You do realize that a PC does more than play games right?Psychotic-ishSOB said:And you'll get six, seven, or even eight years out of your console. This generations started in 2006, won't end until 2013-2014.
You do realize that a PC does more than play games right?Psychotic-ishSOB said:And you'll get six, seven, or even eight years out of your console. This generations started in 2006, won't end until 2013-2014.
There's another side to that, and Waaghpowa actually said it.Psychotic-ishSOB said:And you'll get six, seven, or even eight years out of your console. This generations started in 2006, won't end until 2013-2014.JeanLuc761 said:Not completely accurate. It's been 3 years since my last upgrade and it was 5 years before that. My last upgrade was because my PC was far below the current generation, and my next upgrade will be when the same thing happens to the next generation.Psychotic-ishSOB said:Ironically, your PC has an even shorter lifespan than a console, because you have to keep buying shit for it.
If you build your PC properly, it is perfectly feasible to get a good 3-6 years between upgrades, depending on how much you're able to spend and how up to date you want to be.
What a lot of people seem to be forgetting is that the graphics aren't the only thing that needs improving. More CPU power and RAM will allow for more complex AI, puzzles and gameplay mechanics. In addition to this, it will aid smaller developers because they're allowed to be.. for lack of a better term, lazier. The more power there is in your system, the less optimisation there needs to be in your code, so the less work you need to do, making it easier to make games.Nicolaus99 said:That's very flashy and all but utilizing all that power will just mean mulitiplying the already staggering cost of AAA development.
The power isn't worth much these days because Gameplay > Graphics. Really, why pour a fortune into super fancy AAA production? Look at some of the most powerful competition out there... Minecraft? Angry Birds? Whateverville? World of Warcraft? WoW's the fanciest but no one's gonna accuse it of being a graphical powerhouse, never mind that its getting pretty long in the fang.
Games don't need better graphics (which would still be shiny, but secondary), they need better game design.
What? Create product demand through the release of actual quality products? THAT'S CRAZYTALK.ph0b0s123 said:Here's a thought Epic. If there is already a platform out there with the hardware you want why not use it to make some compelling games. Some games so compelling that console owners will be clamouring for next gen consoles to be capable of playing it.
yes ive heard of them, yeah they ***** alot, but the excuses epic comes up with is total bs....Dr. McD said:snip...mxfox408 said:-snip-