Blank? BLANK! You're not seeing the big picture!Rasputin1 said:It might seem that way, but if you get a chance you should check it out on Wikipedia. It's really kind of interesting.
Who you callin' a chump, chump?Pinkamena said:The covariance of a series of joint gaussian stochastic distribution is the mean of the covariances of the distributions
The answer is yes. I shot JFK while wearing a thong.TakerFoxx said:I have so many questions right now.
Jokes on you, I rather wear a dressFijiman said:This thread needs more pants. PANTS FOR EVERYONE BUT THE GUY BELOW ME!
And the jokes back on you because [insert really stupid reason here].Poetic Nova said:Jokes on you, I rather wear a dressFijiman said:This thread needs more pants. PANTS FOR EVERYONE BUT THE GUY BELOW ME!
The relevant documentation is all there, I can assure you. But don't take it from me, just listen to all these testimonies.Gorrath said:I don't think that's true at all. Here are links to several studies with quotes of the relevant parts. If it is as you say it is, then why don't we see the corresponding variance in the numbers?
Blank? BLANK! You're not seeing the big picture!Rasputin1 said:It might seem that way, but if you get a chance you should check it out on Wikipedia. It's really kind of interesting.