BeanDelphiki said:
No I have never felt ashamed or embarrassed, and nobody has ever made me feel that way. In the UK (where I live) and in my generation(I'm 24) people from all walks of life, all ages, genders, social classes etc play games, whether it's just FIFA and a couple of fighting games, to full blown rpg/rts nuts. You may get ridiculed at school if you are a geek, but not for being a gamer.
If anyone here honestly gets embarrassment or ridicule for being a gamer, I feel for them. Maybe some of the older people on here experience that, but no one my age.
Further thoughts/observations I've made:
- I'm not entirely sure if my reaction was just to the idea of being a gamer, or more specifically to the idea of being an obsessive gamer (for choosing the topic), i.e. am I embarrassed by the label in general, or am I specifically embarrassed by the idea that I've been seen as fitting a social stereotype about gamers...or both?
- I recall now that when I first discussed this topic with my instructor, I opened the conversation with, "I'm not a gamer myself, but I'm interested in gaming culture..." Again, I'm not certain if this reflected some subconscious embarrassment over being identified as a gamer, or just wanting to deflect any assumptions that my interest was immaturely personal and not of serious academic interest. (Or is that again concerns about appearing to fit an ugly stereotype, i.e. the idea of gaming as a frivolous and immature interest?)
- I think if I'd been mistaken for a gamer in a community of other non-specific "geeks," I would not feel the same way even if they were not gamers themselves. I think I might be embarrassed to be presented as having knowledge or a skill set I don't think I have (i.e. "Oh, no, I'm not an expert on Battlestar Galactica, I've only seen a few episodes") so I think the embarrassment is only limited to people I would assume to have little knowledge or acceptance of gaming - not just non-gamers in general.
1)Your reaction is to the laugh. Simple. You are trying to pick out why you are embarrassed, when the answer is clear. People laugh at you, you get embarrassed. If you are wondering why you were laughed at, it's because many people in higher education want to tackle bigger subjects, like discrimination and suchlike.
2)Are you sure that's not just honesty? Also, distancing yourself from the actual subject matter is what academics do. You get very twisted results when the researcher has a large emotional investment in the outcome.
3)That's possible. I mean, throw it to the other massive geek community, the sports community (they ARE geeks, even if they don't embrace the name itself). If someone who maybe only casually supported a sports team was introduced, or considered by a group of people, to be an expert or fanatic of the team, or even sport, that they only had a limited invested interest in, they wouldn't be comfortable with that assumption.
In the long run, you represent the majority of gamers. People who use games as a source of entertainment, casually and as fits in with their lives. "Hardcore gamers" are far rarer, and most people wouldn't recognise them as such on sight. If they did recognise them as something, it would almost certainly be for some other aspect to their personality that is almost synonymous with being a gamer (eg being a comics geek, or fanboy). It's possibel the group laughed as the perception of gamers is not only relatively obvious, or almost non existent.