The sad part: I'll never get to try this out because of HD spiders. Whatever happened to good old spider-less Morrowind and mostly spider-less Oblivion?
This is what I'm worried about too. It isn't a big problem for pve as far as I've seen, but pvp is an entirely different beast. The singleplayer combat mechanics never seems like it will work well for pvp. Only way we'll ever find out is when we get our hands on the game.Newtonyd said:At this point, it sounds very much like Guild Wars 2, with its exploration-related quests, playstyles, zones devoted to PVP, shared PVP/PVE gear, etc. So I have to ask the critical question:
How is the combat?
If the combat is mediocre, it will make or break the game. Why should I play ESO over Guild Wars 2?
Exactly. I've maxed 4 characters so far, and took my time enjoying the ride. It was awesome having an MMO fully voiced by the likes of David Hayter, Jennifer Hale, and Steve Blum, among many other greats. The problem was, all the MMO vets coming in and spacebar-ing through all that voice acting and story and just blitzing the endgame content, which wasn't really there at launch. Once the expansion dropped, I had a hell of a lot of fun re-visiting my lvl 50 characters I hadn't run in a while and going to Makeb, which was outstanding.KaZuYa said:ToR was a brilliant and ground breaking MMO but as every MMO is ruined by people racing to max level and skipping 90% of the content which has taken 3 years to make and then say it lacks content and it sucks.
Bethesda has nothing to do with the development of the MMO, nor will the MMO affect the development of future TES games.freedash22 said:I think Bethesda could have done better by just committing all their resources towards making the next TES (Single Player) or Fallout game even better. That investment would go a longer way to build goodwill among hardcore and casual fans as well as making a much better game.
Then this is good news. It is reassuring to know they are possibly focusing on what they do best. Thanks for making this one clear.SajuukKhar said:Bethesda has nothing to do with the development of the MMO, nor will the MMO affect the development of future TES games.freedash22 said:I think Bethesda could have done better by just committing all their resources towards making the next TES (Single Player) or Fallout game even better. That investment would go a longer way to build goodwill among hardcore and casual fans as well as making a much better game.
Bethesda didn't use any of their resources on TESO.
http://www.oxm.co.uk/56352/bethesda-teases-really-awesome-project-from-elder-scrolls-team-100-unrelated-to-mmo/freedash22 said:Then this is good news. It is reassuring to know they are possibly focusing on what they do best. Thanks for making this one clear.
Just in case you wanted some sauce for reassurance of the claims I made.Hines, vice president at Bethesda Softworks, was answering our questions about Elder Scrolls Online on Xbox One - screenshots here - when we asked if work on it would hold up the next single player RPG (which, yes, we are hurting for pretty bad).
"Zenimax Online Studio is an MMO shop," said Hines. "They're making an Elder Scrolls MMO and that is 100 per cent unrelated to... Todd Howard, at this point, has earned the right to do what the hell he wants; nobody gets to tell him different and nobody gets to dictate to him what he gets to do.
"You're laughing because you know it's true," he continued. "Do you think that even I would go to Todd and say 'listen, I know you want to do this, but these other guys...?' He gets to do whatever he wants. Him and his team are moving forward with the stuff that they want to work on and where they want to go next in making games."
That is why the MMO is being turned in awful Cash cow F2P models because people like yourself are focused on the mythical end game content so putting any effort at all into mid game content is pointless. I'm a hardcore raider from the old days but I think raid content has no place whatsoever in MMO's, it's utter pointless and that's one of the main reasons ToR got slated due to lack of. Also FYI World of Warcraft is not a good game, its probably one of the worst stains on MMO history because it was first MMO to pander to wider audience, dumbing down to so it ticked the boxes and then it actually went and became successful and which basically meant if you want funding for a big MMO you have to say it's gonna be like WoW but better or you don't get the cash, there is a list as long as my arm of great MMO's which have failed because of spacebar smashers and greedy exec's who sell their stock on WoW numbers not reality and it gets cannned.cursedseishi said:Groundbreaking and brilliant how exactly?KaZuYa said:ToR was a brilliant and ground breaking MMO but as every MMO is ruined by people racing to max level and skipping 90% of the content which has taken 3 years to make and then say it lacks content and it sucks.
Brilliant in the outrageous amount of time they spent hyping up voice acting?
Groundbreaking in their inability to actually deliver content in the game to even help differentiate the leveling path a little from the strict, boring dull line of planets that Champions Online suffered as well? Failing that, the inability to actually expand the end-game content in some reasonable bit of time, instead choosing to bloat out the mid-game without actually adding to it?
Or, amazing in the utterly pathetic amount of customization offered for the characters themselves, seeing as most all NPCs and all Player Characters come from the same generic 3-body shapes, same-between-all parts design that even older games can best.
Please, TOR is far from groundbreaking or brilliant. It came from a bunch of inexperienced devs with not a single clue as to what to do between them, despite having the advantage of being in a time where "the do's and do nots" of MMOs are out there in plain sight. An advantage, mind you, that World of Warcraft (which they were oft desperate to emulate) didn't have. It's a good game, but not great. And it only gets worse, as they add in cash-shop specific rep grinds to pay for, amongst the other ridiculous cash shop lock-offs.
And, just a correction here, Classes do have an effect. They determine what skills you'll gain, outside of the other sources. So while a Mage and a Fighter could both equip staffs, and cast some spells, ultimately the Mage will always be better with casting spells and using staffs.
I dont get this post I honestly don'tKaZuYa said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HRnc8DNdRA 0_oNewtonyd said:At this point, it sounds very much like Guild Wars 2, with its exploration-related quests, playstyles, zones devoted to PVP, shared PVP/PVE gear, etc. So I have to ask the critical question:
How is the combat?
If the combat is mediocre, it will make or break the game. Why should I play ESO over Guild Wars 2?