No. YOUR claim was that they have no argument.
No I claimed they weren't addressing her actual points just throwing the term TERF about as a weighted term to shortcut actually addressing point which is part of a larger symptom going on where rather than address actual points people are throwing terms round to try and get negative labels to stick to people which in turn causes knee jerk reactions against them as intended. Additionally that this isn't good because the overuse and stretching of terms is destroying the power they have and making it ultimate far harder to really consider them anything more than an angry person calling some-one a doo doo head.
You showed absolutely nothing. Why do I have to do your work for you? I showed you a BUNCH of people who had points. Do I literally have to show every person in this world's point of view before your satisfied? Because, I'm going to say this again, that's your job. Go talk to people instead of lying about their positions.
I showed people simply throwing the term Terf at her not talking about actual points she raised. You are now claiming said people have actually had complex deep talks about what J.K. Rowling is saying but also claiming I have to find the evidence. The Burden of proof for your claims is on you not me.
Your argument is I have to prove they never talked about J.K. Rowling's actual positions. Yet there is no evidence they ever did presented by you to support they ever did the thing.
What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Your move.
You showed some people talked about J.K. Rowlings actual position. NOT the same people I showed saying J.K. Rowling is a terf. So can I show progressives believing all kinds of nonsense and promoting it on youtube and claim all the left are loony new age spirituality worshippers? No you'd likely call me out if I claimed such nonsense when evidence shows a large number of left wing people debunking that too. In this case my evidence for people just throwing out the claim of her being a TERF far outweighs yours of people addressing her points.
Here look, I start you off.
Is there anyone here on this forum who thinks Rowling is (or even partially) a TERF that would like to express their reasoning?
Note they'd also have to argue how J.K. Rowling despite her own claims hates all Trans women and wants to exclude them entirely.