This this this!!!Raiyan 1.0 said:Rand is pathetic.
Now bring me a movie about Nietzsche's Übermensch - and make the God-killing part literal!
Closest so far:
This this this!!!Raiyan 1.0 said:Rand is pathetic.
Now bring me a movie about Nietzsche's Übermensch - and make the God-killing part literal!
While the movie is being sold as "the movie liberal Hollywood didn't want you to see", it had a long development life at Lion's Gate with Angelina Jolie attached to the lead. The primary backer, and owner of the rights, wanted a more "faithful" adaptation and held out until turnaround to self-finance this movie.Lex Darko said:I'm not surprised that The Fountainhead (1949) was a better movie. That's mostly because Rand wrote the screenplay herself.
Maybe this move will inspire someone to make a reboot with a better screenplay and a more well known cast.
In fairness to the work, that's sort of the point to the character - there's no actual "uprising" by the working/poverty class in Atlas Shrugged's vision of an economic-collapse. All the bad is done by 2nd and 3rd generation heirs and trust-fund babies like Dagny's brother, the idea being that they've never had to work for what they have and thus don't understand that their well-meaning altruism isn't going to work out for people long-term.Redem said:Anyone find kinda strange Ayn Rand would pick a heiress as main protagonist?
I mean the very mechanic of inheritance kinda throw a big wrench in her obsession with self-made man?
Power, wealth, influence and title can all be given to someone through the wealth of someone else solely because that person died (apparently its bad when its taxation, but when its inheritence there's not problem about it) Its pretty damn clear Dagny Taggart wouldn't have been in the position she was, had the oppornity she had if she had not been in a family.
(althoguh since her brother is shown as being unable to turn the compagny around and that she romance an actual self-made man, I suppose we are ought to see a difference)
Haha, its not a luxury, its a facet of the medium. Movies can be as long as they like, it's just the nature of film for people to get bored after 2-3 hours.Shjade said:The game has the luxury of having longer than two hours to run its story.i7omahawki said:I like how apparently Bioshock, a videogame, captured Rand's philosophy better than a movie dedicated to her work.
Go games I guess.
Well, what do you think about the news that the film is rather badly done and just boring?Dormin111 said:Snip
Yeah, that\s pretty much it. Dagny is rather explicitly compared to those around her who are given their wealth and power by birth and don't make proper use of it. It's a bit of an odd choice on some levels, but it does make for easier storytelling. It sets Dagny up as both a character able to perform the role she does and a convenient point of comparison to others not pulling their own weight in a single stroke. Rand never was much for quality deep character creation.Redem said:Anyone find kinda strange Ayn Rand would pick a heiress as main protagonist?
I mean the very mechanic of inheritance kinda throw a big wrench in her obsession with self-made man?
Power, wealth, influence and title can all be given to someone through the wealth of someone else solely because that person died (apparently its bad when its taxation, but whits inheritence there's not problem about it) Its pretty damn clear Dagny Taggart wouldn't have been in the position she was, had the oppornity she had if she had not been in a family.
(althoguh since her brother is shown as being unable to turn the compagny around and that she romance an actual self-made man, I suppose we are ought to see a difference)
HankMan said:So I guess you could say the message of the film got...
*puts on sunglasses*
De-Railed
YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH