Then why are you trusting it now? You said before that you don't trust the word of non-party-affiliated electoral officials, because you believe they have reason to lie. What changed?
Well there we go then, case closed. The way to ensure the integrity of an electoral contest is to place it under the protection of an armed force under the ultimate command of one of the candidates in that election. Makes perfect sense.
Yeah but I'm guessing you don't have experience with armed authority assaulting and possibly murdering you.
You also don't pre-determine something, and then deliberately only look for evidence which fits, make any evidence found fit, or only accept evidence found which fits, this pre-determination.
Pretty much
Probably because they'd just end up like these gangs
en.wikipedia.org
The police can be pretty good at that when they really take against a suspect and want to fit them up.
To ensure democratic standards, we need to push for a military junta takeover... I mean, what?
A toaster?! That thing runs on electricity and can burn bread! I wouldn't trust conservatives with a glass of water!
This honestly isn't meant as an insult:
doesn't understand how it's possible for people to dislike trump. He is incapable of understanding that there are people who don't think like him.
I was going to take this to absurd lenghts by saying something like "I wouldn't trust conservatives to breathe responsibly". But thing being what they are, perhaps not so absurd.
Oh no, existing as responsible humans is something conservatives gave up a long long long time ago. That's why they're conservative and at best think things should stay the same, if not go back to the way they used to be. Can you imagine the disfunction required to think the past is something to admire?
This is a forensic investigation carried out by someone who isn't an election official.
Confusing "the police" with "the army" is one's personal error. Nobody has experience being mistreated by the army.
Missing the point and also incredibly wrong. "Nobody has experience being mistreated by the army" might be the most stupid thing you've said this year but you have a few hours yet.
One of your more...special statements:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Seriously what world are you from? No Americans have experienced being mistreated by the army?! Are you simply not counting the actual Americans who make up the army?
www.nbcdfw.com
Because the US Military is not on active, armed duty in American towns and cities. Which you're suggesting we change.
That's a fair enough distinction.
