shitty.
Once again, both sides are missing eachothers points because no one in this world really seems to communicate properly. Peter More needs to take the complaints critically and look for what they're stemming from, while gamers (as a whole) need to not blindly hate something without taking a step back and reading whats actually being said.