^ LOL =D fully agree with this. I'm willing to accept a certain level of this from valve, because they aren't dickheads. EA however, don't have anywhere NEAR the same level of gamer goodwill, and as such, can't even dream of being able to get away with this.Raiyan 1.0 said:Germans fight against EA's Fourth Reich.
In reality though, you have to agree to every bit of data you upload and they tell you exactly what they do.A Pious Cultist said:That simply isn't true:TestECull said:Then why does it look for data that isn't required to run the game?
Steam does none of this. The closest it comes is the hardware survey, which is opt-in, and only collects data relavent to running games. Things like screen resolution, hardware configuration, windows version, driver versions. It doesn't care what sort of programs are run in the background, and Valve doesn't sell that data to anybody.
http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey
Steam looks for what programs you have too. The problem is that Origin's algorithm just indescriminately scans files when it really shouldnt.
By creating a virtual machine you can do exactly that, which is something I plan to do for Mass Effect 3, my brother in-law is a professional computer programmer who is also looking forward to ME3 but Not Origin, so we are going to setup VM's to block EA's illegal spying.Spy_Guy said:A friend of mine told me about a person who created software to monitor Origin's activities.
He was a bit dissatisfied when he found it going through his declarations, understandably enough.
If I was a better programmer, I'd think of a way to conceal that data from Origin.
Possibly by a virtual PC setup, which would be allowed to access the system resources needed to run smoothly... but one that'd be completely empty.
I'm most likely talking crap, though =3
I have no idea whether or not that'd be doable.
I think this sums it up. People are acting like EA is being a sinister figure here, when instead they are more just behaving like beginners to the big world of the digital marketplace, which they are. This is why I don't plan to have any dealings with Origin until it has finished teething.Awexsome said:I don't get the whole outrage... are people worried that EA is secretly pilfering people's credit card numbers and selling them on 4chan to the highest bidder?
I know we enjoy the whole, "fuck the man" mindset around this site but enough with the conspiracy theories guys. Just exactly what malicious things do people think EA is trying to pull that is worth this much rage?
Ask yourself, would a sentient program find your wife hot? Watch Saturn 3 [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079285/] and you may have found the answer.Hank Wants Pie said:Origin is keeping track of my data on my computer?!
Wait a minute...
Is it going to develop sentient behavior?
Is it soon going to start craving for freedom outside the bonds of my hard disk?
...
Is it going to impregnate my wife?
Thanks for the clarification, and thanks for looking into it.Frehls said:Steam's privacy policy is essentially the same as EA's. The hardware survey is optional, the rest of the stuff in the privacy policy is not. Neither EULA says that they have access to all of your personal information. Origin's specifically states:
The non-personally identifiable information that EA collects includes technical and related information that identifies your computer(including the Internet Protocol Address) and operating system, as well as information about your Application usage (including but not limited to successful installation and/or removal), software, software usage and peripheral hardware.
Just like Steam's, it is non-personally identifiable information.
Anyway, I know exactly what EA is taking from my computer. Nothing. See my post above.
You can't disprove it 100% by the logic of reasonable doubt (unless you break into the client program of course), however, you can observe and measure the program's behavior while it's in operation, and you can do so without cracking one bit of data (to avoid violating copyright if that isn't your bag).Femaref said:You can't really prove the absence of something in a software, especially closed source ones. EA can say all the want, it is no proof. Also, even if origin were open source, you could only trust it if you read, understand and compile the source yourself, which nobody would do.
Torrasque said:Two things caught my eye with this articleHe should've put Fuhrer.Hevva said:The furore began a few days ago...Hehe, "furore"
I never had interest in the BF series anyway so I'm not really missing out.
I'd love to read them, but when they're 50 pages long (or simply feel that way, especially in the ones where you have to scroll down to the bottom before agreeing) and written in stuffy legal terms that don't make a damn bit of sense to your average Joe, how can we be expected to read them? You can either spend 10 minutes minimum trying to read it only to not understand it and then click "agree" without knowing what it says, or you can spend 5 seconds to click "agree" without knowing what it says. The end result of both is the same: you have no idea what you just agreed to. One option gets you using the software a hell of a lot quicker than the other though, so who can really blame anyone for picking that option?Torrasque said:I know none of us read the terms and conditions to any of the games we play, but because someone actually DID read the Origins EULA, we are having this discussion.
Its stupid to highlight any part of the EULA, people should just learn to read them instead of clicking and agreeing blindly (don't worry, I do it too)
Micalas said:http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2009/8/17/128949932232416520.jpgTorrasque said:Two things caught my eye with this articleHe should've put Fuhrer.Hevva said:The furore began a few days ago...Hehe, "furore"
I never had interest in the BF series anyway so I'm not really missing out.
Made even more hilarious by the fact that this happened in Germany.
Also, I played BF3 today (older bro brought it over) and even he said it sucks.
The vehicles are fun to use, but explosions in the game have a lethal radius of about 1 foot, missile lock doesn't mean a damn thing, and snipers don't always kill on the first shot in the head. Oh, and there's the whole EVERY SINGLE PERSON IS A BULLET SPONGE thing.
But I'll complain about BF3 sucking in a different thread.
Oh I know, I am the same way, "Read these 20 pages of boring things I don't care about? Fuck that". I was merely mocking the concept of highlighting certain parts of the terms and conditions, and the fact that we SHOULD read the terms and conditions.mjc0961 said:Go get 'em, Germany. Destroy EA.
I'd love to read them, but when they're 50 pages long (or simply feel that way, especially in the ones where you have to scroll down to the bottom before agreeing) and written in stuffy legal terms that don't make a damn bit of sense to your average Joe, how can we be expected to read them? You can either spend 10 minutes minimum trying to read it only to not understand it and then click "agree" without knowing what it says, or you can spend 5 seconds to click "agree" without knowing what it says. The end result of both is the same: you have no idea what you just agreed to. One option gets you using the software a hell of a lot quicker than the other though, so who can really blame anyone for picking that option?Torrasque said:I know none of us read the terms and conditions to any of the games we play, but because someone actually DID read the Origins EULA, we are having this discussion.
Its stupid to highlight any part of the EULA, people should just learn to read them instead of clicking and agreeing blindly (don't worry, I do it too)