Electronic Brain Link Lets Rats Send Each Other Thoughts

Pinkamena

Stuck in a vortex of sexy horses
Jun 27, 2011
2,371
0
0
tangoprime said:
What if those 5 kilo rats plaguing Tehran get a hold of this technology?
Heh, I was going to mention the same thing. I can imagine this technology could be used to make a private rat army.
 
Jan 9, 2012
31
0
0
this is the plot of a fair few post-apocalypse pieces of media (www.romanticallyapocalyptic.com) just saying. though I am sure it would have it's uses, I wouldn't connect to a network with it. I just know someone would put pornography over my vision or something like that.
 

Generic4me

New member
Oct 10, 2012
116
0
0
This was in RATS. Not humans. Temper your expectations a little.

I understand it's an awesome idea, and all the things you could do with it, but also understand that a Rat and a human are two very different things. Whether or not it can even work, what unintended consequences it will almost undoubtedly have, how insanely expensive it'll be to research, and the very good possibility that the only thought we will be able to transfer is "EAT POTATO". Never mind trying to send thoughts cross-species, or if the human brain even processes thoughts the same way as Rats.

I'd be surprised if we've done anything with this in 100 years.

*Side note, How exactly are these scientists getting funding for these kind of projects? Do we just hand out free money to any idiot that says "Hey let's stick a wire in two rat brains and see what happens"?
 

Deryl Owens

New member
Jun 20, 2012
10
0
0
The worst case scenario always starts off innocent just like this did: Seeing what's possible and learning things. When this becomes sufficiently advanced, abuse will be a reality in the form of forcing people to agree with your politics. Do you want to take the chance that this is going to be your opponents? The only way to safely ensure this technology is not abused is to use it to prevent people from abusing it. You might think I'm putting the horse way ahead of the cart here but what if I'm right? You wouldnt want your opponents using this to take your free will and thats why its just as wrong if you want to use it against them. It only makes sense to have this conversation now so noone can use ambiguity to legalise slavery.
 

Callate

New member
Dec 5, 2008
5,118
0
0
Simply put:

"You wouldn't be concerned about a neural uplink unless you had something to hide, Mr. Johnson."
 

Atrocious Joystick

New member
May 5, 2011
293
0
0
Whatever technology comes from this could be the most awesome teaching tool ever. Imagine a world were everybody knows everything. Schools could be put out of use and the unemployment problem would be solved forever.
 

Plasmadamage

New member
Jul 24, 2012
125
0
0
doggie015 said:
bladester1 said:
Adapting this to humans would be suuuch a grea idea, rolls eyes. All you need is one hacker to fuck people up...
All it takes is one rouge mind and...


People can turn you quite literally into a human proxy... If it goes to humans I am NEVER getting this augmentation without assurances that it cannot act as an implanted hack-wire
Direct intervention is nesicary

But seriously, this is slightly frightening
 

deadpoolhulk

New member
Dec 22, 2010
49
0
0
Callate said:
Simply put:

"You wouldn't be concerned about a neural uplink unless you had something to hide, Mr. Johnson."
no. i'm concerned about such a thing because why should i trust the people who build the tech, put it in my brain, and run it? think about the Internet, and how occasionally things go wrong. do you want that to be your brain?

but i agree, rats don't mean humans. this is so far from the point of humans it isn't worth worrying about.

feel bad for the rats though. its a little sick to do that to living things.
 

crimson sickle2

New member
Sep 30, 2009
568
0
0
Sounds cool, but which part of the brain are they sending the signals from/into? I need to know whether I should grab my tinfoil hat now, or if the link just allows a share in ideas.
 

lokicdn

New member
Sep 10, 2010
46
0
0
Hevva said:
"[It] takes about 45 days of training an hour a day [to get the experiment to work]," said Professor Miguel Nicolelis, who led the team behind the brain-cable. "There is a moment in time when... it clicks. Suddenly the [decoder] animal realizes: 'Oops! The solution is in my head. It's coming to me' and he gets it right."
No one finds this part a little sketchy?